Case law

The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. James K. Lykins

216 F.2d 129 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 27, 1954

Board.” … Instead, the disclosure was made by the person who had furnished the information to the Board, and this the statute does not prohibit. Cf. Hines v. Kelley, Tex.Com.App., 252 S.W. 1033, 1037 ; Gerow v.

Roth Steel Tube Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

800 F.2d 625 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 10, 1986

One resolution of taxpayer’s board of directors authorized loans to Remco, and resolutions of Remco’s board of directors approved receipt of advances from taxpayer in the aggregate amount of $2,997,150. … Cooper v. Commissioner, 542 F.2d 599, 601 (2d Cir.1976) (per curiam); Adolph Coors Co. v. Commissioner, 519 F.2d 1280, 1284 (10th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 878 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); Hayutin v.

Dennis M. Wolfel, Cross-Appellant v. Nick Sanborn, Cross-Appellees

555 F.2d 583 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 2, 1977

That is not to say that school board members are “charged with predicting the future course of constitutional law.” Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S., at 577 [ 87 S.Ct. 1213 ]. … Shirley v. Burns, 424 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 1111 , 47 L.Ed.2d 317 (1976), and also to evaluate the qualified immunity from personal liability for damages available to members of a university Board of Trustees, Martin v.

Prater v. Hite Preparation Company

829 F.2d 1363 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 22, 1987

He cites Couch v. … See Ratliff v. Benefits Review Board, 816 F.2d 1121, 1122 (6th Cir.1987); Engle v. Director, OWCP, 792 F.2d 63 , 64 n. 1 (6th Cir.1986); Moseley v. Peabody Coal Co., 769 F.2d 357, 361 (6th Cir.1985); Ramey v.

United States v. Yono

605 F.3d 425 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 2010

See Brown v. Artuz, 124 F.3d 73, 79 (2d Cir. 1997) (“[T]he trial judge need not stop a defendant called by defense counsel to the stand and explain the right not to testify. . . .”). … United States v.

Anthony Liberatore v. Bill R. Story, Warden

854 F.2d 830 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 5, 1988

Petitioner appealed the decision to the National Appeals Board of the U.S. Parole Commission, but the Appeals Board affirmed the ruling of the Regional Commissioner. … The National Appeals Board agreed with the Regional Commissioner’s assessment and upheld her decision. Thus, the final result would have been the same regardless of which appeal procedure was utilized. See Scott v.

Rubber Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

335 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 20, 1964

In Interstate Drop Forge Co. v. … In Schner-Bloek Company v.

Jacob Bradley v. Jefferson Cnty. Public Schs.

88 F.4th 1190 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 21, 2023

And Morehead State’s board of regents, not Jefferson County’s board of education, bears responsibility for reporting about Craft to the State. Ky. Rev. … See Jones v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Union Underwear Company, Inc.

902 F.2d 34 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1990

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNION UNDERWEAR COMPANY, INC., Respondent. No. 89-5743. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. May 1, 1990. … Union Carbide Corp. v.

Barr v. Lafon

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 20, 2008

Defendants-Appellees are collectively referred to as “the Board” throughout the opinion. No. 07-5743 Barr et al. v. Lafon, et al. … The Third Circuit’s decision in Sypniewski v. Warren Hills Regional Board of Education, 307 F.3d 243 (3d Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1033 (2003), is readily distinguishable.

Life Time Doors, Incorporated v. Walled Lake Door Company

505 F.2d 1165 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 15, 1974

Waterman v. Mackenzie, 138 U.S. 252 , 11 S.Ct. 334 , 34 L.Ed. 923 (1891). In Independent Wireless Tel. Co. v. … Horn Corp. v. New York Life Ins. Co., 113 F.2d 864, 865 (2d Cir. 1940). A mere licensee has no right even to be joined in a suit for infringement. Overman Cushion Tire Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ratliff Trucking Corporation, Inc.

918 F.2d 958 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 19, 1990

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. RATLIFF TRUCKING CORPORATION, INC., Respondent. No. 90-6186. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 19, 1990. No. 7-CA-30119; NLRB. NLRB ORDER ENFORCED. … that Respondent, Ratliff Trucking Corporation, Inc., its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, abide by and perform the directions of the Board in said order contained. 3 Mandate shall issue forthwith.

National Labor Relations Board v. Clark Distributing Company, Inc.

917 F.2d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 24, 1990

The balancing of these competing considerations is for the Board, not the court, See NLRB v. … See Medical Center at Bowling Green v.

Noble Graham Transport, Inc. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America

766 F.2d 222 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 25, 1985

See Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. … E.g., North Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 , 92 S.Ct. 402, 404 , 30 L.Ed.2d 413 (1971) (per curiam); Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 241 , 57 S.Ct. 461, 464 , 81 L.Ed. 617 (1937).

National Labor Relations Board v. New Medico Health Care Center of Michigan, Inc.

951 F.2d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 20, 1991

Where a Board's order has "no reasonable basis in law," such an order will not be enforced. Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB, 441 U.S. 488, 497 (1979). … In Briggs Plumbingware, Inc., v.

American Seating Co. v. Bullard

290 F. 896 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1923

A. 247 ; Smith v. Smith, Sturgeon & Co., 125 Mich. 234 , 84 N. W. 144 ; Beling v. Amer. Tobacco Co., 72 N. J. Eq. 3249, 65 Atl. 725 ; Lauman v. Lebanon Valley R. R. Co., 30 Pa. 42 , 72 Am. Dec. 685 ; Barnett v. Phila. … United Box Board & Paper Co., 72 N. J. Eq. 580, 66 Atl. 938 ; Beling v. Amer. Tobacco Co., 72 N. J. Eq. 32, 42, 49, 65 Atl. 725 .

Doe v. Bredesen

507 F.3d 998 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 16, 2007

. § 40-39-301 et seq., which became effective July 1, 2004. 1 The Monitoring Act authorized the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole (“the board”) to subject a convicted sexual offender to a satellite-based monitoring … Hobbs v.

Michael Victor v. Kimberly Reynolds

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 2026

Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 (1997)). … Pineda v. Hamilton County, 977 F.3d 483, 491 (6th Cir. 2020). And a witness cannot “create a dispute of fact” about whether an event occurred if the witness “has no recollection” of the event. Pratt v. Brown Mach.

Howard v. J. N. Zellner & Sons Transfer Co.

529 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 27, 1976

Grigsby v. Bratton, 128 Tenn. 597 , 163 S.W. 804 (1912). … Frady v. Smith, 519 S.W.2d 584 (Tenn.1974); Holt v. Walsh, 180 Tenn. 307 , 174 S.W.2d 657 (1943); Adams v. Brown, 37 Tenn.App. 258 , 262 S.W.2d 79 (1953).

Meyer Goldberg, Inc. v. Fisher Foods, Inc.

823 F.2d 159 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 2, 1987

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1177-79 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984). … In re Knoxville News Sentinel Co., 723 F.2d 470, 473-74 (6th Cir.1983) (citing Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1177 ).