Case law

Steele v. Indust Dev Bd

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 2002

Accord Agostini v. … As the majority opinion notes, the Lemon test, as of the Board of Directors, reformulated by Agostini, continues to have vitality. See Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 122 S.

Hugh B. MULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manuel LUJAN, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Interior, Defendant-Appellee

928 F.2d 207 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 18, 1991

The Board upheld the Interior Department’s action. Plaintiff then appealed to the Merit Systems Protection Appellate Board, which also supported the agency’s position. … Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v.

Jessup v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

96 F. App'x 330 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 23, 2004

The district court affirmed the Public Law Board’s decision. This appeal followed. … Essentially, Jessup established nothing within the limited judicial review of the Public Law Board’s determination. See Union Pac. R. R. Co. v. Sheehan, 439 U.S. 89, 93 , 99 S. Ct. 399 , 58 L.Ed.2d 354 (1978); Jones v.

Marvin Lovejoy v. United States

14 F.3d 601 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 1993

Defendant relies on United States v. … Marshall v. Lonberger, 459 U.S. 422, 436 (1983). In United States v.

Joel Goldberg v. Charter Township of West, Bloomfield, Sandra Draur, R.G. Crites, and Estate of John N. Doherty

922 F.2d 841 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 1990

Before KENNEDY and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and Bailey BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. … zoning board denied plaintiff's request for a variance); Bulchis v.

Day & Night Nat. Bank of Pikeville v. Coffey

25 F.2d 403 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 1928

Whether they would alone justify that conclusion (as held in Forrest v. Safety Co. [C. C.] 174 F. 345 ) we need not consider. … The case of First National Bank v. Golden, 19 Cal. App. 501 , 126 P. 498 , is cited as authority for this position.

Mary Doe John Doe, by and Through His Next Friend, Mary Doe v. Woodford County Board of Education William S. Foley, Dr., Chairperson and His Successor, in His Official Capacity as Member of the Woodford County Board of Education Ambrose Wilson, Iv, and His Successor, in His Official Capacity as Member of the Woodford County Board of Education Margie Cleveland, and Her Successor, in Her Official Capacity as Member of the Woodford County Board of Education David Moore, and His Successor, in His Official Capacity as Member of the Woodford County Board of Education P. T. Vance, and His Successor, in His Official Capacity as Member of the Woodford County Board of Education Charles L. Dowler, Dr., in His Individual Capacity, and His Successor, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Woodford County Public Schools Corlia Logsdon, and Her Successor, in Her Official Capacity as Section 504 and Ada Coordinator for the Woodford County Public Schools Roy Chapman, in His Individual Capacity, as Principal, Woodford County Middle School Mike Burkich, in His Individual Capacity, as Principal, Woodford County Middle School Gene Kirk, in His Individual Capacity, and His Successor, in His Official Capacity as Head Basketball Coach, Woodford County High School Bobby Gibson, in His Individual Capacity, and His Successor, in His Official Capacity as Assistant Basketball Coach, Woodford County High School

213 F.3d 921 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 26, 2000

213 F.3d 921 (6th Cir. 2000) Mary Doe; John Doe, by and through his next friend, Mary Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Woodford County Board of Education; William S. … See Burns v. City of Columbus, 91 F.3d 836, 841 (6th Cir. 1996); Monette v. Electronic Data Systems Corp., 90 F.3d.1173, 1178 (6th Cir. 1996).

Armour v. E. Bement's Sons

123 F. 56 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 1903

Trust Co. v. Bridges, 57 Fed. 753 , 6 C. C. A. 539 . The case as stated in the declaration and supplemented by certain agreed facts is this: The corporation, “E. … Rogers, Brown & Company did not take out any execution.

Brandywine Inc v. Richmond

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 3, 2004

No. 02-5507 v. City of Richmond v. … v. City of Parma, 263 F.3d 513, 530 (6th Cir. 2001). Claims In FW/PBS, Inc. v.

