Case law

Bomer v. Ribicoff

304 F.2d 427 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 25, 1962

Zeller v. Folsom, 150 F.Supp. 615, 617 , N.D.N.Y.; Coy v. Folsom, 228 F.2d 276, 279-280 , C.A.3rd; Ewing v. Risher, 176 F.2d 641 , C.A.10th; Scott v. Railroad Retirement Board, 227 F.2d 684, 686 , C.A.7th. … Thompson v. Social Security Board, 81 U.S.App.D.C.27, 154 F.2d 204 ; Randall v. Flemming, 192 F.Supp. 111, 115 , D.C.Mich.

Thompson v. United States, Small Business Administration

8 F. App'x 547 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 4, 2001

Res., Inc. v. Shelby Ins. Co., 84 F.3d 211, 214 (6th Cir.1996). … Fishburn v. Brown, 125 F.3d 979, 982 (6th Cir.1997). Therefore, the district court did not have jurisdiction to review this claim. *549 Accordingly, this court affirms the district court’s judgment.

National Labor Relations Board v. Art Berger, a Sole Proprietor Doing Business as Art Berger

39 F.3d 1182 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 19, 1994

Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought. See NLRB v. … with Board); NLRB v.

Avery v. United States

104 F. 711 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 7, 1900

Board v. Edson, 18 Ohio St. 226 ; Commissioners v. Young, 8 C. C. A. 27 , 59 Fed. 96, 99 . … To the same purport are *717 the cases of Curtis v. Board, 43 Kan. 138 , 23 Pac. 98 ; Packard v. Ames, 16 Gray, 327 ; Stanley v. Colt, 5 Wall. 119 , 18 L. Ed. 502 .

Michael Adams v. Constance M. Upper, Hearing Officer Reginald A. Wilkinson, Director Margarette T. Ghee, Parole Board Chairperson

67 F.3d 299 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 27, 1995

See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 593 (6th Cir.1989). Therefore, the defendants are not subject to suit for monetary damages under Sec. 1983. Will v. … However, parole guidelines that do not divest a parole board's discretion in granting parole do not qualify as ex post facto laws. See United States v.

Glasgow v. Commissioner of Social Security

690 F. App'x 385 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 19, 2017

See McGrew v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 343 F. … Brown’s opinion -3- No. 16-4213, Glasgow v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. and erred by failing to take into account Dr.

United States v. James A. Russo Vincent Meli Roby G. Smith

708 F.2d 209 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 20, 1983

Given both the obvious interdependence between Judge Brown’s opinion in this case and United States v. … I should add that I agree with Judge Holschuh’s analysis of United States v. En-mons, 410 U.S. 396 , 93 S.Ct. 1007 , 35 L.Ed.2d 379 (1973). We part company, however, over its application to the facts of this case.

Howard Lee White v. State of Tennessee

447 F.2d 1354 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 7, 1971

Meadows v. N. Y., 426 F.2d 1176, 1179-1183 (2d Cir.); Word v. North Carolina, 406 F.2d 352, 360-361 (4th Cir.); May v. Georgia, 409 F.2d 203 (5th Cir.). See generally Lewis v. New Mexico, 423 F.2d 1048 (10th Cir.). … Compare Booker v. Arkansas, 380 F.2d 240, 243 (8th Cir.), with Brown v. Arkansas, 426 F.2d 677, 678 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 966 , 91 S.Ct. 377 , 27 L.Ed.2d 386 . In Ahrens v.

Jesse H. Barrett v. Franklin County, Ohio, Michael Helds James Brown

811 F.2d 603 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 23, 1986

BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO, et al., Defendants, Michael Helds; James Brown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-3977. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 23, 1986. … Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56 (1982).

Giuseppe Peter Pulice v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

218 F.3d 505 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 13, 2000

See Mansour v. … Petitioner’s arguments, however, are moot in light of this Court’s recent decision in Pak v.

In Re Detroit Auto Dealers Association, Inc., Barnett Pontiac-Datsun, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

955 F.2d 457 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 22, 1992

Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242, 243 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918) (quoted in White Motor Co. v. United States, 372 U.S. 253, 261 , 83 S.Ct. 696, 700 , 9 L.Ed.2d 738 (1963)). … Brown v. Cincinnati Automobile Dealers Ass’n, 71 Ohio Op.2d 467 (1974). We first examine the Commission’s equation of reduction in hours of operation to reduction in “output.”

National Labor Relations Board v. Clark Distributing Company, Inc.

917 F.2d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 24, 1990

The balancing of these competing considerations is for the Board, not the court, See NLRB v. … See Medical Center at Bowling Green v.

National Labor Relations Board v. New Medico Health Care Center of Michigan, Inc.

951 F.2d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 20, 1991

Where a Board's order has "no reasonable basis in law," such an order will not be enforced. Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB, 441 U.S. 488, 497 (1979). … In Briggs Plumbingware, Inc., v.

Martin v. Johnson

72 F. App'x 256 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 7, 2003

Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). … Jones v. Smith, 266 F.3d 399, 400 (6th Cir.2001).

Horn v. Eltra Corp.

686 F.2d 439 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 26, 1982

State Board of Education of North Carolina, 418 F.2d 874 (4th Cir. 1969); Fuller v. … Principally, the EEOC relies upon Pasedena City Board of Education v.

Ruby H. Harris v. Reginald Callwood & Daisy Callwood

844 F.2d 1254 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 21, 1988

BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring. If we were writing on a clean slate for this circuit, I would be inclined to agree with Judge Ryan’s dissent in its interpretation of Rule 41(b) and Link v. … Bishop v. Cross, 790 F.2d 38 (6th Cir.1986); Patterson v. Township of Grand Blanc, 760 F.2d 686 (6th Cir.1985); Carter v. City of Memphis, Tenn., 636 F.2d 159 (1980); and Holt v. Pitts, 619 F.2d 558 (1980).

City of Corbin v. Joseph Greenspon's Sons Iron & Steel Co.

52 F.2d 939 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 9, 1931

In Bowman v. Foot, 29 Conn. 331, 338 , the court said: . … Southern Development Co. v. Silva, 125 U. S. 247 , 8 S. Ct. 881 , 31 L. Ed. 678 ; Farrar v. Churchill, 135 U. S. 609 , 10 S. Ct. 771 , 34 L. Ed. 246 .

Francisco Ramirez-Rangel v. James W. Butterfield, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, Detroit, Michigan

234 F.2d 828 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 5, 1956

An appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals was dismissed by the Board, which ruled: “Upon full consideration of all factors of the record, it is our conclusion that discretionary relief should be denied.” … Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 158 , 44 S.Ct. 54 , 68 L.Ed. 221 ; United States ex rel. Orlando v. District Director, 2 Cir., 222 F.2d 537 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 862 , 76 S.Ct. 103 ; Couto v.

Fatima Kante v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 4, 2011

No. 08-4043 Kante v. … Finally, the Board found that Kante failed to show eligibility for withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture. This appeal followed. No. 08-4043 Kante v.

32 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 829, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,763 Curtis Foulks, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Adult Parole Authority, and Morris Deforge, and John R. Himmelright, Cross-Appellees

713 F.2d 1229 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 4, 1983

Before KEITH and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. … See Sowers v. OCRC, 20 Ohio Misc. 115 , 252 N.E.2d 463 (1969) (school board member was not an "employer" under the Ohio civil rights statute).