Case law

Goss v. Board of Education

319 F.2d 857 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 8, 1963

Fotomat Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

573 F.2d 959 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 12, 1978

ORDER Plaintiff-appellant instituted this action in the district court to require disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act by the National Labor Relations Board. … See also, Baptist Memorial Hospital v. NLRB, 568 F.2d 1 (6th Cir. 1977); New England Medical Center Hospital v. NLRB, 548 F.2d 377 (1st Cir. 1976).

Democratic Executive Committee of Columbiana County, Ohio v. Brown

530 F.2d 977 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 20, 1976

530 F.2d 977 Democratic Executive Committee of Columbiana County, Ohio v. Brown 75-2156 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 1/20/76 N.D.Ohio AFFIRMED

National Labor Relations Board v. Lauren Manufacturing Company

712 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 22, 1983

As such, the Board’s determination regarding the supervisory status of the line operators is not to be overturned as long as there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support its finding. NLRB v. … Beverly Enterprises v. NLRB, 661 F.2d at 1098 . Ac *248 cord, NLRB v. City Yellow Cab Co., 344 F.2d 575, 580-82 (6th Cir.1965).

Betty Bragg v. Flint Board of Education

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 2009

Flint Board of Education, et al. … No. 08-1632 Bragg v. Flint Board of Education, et al.

National Labor Relations Board v. Welsh Industries, Inc.

385 F.2d 538 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 29, 1967

We deny enforcement to this part of the Board’s order. To offend the Act, interrogation must rise to the level of coercion or restraint. Burke Golf Equipment Corp. v. … And we may not substitute our own views and inferences, thus trespassing on the Board’s prerogatives. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e). NLRB v. Walton Mfg.

James Jonathan Mapp v. Board of Education of the City of Chattanooga, Hamilton County, Tennessee

295 F.2d 617 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 1961

The Court held that the activities of the Board were not a sufficient start toward compliance with the decisions of the Supreme Court in the two Brown cases and in Cooper v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955).

Roberts v. Benefits Review Board

822 F.2d 636 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 1987

In Ramey v. … See also Moseley v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Robert Haws Company

403 F.2d 979 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 22, 1968

Since there were no exceptions presented to the Board, there are no contestable issues before this Court and the July 6, 1965 remedial order of the Board is enforced. N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir.1963). The cases where the employees are available but fail to testify at the backpay hearing are inapposite here (see, e.g., N. L. R. B. v.

Kamtech, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

314 F.3d 800 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 4, 2002

See NLRB v. … NLRB v. Gen. Servs. Corp., 162 F.3d 437, 442 (6th Cir.1998). FiveCAP, Inc. v. NLRB, 294 F.3d 768, 777-78 (6th Cir.2002).

Maurice S. Wilson v. National Labor Relations Board

920 F.2d 1282 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1990

Cummins v. … The Board’s analogy to tax cases is unpersuasive. In Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v.

Triplex Screw Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

117 F.2d 858 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 14, 1941

Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 6 Cir., 110 F.2d 843, 847 , affirmed 61 S.Ct. 320, 322 , 85 L.Ed. -; National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333, 346, 347 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Thermofil Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

650 F.2d 858 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1981

ORDER Upon consideration of the briefs, record and arguments of counsel, we are of the opinion that substantial evidence supports the order of the Board entered on September 14,1979, reported at 244 NLRB No. 171 , finding … Enforcement of the Board’s order is therefore granted. ENGEL, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Williamson Piggly Wiggly v. National Labor Relations Board

827 F.2d 1098 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 16, 1987

E.g., Medical Center at Bowling Green v. NLRB, 712 F.2d 1091 (6th Cir.1983); Iowa Elec. Light and Power Co. v. NLRB, 717 F.2d 433 (8th Cir.1983); Methodist Home v. NLRB, 596 F,2d 1173 (4th Cir.1979); NLRB v. … Moreover, we agree that “[i]t is important for the Board not to construe supervisory status too broadly, for a worker who is deemed to be a supervisor loses his organizational rights.” McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ohio Masonic Home

892 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 18, 1989

We must uphold the conclusions of the Board where the record contains substantial evidence to support them. Emery Realty, Inc. v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 1259, 1262 (6th Cir.1988); 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v. … We also apply the substantial evidence test to the Board’s application of the law to the facts and may not displace any of the Board’s reasonable inferences. Emery Realty, 863 F.2d at 1262 ; NLRB v.

Seegull Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

741 F.2d 882 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 28, 1984

Falcone v. IRS, 714 F.2d 646, 647 (6th Cir.1983) (citing Wolfel v. United States, supra). … See, e.g., Murty v. O.P.M., 707 F,2d 815 (4th Cir.1983); Education/Instruccion, Inc. v. H. U.D., 649 F.2d 4 (1st Cir.1981); Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740 (D.C.Cir.1979).

National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Egg Company

201 F.2d 370 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 1953

In view of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in National Labor Relations Board v. … Dant, 73 S.Ct 375 , the petition for rehearing in this cause is granted, the judgment heretofore entered by this court is reversed and vacated, 6 Cir., 199 F.2d 95 , and the petition of the National Labor Relations Board

National Labor Relations Board v. Pactiv Corp.

23 F. App'x 439 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 2001

CONSENT JUDGMENT This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) for the enforcement of a certain order on consent issued by it against the respondent, Pactiv Corporation, … Upon consideration whereof, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this court that the Board’s order be, and the same is hereby enforced.

Burger King Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

725 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 13, 1984

The test is set forth in N.L.R.B. v. Elias Bros. Big Boy, Inc., 325 F.2d 360 (6th Cir.1963) and reaffirmed in National Labor Relations Board v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Harrah’s Club, 337 F.2d 177 (9th Cir.1964); see also, Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Armstrong Circuit, Inc.

462 F.2d 355 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 23, 1972

In N.L.R.B. v. … We have carefully considered these reasons as a part of the record which may tend to detract from the evidence relied upon by the Board. Appropriate here is our statement in N. L.R.B. v. Boot-Ster Mfg.