Case law

United States v. H. Bradford Aarons

718 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 5, 1983

Aarons was the chairman of the board of directors of PFI, and Neagley was its president. … Although Aarons was a member of the board of directors of the Bank which elected Busard as its officer, and was chairman of the board of PFI, of which Neagley and Fosth were officers, the record does not suggest that these

United States v. Richards

56 F. App'x 667 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 17, 2003

See, e.g., United States v. Harvey, 16 F.3d 109, 112 (6th Cir.1994); United States v. Thomas, 11 F.3d 620, 628 (6th Cir.1993). … See United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221, 235 , 105 S.Ct. 675 , 83 L.Ed.2d 604 (1985); Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 738 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). Had Mrs.

United States v. Thomas James Sinito

723 F.2d 1250 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1984

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. at 166 , 97 S.Ct. at 2226 . … In Brown v.

Magnolia Screw Products, Inc. v. N. L. R. B.

548 F.2d 130 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 15, 1976

The decision and order of the Board is reported at 220 N.L.R.B. 316 . … B. v.

Ford v. Martin

49 F. App'x 584 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 28, 2002

Under § 1997e(a), a prisoner must exhaust all of his available administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action in federal court, Brown v. … See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483 , 115 S.Ct. 2293 , 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 245 , 103 S.Ct. 1741 , 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983); Montanye v.

United States v. School District

577 F.2d 1339 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 17, 1978

In McDaniel v. Mallary Bros. … Bailey v. Martin, 101 Ga.App. 63, 68-69 , 112 S.E.2d 807, 810-11 (1960). See also State Highway Dep’t v.

Summitt v. Bordenkircher

608 F.2d 247 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 19, 1979

BAILEY BROWN, Chief District Judge. … See Brown v. Kentucky, 564 S.W.2d 24 (Ct.App.1978).

National Labor Relations Board v. F.O. Jr., Inc. D/B/A Hayden Bi-Rite

904 F.2d 707 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1990

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. F.O. JR., INC. d/b/a Hayden Bi-Rite, Respondent. No. 90-5478. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 11, 1990. 1 Before KEITH and ALAN E. … POTTER, District Judge * . 2 JUDGMENT ENFORCING AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 3 This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for summary entry of a judgment against

Communications Workers of America v. United Telephone Company of Ohio

478 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 1973

v. … The superior authority of the Board may be invoked at any time. Meanwhile the therapy of arbitration is brought to bear in a complicated and troubled area. Carey v.

James D. Gibson v. Samuel McMurray Latrice Sain

159 F.3d 230 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 20, 1998

See Behrens v. … Tony “L” and Joey “L” v. Childers, 71 F.3d 1182, 1185 (6th Cir.1995); Pusey v. City of Youngstown, 11 F.3d 652, 656 (6th Cir.1993).

City of East Detroit, a Municipal Corporation v. Detroit Edison Company, a New York Corporation

272 F.2d 410 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 1959

On May 12, 1958, the Board undertook to rehear the matter and passed a resolution rejecting the plans. An election had intervened resulting in some change in the composition of the Board. … Having granted permission to construct the control shelter on March 3, 1958, the Board could not rehear the matter under Michigan law, after the expiration of five days. McVeigh v.

B & G Mining v. OWCP

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 16, 2008

It also subtracted six hours from the claimed 14.25 hours for duplicative work and work unrelated to the appeal before the board. … Gonter v. Hunt Valve Co., Inc., 510 F.3d 610, 616 (6th Cir. 2007) (citing Geier v. Sundquist, 372 F.3d 784, 789 (6th Cir. 2004)); Zeigler Coal Co. v.

Commissioner v. Carey-Reed Co.

101 F.2d 602 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1939

Typical of these cases are: City of Catlettsburg v. … See Shaver v. Rice, Mayor, 209 Ky. 467, 474 , 273 S.W. 48 . But we are not required to determine the effect of these local decisions upon the administration of a national taxing act (Brush v.

McCARTHNEY v. BUSEY

954 F.2d 1147 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 1992

BOARD'S ACTION NOT UNTIMELY 35 Respondents cite Administrator v. … Board of Governors v. First Lincolnwood Corp., 439 U.S. 234, 253 , 99 S.Ct. 505, 515 (1978); Consol. Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 -217 (1938); Hatfield v.

Noor Sakhawati v. Loretta Lynch

839 F.3d 476 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 7, 2016

No. 15-3575 Sakhawati v. … Bryant v. Comm’n of Soc. Sec., 578 F.3d 443, 450 (6th Cir. 2009).

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 19, United Paperworkers International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc

893 F.2d 1335 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 1990

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LOCAL 19, UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, Respondent. No. 89-6558. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Jan. 23, 1990. Before BOYCE F. … , its officers, agents, and representatives, on November 9, 1989, in a proceeding before the said Board numbered 9-CB-6517; upon the transcript of the record in said proceeding, certified and filed in this Court enforcing

Hicks v. Frey

992 F.2d 1450 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1993

In Estelle v. … Judge Bailey Brown stated them succinctly for the court in Ratliff v.

Fox v. Parker Hannifin Corp.

914 F.2d 795 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 20, 1990

Dzierwa v. … Although state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress strictly based upon a defendant’s exercise of CBA rights do not escape the preemptive force of section 301, see, e.g., Brown v.

Jane Doe v. Michael DeWine

910 F.3d 842 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 11, 2018

State v. Bodyke, 933 N.E.2d 753 (Ohio 2010). … Russell held that these actions sufficiently affected the plaintiff so as to subject both the Secretary and the Board members to suit under Ex parte Young. See id. at 1049.

Eddie Williams, Jr. v. Cherry Lindamood

526 F. App'x 559 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 2013

See Wilkinson v. … Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 791 (6th Cir. 1995), we concluded that placement in administrative segregation without a hearing did not amount to a due process violation.