Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.40s
Roberts v. Benefits Review Board
822 F.2d 636 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 1987
In Ramey v. … See also Moseley v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Central Plumbing Company
492 F.2d 1252 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 1974
NLRB v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 367 F.2d 55 (10th Cir. 1966). … Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass’n v. NLRB, 372 F.2d 569, 570 (6th Cir. 1967).
Cited 26 timesPublishedPlastic Masters, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
512 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 1975
Collins & Aikman Corp. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 722, 729 (4th Cir. 1967). … See also Collins & Aikman Corp. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 722 (CA4 1967) (payment of $7 to employee to be observer at election); NLRB v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedLowary v. Lexington Local Board of Education
854 F.2d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 1988
Law Rep. 784 William LOWARY & Sara Wyatt, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LEXINGTON LOCAL BOARD OF EDUCATION; Robert Whitney; Mark Plotnick; Susan Umbarger; James Bollinger; Rick Bell; and Helen Gilroy, Defendants-Appellees. … Tierney v. City of Toledo, 824 F.2d 1497 (6th Cir.1987).
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Ohio Masonic Home
892 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 18, 1989
We must uphold the conclusions of the Board where the record contains substantial evidence to support them. Emery Realty, Inc. v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 1259, 1262 (6th Cir.1988); 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v. … We also apply the substantial evidence test to the Board’s application of the law to the facts and may not displace any of the Board’s reasonable inferences. Emery Realty, 863 F.2d at 1262 ; NLRB v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Milton J. Garon
738 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1984
Union Carbide Corp. v. NLRB, 714 F.2d 657, 660 (6th Cir.1983) (citations omitted). Additionally, credibility determinations are normally a function for the Board. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp. v. … See, e.g., Dayco Corp. v. NLRB, 382 F.2d 577 , 579 (6th Cir.1967). The Board also found that Autoglass engaged in unlawful interrogation of several employees.
Cited 23 timesPublished481 F.3d 901 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 16, 2007
Vaughn then faxed wire instructions to Brown from Lincoln’s fax machine, and Brown finally wired $600,000 to Earth-board. … According to this “press release,” Earth-board stock would be exchanged on a “one for one basis,” apparently confirming the lies told to Brown.
Cited 72 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Pyromatics, Inc.
677 F.2d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 26, 1982
We conclude that the Board’s determination and order are supported by substantial evidence. There is substantial evidence to support a finding that the principal reason or “dominant motive” (Charge Card Assoc. v. … The Board’s order, 251 N.L.R.B. No. 141 (1980), is therefore enforced in full.
Cited 5 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Sweetwater Hospital Association
604 F.2d 454 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 10, 1979
Bay Medical Center, Inc. v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1174 (6th Cir. 1978). See also NLRB v. … See NLRB v. Cabot Carbon Co., 360 U.S. 203, 210-11 , 79 S.Ct. 1015 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1175 (1959). Indeed, the complete absence of by-laws or a formal structure is irrelevant. NLRB v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedWhirlpool Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
92 F. App'x 224 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 2004
While I concur with the judgment reached in the majority opinion, I write separately to highlight why the Board’s findings and application of law to particu *231 lar facts are supported by substantial evidence in the record … Though substantial evidence supports the Board’s affirmance of the ALJ’s finding that the counseling received by Pore and Hamilton constituted disciplinary action such that it affected a “term or condition” of employment
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Newtown Corporation
705 F.2d 873 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 3, 1983
The Board rejected New-town’s argument and, in a decision enforced by us, found that the company’s refusal to bargain violated section 8(a)(1) and (5). 251 N.L.R.B. 536 (1980) enforced NLRB v. … See Hartmann Luggage Co., 453 F.2d at 185 ; Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co. v. NLRB, 447 F.2d 396, 400 (6th Cir.1971). Therefore, we will enforce this portion of the Board’s order.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Porcelain Steels, Inc.
138 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 30, 1943
In National Labor Relations Board v. … This court, in National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHighland Superstores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
927 F.2d 918 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1991
In NLRB v. … Beverly Enterprises v.
Cited 31 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Austin Powder Company
350 F.2d 973 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 22, 1965
National Labor Relations Board v. Wagner Iron Works, 220 F.2d 126 , 138 (7th Cir. 1955). … B. v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 *977 S.Ct. 980, 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965), American Ship Building Co., v. N. L. R. B., 380 U.S. 300, 313 , 85 S.Ct. 955 , 13 L.Ed.2d 855 (1965).
Cited 9 timesPublishedClark's Gamble Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
407 F.2d 199 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 11, 1969
.; Universal Camera Corporation v. … N.L.R.B. v. Flomatic Corporation, 347 F.2d 74, 78 (2d Cir. 1965); Pulley v. N.L.R.B., 395 F.2d 870 (6th Cir. 1968); Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Zimnox Coal Company
336 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1964
Co. v. N. L. R. … The findings of the Board are “supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole” and therefore must stand. Section 10(e). Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.
Cited 10 timesPublishedStark Ceramics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
375 F.2d 202 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1967
So construed — and there was no exception to this conclusion of the Board — NLRB v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp., 373 U.S. 221 , 83 S.Ct. 1139 , 10 L.Ed.2d 308 (1963), citing National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 10 timesPublished228 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 5, 1956
In the subsequent decision, Brown v. … Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 .
Cited 97 timesPublishedModern Plastics Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
379 F.2d 201 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 22, 1967
Chicago Rawhide Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 221 F.2d 165 (C.A. 7, 1955), Coppus Engineering Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 240 F.2d 564 (C.A. 1, 1957), General Engineering Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Sharples Chemicals, 209 F.2d 645 (C.A. 6, 1954).
Cited 19 timesPublishedRailroad Ventures, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board
70 F. App'x 239 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 2003
(“RVI”) seeks review of a November 8, 2001 order of the Surface Transportation Board (the “Board”), which, among other things, modified an existing escrow arrangement established by the Board and clarified property interests … Ventures, Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd., 299 F.3d 523 (6th Cir.2002) (“Railroad Ventures, Inc.”). That appeal involved six separate petitions for review filed by RVI, as well as three filed by other parties.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna