Case law

Lee-Bey v. Gundy

80 F. App'x 435 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 31, 2003

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e), § 1915A, and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c); Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir.2000); Ruiz v. United States, 160 F.3d 273, 275 (5th Cir.1998); Wright v. MetroHealth Med. … In Heck v.

Brock v. Cardinal Industries, Inc.

828 F.2d 373 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 4, 1987

See also Bowman Transp., Inc. v. … In re Atomic Energy Commission, 19 WH Cases 489, 493 (Wage Appeals Board 1967).

Michigan First Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society

641 F.3d 240 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 24, 2011

However, CUMIS put forth no evidence indicating that the MFCU board knew the violations at issue were occurring. … See Johnson v.

Oliver BUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

923 F.2d 1200 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 18, 1991

The Third Circuit in Brown v. … In Brown , the positions of the parties were the reverse of those presented in the instant case.

Canady v. Wilkinson

90 F. App'x 863 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 2, 2004

Gardener; Richard Brown; Janet Marx; Dr. Siehl; Nurse Judith Golinski; and Office Assistant Debbie Harmon. … Holloway v. Brush, 220 F.3d 767, 772 (6th Cir.2000).

Ezenwafor v. Ashcroft

97 F. App'x 29 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 23, 2004

The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed that decision. This petition for review followed. The court previously granted Ezenwafor’s motion for a stay of removal. … Moin v. Ashcroft, 335 F.3d 415, 418 (5th Cir.2003).

Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

147 F.2d 189 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 13, 1945

In George v. … In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Katz, 7 Cir., 139 F. 2d 107 , the Board, and the court affirming, held the income of the trusts not taxable to the settlor.

Johnston v. Sanders

86 F. App'x 909 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 30, 2004

United Parcel Serv., 342 F.3d 509, 514 (6th Cir.2003); Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir.2000). Johnston’s claims are not cognizable because he challenges the procedure used to deny him good-time credits. … In Heck v.

Rehby Youssif Abdel Malak v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General

419 F.3d 533 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 19, 2005

Rehby Youssif Abdel Malak, an Egyptian citizen and native, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing as untimely his BIA appeal. … In Anssari-Gharachedaghy v.

Himelhoch Bros. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

83 F.2d 485 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 1936

Finley Shoe & Leather Co. v. Kurtz, 34 Mich. 89 . … Labrot v. Burnet, Commissioner, 61 App.D.C. 47 , 57 F.(2d) 413 ; Mount v. Commissioner, 48 F.(2d) 550 (C.C.A.2); Pugh Co., Inc., v. Helvering, Commissioner, 63 App.D.C. 172 , 70 F.(2d) 776 ; King v.

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. U.S. Department of Labor

567 F. App'x 334 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 2014

Both parties petitioned the Administrative Review Board (“ARB”) for review of the ALJ’s findings. … Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 F. App’x 368, 374 (6th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Ricky Peete

919 F.2d 1168 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 28, 1990

On January 5, 1989, a Colonial Partners representative presented the project before the Land Use Control Board. The Board approved the project and the matter was set for a vote before the Memphis City Council. … Ferby: lived in Peete’s district, attended high school in Peete’s district, and worked for Board of Education. Mrs. Wallace: is employed by the City of Memphis Board of Education. Ms.

Kelley v. De Nemours and Company

17 F.3d 836 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 11, 1994

Johnson City Medical Ctr. v. … Skidmore v.

Sigler v. Woanski

93 F. App'x 32 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 8, 2004

Robinson v. Jones, 142 F.3d 905, 906 (6th Cir.1998). … See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989).

Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R. v. King

120 F. 614 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 19, 1902

In Franklin Co. v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. … Co. v. Board of Public Works, 172 U. S. 32 -39, 19 Sup. Ct. 90, 43 L.

Sweet v. Continental-Leland Corp.

42 F.2d 382 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1930

That is was so authorized is well settled under Powers v. Blue Grass Building & Loan Ass’n (C. C.) 86 F. 705 , and Collins v. Williamson, 229 F. 59 (6 C. C. A.). … After determining which board was properly elected and functioning, it will be the duty of the court to turn the property of the corporation over to such board. The order is affirmed.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Cisneros

52 F.3d 1351 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1995

Steed and Charles Brown are the Executive Director and the Chairperson, respectively, of the Dayton Human Relations Council (“DHRC”). … Steed and the Reverend Charles Brown, the Executive Director and Chairperson, respectively, of the Dayton Human Relations Committee; and the City of Dayton, Ohio.

United States v. Espino-Ochoa

26 F. App'x 402 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 31, 2001

United States v. Brown, 988 F.2d 658, 660 (6th Cir.1993). Upon review, we conclude that EspinoOchoa’s argument is unavailing. … The decision in Apprendi was foreshadowed in Jones v.

Hood v. Keller

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 3, 2003

Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board, 997 F.2d 224 other than a prohibited appeal of the state-court judgment.”). … If the former, then the district No. 02-3402 Hood v. Keller, et al. 11 12 Hood v. Keller, et al.

Thompson v. United States, Small Business Administration

8 F. App'x 547 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 4, 2001

Res., Inc. v. Shelby Ins. Co., 84 F.3d 211, 214 (6th Cir.1996). … Fishburn v. Brown, 125 F.3d 979, 982 (6th Cir.1997). Therefore, the district court did not have jurisdiction to review this claim. *549 Accordingly, this court affirms the district court’s judgment.