Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

0.40s

  • Roberts v. Benefits Review Board

    822 F.2d 636 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 1987

    In Ramey v. … See also Moseley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Central Plumbing Company

    492 F.2d 1252 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 1974

    NLRB v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 367 F.2d 55 (10th Cir. 1966). … Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass’n v. NLRB, 372 F.2d 569, 570 (6th Cir. 1967).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Plastic Masters, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    512 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 1975

    Collins & Aikman Corp. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 722, 729 (4th Cir. 1967). … See also Collins & Aikman Corp. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 722 (CA4 1967) (payment of $7 to employee to be observer at election); NLRB v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Lowary v. Lexington Local Board of Education

    854 F.2d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 1988

    Law Rep. 784 William LOWARY & Sara Wyatt, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LEXINGTON LOCAL BOARD OF EDUCATION; Robert Whitney; Mark Plotnick; Susan Umbarger; James Bollinger; Rick Bell; and Helen Gilroy, Defendants-Appellees. … Tierney v. City of Toledo, 824 F.2d 1497 (6th Cir.1987).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Ohio Masonic Home

    892 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 18, 1989

    We must uphold the conclusions of the Board where the record contains substantial evidence to support them. Emery Realty, Inc. v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 1259, 1262 (6th Cir.1988); 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v. … We also apply the substantial evidence test to the Board’s application of the law to the facts and may not displace any of the Board’s reasonable inferences. Emery Realty, 863 F.2d at 1262 ; NLRB v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Milton J. Garon

    738 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1984

    Union Carbide Corp. v. NLRB, 714 F.2d 657, 660 (6th Cir.1983) (citations omitted). Additionally, credibility determinations are normally a function for the Board. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp. v. … See, e.g., Dayco Corp. v. NLRB, 382 F.2d 577 , 579 (6th Cir.1967). The Board also found that Autoglass engaged in unlawful interrogation of several employees.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Clinton D. Brown v. Earthboard Sports Usa, Inc. Hugh Jeffreys Jeffrey A. Vaughn Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation, D/B/A Sagemark Consulting

    481 F.3d 901 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

    Vaughn then faxed wire instructions to Brown from Lincoln’s fax machine, and Brown finally wired $600,000 to Earth-board. … According to this “press release,” Earth-board stock would be exchanged on a “one for one basis,” apparently confirming the lies told to Brown.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Pyromatics, Inc.

    677 F.2d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 26, 1982

    We conclude that the Board’s determination and order are supported by substantial evidence. There is substantial evidence to support a finding that the principal reason or “dominant motive” (Charge Card Assoc. v. … The Board’s order, 251 N.L.R.B. No. 141 (1980), is therefore enforced in full.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Sweetwater Hospital Association

    604 F.2d 454 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 10, 1979

    Bay Medical Center, Inc. v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1174 (6th Cir. 1978). See also NLRB v. … See NLRB v. Cabot Carbon Co., 360 U.S. 203, 210-11 , 79 S.Ct. 1015 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1175 (1959). Indeed, the complete absence of by-laws or a formal structure is irrelevant. NLRB v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Whirlpool Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    92 F. App'x 224 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 2004

    While I concur with the judgment reached in the majority opinion, I write separately to highlight why the Board’s findings and application of law to particu *231 lar facts are supported by substantial evidence in the record … Though substantial evidence supports the Board’s affirmance of the ALJ’s finding that the counseling received by Pore and Hamilton constituted disciplinary action such that it affected a “term or condition” of employment

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Newtown Corporation

    705 F.2d 873 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 3, 1983

    The Board rejected New-town’s argument and, in a decision enforced by us, found that the company’s refusal to bargain violated section 8(a)(1) and (5). 251 N.L.R.B. 536 (1980) enforced NLRB v. … See Hartmann Luggage Co., 453 F.2d at 185 ; Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co. v. NLRB, 447 F.2d 396, 400 (6th Cir.1971). Therefore, we will enforce this portion of the Board’s order.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Porcelain Steels, Inc.

    138 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 30, 1943

    In National Labor Relations Board v. … This court, in National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Highland Superstores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    927 F.2d 918 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1991

    In NLRB v. … Beverly Enterprises v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Austin Powder Company

    350 F.2d 973 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 22, 1965

    National Labor Relations Board v. Wagner Iron Works, 220 F.2d 126 , 138 (7th Cir. 1955). … B. v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 *977 S.Ct. 980, 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965), American Ship Building Co., v. N. L. R. B., 380 U.S. 300, 313 , 85 S.Ct. 955 , 13 L.Ed.2d 855 (1965).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Clark's Gamble Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    407 F.2d 199 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 11, 1969

    .; Universal Camera Corporation v. … N.L.R.B. v. Flomatic Corporation, 347 F.2d 74, 78 (2d Cir. 1965); Pulley v. N.L.R.B., 395 F.2d 870 (6th Cir. 1968); Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Zimnox Coal Company

    336 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1964

    Co. v. N. L. R. … The findings of the Board are “supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole” and therefore must stand. Section 10(e). Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Stark Ceramics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    375 F.2d 202 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1967

    So construed — and there was no exception to this conclusion of the Board — NLRB v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp., 373 U.S. 221 , 83 S.Ct. 1139 , 10 L.Ed.2d 308 (1963), citing National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Joyce Marie Clemons, an Infant by Gertrude Clemons, Her Mother and Next Friend v. The Board of Education of Hillsboro, Ohio, a Body Corporate

    228 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 5, 1956

    In the subsequent decision, Brown v. … Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 .

    Cited 97 timesPublished
  • Modern Plastics Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    379 F.2d 201 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 22, 1967

    Chicago Rawhide Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 221 F.2d 165 (C.A. 7, 1955), Coppus Engineering Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 240 F.2d 564 (C.A. 1, 1957), General Engineering Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Sharples Chemicals, 209 F.2d 645 (C.A. 6, 1954).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Railroad Ventures, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

    70 F. App'x 239 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 2003

    (“RVI”) seeks review of a November 8, 2001 order of the Surface Transportation Board (the “Board”), which, among other things, modified an existing escrow arrangement established by the Board and clarified property interests … Ventures, Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd., 299 F.3d 523 (6th Cir.2002) (“Railroad Ventures, Inc.”). That appeal involved six separate petitions for review filed by RVI, as well as three filed by other parties.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.