Brook Heike v. Sue Guevara

519 F. App'x 911 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 18, 2013

She accepted an athletic grant for the 2006–07 academic year, which comprised: “In-State Tuition/Fees, Room and Board, and Book Loan.” … staff refused to give her or Brown as much playing time as the rest of the team because they “were too girly,” and “happened to be white.”

Arnold Southers v. Steve Norris, Pardons and Parole Board, and Ned Ray McWherter Defendants

849 F.2d 610 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 1988

Arnold SOUTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve NORRIS, Pardons and Parole Board, and Ned Ray McWherter, Defendants- Appellees. No. 87-6240. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 16, 1988. Before BOYCE F. … 34(a). 2 Seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, the plaintiff sued the Governor of Tennessee, the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Corrections and the members of the Board

Horton v. Ford Motor Co

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 27, 2005

Ford denied her request and she sought review from the Ford Motor Company-UAW Retirement Board of Administration (“Board”), which also denied her request on the ground that Mr. … Tire and Rubber Co. v.

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Courtney

103 F. 599 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 1900

In Association v. Smith, 126 Pa. … In Bennett v. Insurance Co., 67 N.

National Labor Relations Board v. District 30, United Mine Workers of America, Respondent(s)

959 F.2d 235 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 31, 1992

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT 30, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Respondent(s). No. 92-5235. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 31, 1992. Before DAVID A. … , representatives, employees and agents, on May 14, 1991, in a proceeding before the said Board numbered 9-CC-1400-2, 9-CC-1418-2, 9-CC-1420-3, 9-CC-1421, and 9-CC-1450-2; upon the transcript of the record in said proceeding

Kurinsky v. United States

33 F.3d 594 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 26, 1994

In McSurely v. … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 990 (6th Cir.1989). Thus it follows, as this court recently observed in Friedman v.

Seale v. Citizens Savings & Loan Association

806 F.2d 99 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 15, 1987

See, e.g., Newman v. … Campbell v. Board of Trustees, 705 F.2d 451 (6th Cir.1982) and cases cited therein.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. General MacHinery Corp.

95 F.2d 759 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 1938

The Supreme Court in Helvering v. … Commissioner, 91 F.2d 100 , and supported by the reasoning of the court in the Second Circuit in Corner Broadway-Maiden Lane, Inc. v. Commissioner, 76 F.2d 106 . The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Commissioner v. Consolidated Premium Iron Ores, Ltd.

265 F.2d 320 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 10, 1959

Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111 , 50 S.Ct. 241 , 74 L.Ed. 731 ; Helvering v. Horst, 311 U.S. 112 , 61 S.Ct. 144 , 85 L.Ed. 75 ; Helvering v. … Sheldon & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 214 F.2d 655 ; Letcher County v. DeFoe, 6 Cir., 151 F.2d 987 ; Seagrave Corp. v. Mount, 6 Cir., 212 F.2d 389 ; Yunker v.

Fadee Mulazim v. Silva Goncalves, Sushil Lahir, Robert Redman, Michael Meador, Tom Gerotzka, Robert Brown, Ann Baerwalde

826 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 1987

Fadee MULAZIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Silva GONCALVES, Sushil Lahir, Robert Redman, Michael Meador, Tom Gerotzka, Robert Brown, Ann Baerwalde, Defendants-Appellees. … Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Wright v. Holbrook, 794 F.2d 1152 (6th Cir. 1986); see also Steinhoff v. Harris, 698 F.2d 270, 272 (6th Cir. 1983).

Hitachi Zosen Clearing, Inc. v. Tek-Matik, Inc.

846 F.2d 27 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 4, 1988

BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. This is an action for breach of contract wherein plaintiff Hitachi Zosen Clearing, Inc. (“Clearing”) alleges, inter alia, that defendant Tek-Matik, Inc. … Packers v.