Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,632 results
2.04s
St. Augustine School v. Jill Underly
78 F.4th 349 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 14, 2023
The Superintendent attempts to in- voke sovereign immunity, but her sovereign immunity de- fense was waived when she voluntarily joined in the removal to federal court. See Lapides v. … Augustine IV when we did not clearly and unambiguously rule on the constitutionality of the defendants’ actions.
Cited 32 timesPublished518 F.2d 116 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 2, 1975
Smith [ 392 U.S. 309 , 88 S.Ct. 2128 , 20 L,Ed.2d 1118] establishes that, at least in the absence of congressional authorization for the exclusion clearly evidenced from the Social Security Act or its legislative history, … But the burden of proof clearly rests upon the AFDC recipient to establish need. The State of Illinois would not object to giving such an individual the additional aid to eliminate the deficit under the circumstances.
Cited 24 timesPublished621 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 3, 2010
The Court’s comment was made in a footnote during its discussion of whether the New York pricing scheme qualified for state actor immunity. … Because we conclude that the Act is not preempted, we need not consider whether the provision would qualify for state action immunity under Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943).
Cited 9 timesPublished748 F.2d 1186 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 30, 1984
Courts, however, have found it proper to review executive actions taken pursuant to treaties, statutory authority or established administrative procedures. 5 See Hopson, 622 F.2d at 1380-1382 (appropriate to re *1192 view … Plaintiffs ultimately seem to argue that the consular immunity right itself is unconstitutional.
Cited 33 timesPublishedKenneth R. Shockley v. Mary Spinner Jones and Terry McLain
823 F.2d 1068 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 26, 1987
The defendants also alleged immunity from suit based on the good faith performance of their official duties. … the plaintiff with the opportunity to discover the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction.
Cited 212 timesPublished472 F.2d 985 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 18, 1973
As this Court recently made clear: “Restitution is clearly an equitable remedy. … impression whose resolution was not clearly foreshadowed * * 404 U.S. at 106 , 92 S.Ct. at 355 (emphasis supplied).
Reversed on other grounds by Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974)Cited 63 timesPublished694 F. App'x 422 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 16, 2017
immunity from suit under § 1983. … All of this serves to highlight the magnitude of the burden that Geasland must carry in establishing that his conviction clearly is not one that relates to abusive sexual contact with a minor.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. Plank
776 F.2d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 29, 1985
Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous. … First is the bizarre contention that because the government immunized Kennedy from prosecution in order to obtain his testimony before the grand jury, he was effectively unavailable to defendants.
Cited 167 timesPublishedErnest Werner Loos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
407 F.2d 651 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 24, 1969
The record clearly shows his application for IV-C classification was not ignored. Actually there is substantial evidence supporting the Board’s finding *653 that Loos’ application for that classification was granted. … In that case, the INS conceded that petitioner Yuen Lan Horn was qualified in every respect, except for her misrepresentation, to acquire United States citizenship.
Cited 4 timesPublished926 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 29, 1991
If a [prosecutor's] function was quasi-judicial, the [prosecutor] enjoys absolute immunity. If the function was administrative or investigatory, the [prosecutor] enjoys only qualified immunity." 15 Henderson v. … Under Illinois law, "it is a familiar and firmly established principle that the State's Attorney, as a member of the executive branch of government, is vested with exclusive discretion in the initiation and management of
Cited 4 timesPublishedHenry Ruppel v. CBS Corporation
701 F.3d 1176 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 30, 2012
Among the requirements for removal is a colorable federal defense, and CBS asserted it was entitled to government contractor immunity. … Requiring the defense only be colorable, instead of “clearly sustainable,” advances this goal. Id. at 407.
Cited 85 timesPublishedRachel Ybarra v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 3, 2020
I would affirm summary judgment on the narrower ground of qualified immunity on plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim. In briefing in this court, plaintiff effectively conceded that qualified immunity is appropriate. … immunity.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Cristofer Tichenor
683 F.3d 358 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 13, 2012
For several reasons, Tichenor has failed to establish that this clause was vague as applied to him. … Regardless of any uncertainty as to the scope of the residual clause in other contexts and which methodology to apply, Tichenor’s prior offense had been clearly identified as qualifying as a crime of violence in this circuit
Overruled by United States v. Tony Hurlburt, 835 F.3d 715 (2016)Cited 54 timesPublishedBrian Davis v. City of Milwaukee
642 F. App'x 627 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 17, 2016
Chalstrom responded that a reasonable building-code inspector would not know that a warrantless inspection of the exterior of an unoccupied rental building from publicly accessible areas violates clearly established federal … At our suggestion, the district court ordered the parties to submit additional briefing regarding qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJuan Mendez v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 3, 2025
The district court found no Fourth Amendment violation under the totality of the circum- stances and relied on qualified immunity in the alternative. We affirm. … It acknowledged that the footage was too unclear to establish that Mendez had pointed a gun at the officers.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEqual Employment Opportunity Commission v. O & G Spring and Wire Forms Specialty Company
38 F.3d 872 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 11, 1994
Three people testified that they were over 45 and qualified to work at O & G, but had been rejected. The EEOC also introduced two letters written to the EEOC. … Statistics may prove such a pattern, id., and here they clearly did.
Cited 66 timesPublishedBissessur v. Indiana University Board of Trustees
581 F.3d 599 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 11, 2009
It found that the defendants had qualified immunity with respect to Bissessur’s claims for monetary damages. … contract establishes an entitlement to a tangible continuing benefit, see Bd. of Regents of State Colleges v.
Cited 435 timesPublishedUnited States v. Burnell G. Watson
623 F.2d 1198 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 11, 1980
restatement of instruction No. 6 on the same subject which was given by the court. 15 The trial court *1205 was under no obligation to adopt the language requested in the proposed instruction since the charge given to the jury clearly … The trial judge agreed with the government that the requested instruction on immunity was argumentative.
Cited 47 timesPublished576 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 7, 2009
The surrender also did not establish that Johnson was unarmed. … Ill In addition to arguing that he should be granted summary judgment because his conduct was reasonable, Scott also asserts that he is entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 96 timesPublishedState of Illinois v. Chiplease, Incorporated
721 F.3d 796 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 28, 2013
The amendment establishes a morato- rium on new Qualified Facilities, provides additional grounds for disqualifying facilities from the subsidy, and expands the conditions under subsection (d) that trigger a facility’s liability … Mark’s Const., Inc., 923 N.E.2d 735, 743 (Ill. 2010) (“[T]he legislature clearly ex- pressed its intent that the statute be given retroactive effect.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna