Case law

Keener Rubber, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

326 F.2d 968 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 27, 1964

Precision Fabricators, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., 204 F.2d 567, 568-569 , C.A.2nd; N. L. R. B. v. North Carolina Granite Corp., 201 F.2d 469, 470 , C.A.4th; N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Mt. Clemens Metal Products Co., 287 F.2d 790, 791 , C.A.6th; N. L. R. B. v. Greenfield Components Corp., 317 F.2d 85, 88 , C.A.1st; N. L. R. B. v. Syracuse Stamping Co., 208 F.2d 77, 79 , C.A.2nd.

Cross Company v. National Labor Relations Board

288 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 1961

On March 15, 1961, the Board petitioned for a rehearing, relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in National Labor Relations Board v. … v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Standard Transformer Co.

202 F.2d 846 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 31, 1953

B. v. … Genecov v. Federal Petroleum Board, 5 Cir., 146 F.2d 596, 598 , certiorari denied 324 U.S. 865 , 65 S.Ct. 913 , 89 L.Ed. 1420 ; Jordan v. American Eagle Fire Ins.

National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Incorporated

251 F.2d 183 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 17, 1958

This Court has recognized and referred to the fact that the Board does not exist for the adjudication of private rights. N.L.R.B. v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 136 F.2d 385, 387 ; Consumers Power Co. v. … In any event, the Board is not the real party in interest but is acting as agent for the em *187 ployees. Nathanson v. N.L.R.B., supra, 344 U.S. 25, 27 , 73 S.Ct. 80 , 97 L.Ed. 23 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Newtown Corporation

819 F.2d 677 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 1987

We believe that our decision in Houchens Market of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. … Garment Workers’ v. Quality Mfg. Co., 420 U.S. 276 , 281 n. 3, 95 S.Ct. 972 , 975 n. 3, 43 L.Ed.2d 189 (1975); NLRB v. Allied Prods. Corp., 548 F.2d 644, 653-54 (6th Cir.1977).

National Labor Relations Board v. Webcor Packaging, Inc.

118 F.3d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 11, 1997

NLRB v. … This is also not an instance in which the Board has departed from the Supreme Court's interpretation of the statute. Cf. Maislin Inds., U.S., Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.

389 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 1968

B. v. Capital Bakers, Inc., 351 F.2d 45, 51 (3d Cir. 1965). … Hence, Difco itself must bear the responsibility for not having obtained review by the Board of the Regional Director’s alleged errors. Cf. N. L. R. B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ridge Tool Co.

151 F.2d 947 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 26, 1945

conferred upon the Board and not upon us. … Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Board, 305 U.S. 364 , 59 S.Ct. 301 , 83 L.Ed. 221 . An order will be entered in accordance herewith.

National Labor Relations Board v. Eaton Mfg. Co.

175 F.2d 292 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 1949

National Labor Relations Board v. American White Cross Laboratories, Inc., 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 75 , and Local 2880 v. National Labor Relations Board, 9 Cir., 158 F.2d 365 . … Ohio Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 6 Cir., 115 F.2d 839 ; Atlas Underwear Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 6 Cir., 116 F.2d 1020 ; Press Co., Inc., v.

Delorean Cadillac, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

614 F.2d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 14, 1980

This Court is guided by the “substantial evidence” standard,' deferring to the Board’s decision if supported by such evidence. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v. … N.L.R.B. v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc., 327 F.2d 421 (6th Cir. 1964); N.L.R.B. v. Otsego Ski Club Hidden Valley, Inc., 542 F.2d 18 (6th Cir. 1976).

Roadway Express, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

831 F.2d 1285 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 29, 1987

Subsequently, the Board petitioned this court to remand the case to allow the Board to reconsider its decision in light of Lawson Co. v. … NLRB v. Baja’s Place, 733 F.2d 416, 421 (6th Cir.1984).

National Labor Relations Board v. Interurban Gas Company

354 F.2d 76 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 22, 1965

The Supreme Court on numerous occasions has passed upon the powers and duties of the Board under Section 10(c) of the Act. In Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. N. L. R. … In Phelps Dodge Corp. v. N. L. R.

NLRB v. VNS Fed. Servs., LLC

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 3, 2026

While we review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo, Rieth-Riley Constr. Co. v. NLRB, 173 F.4th 269, 274 (6th Cir. 2026) (citing NLRB v. … that Brown guaranteed him 40 hours of work a week, pointing to Brown’s testimony that he only promised to try to get Dillow 40 hours per week.

New York Life Ins. v. Board of Com'rs

106 F. 123 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1901

In the later case of Board of Education of Marion Tp. v. State. 51 Ohio St. 531 , 38 N. … Maryland v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 3 How. 534 , 11 L. Ed. 714 ; Board v. Lucas, 93 U. S. 108 , 23 L. Ed. 822 ; Board v. Skinkle, 140 U. S. 334 , 11 Sup. Ct. 790, 35 L. Ed. 446 .

Peabody Coal Company v. National Labor Relations Board

725 F.2d 357 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 10, 1984

The Board’s findings are summarized above. There is substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole to support the Board’s findings. See Universal Camera Corp v. … Although “[t]he Board, not the courts, has the delicate task of divining an employer’s motives,” NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Bangor Plastics, Inc.

392 F.2d 772 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 11, 1967

In light of N.L.R.B. v. Teamsters and Chauffeurs Union, supra, and Budd Mfg. Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 309 U.S. 206 , 60 S.Ct. 493 , 84 L.Ed. 704 , rehearing den. 309 U.S. 696 , 60 S.Ct. 611 , 84 L.Ed. *777 1036; N.L.R.B. v.

Kinnard v. Rutherford County Board of Education

109 F. App'x 85 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 2, 2004

for the district court’s grant of summary judgment was its conclusion that there was no causal connection between Kinnard’s protected activity (filing an EEOC charge and complaining about race discrimination to the School Board … Further, in denying summary judgment on Kinnard’s race discrimination claim, the trial court held that Kinnard had demonstrated the existence of a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the School Board’s proffered

Colangelo v. U. S. Board of Parole

517 F.2d 1404 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 16, 1975

517 F.2d 1404 Colangelo v. U. S. Board of Parole 75-1249 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 7/16/75 N.D.Ohio AFFIRMED

National Labor Relations Board v. Robert Haws Company

403 F.2d 979 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 22, 1968

Since there were no exceptions presented to the Board, there are no contestable issues before this Court and the July 6, 1965 remedial order of the Board is enforced. N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir.1963). The cases where the employees are available but fail to testify at the backpay hearing are inapposite here (see, e.g., N. L. R. B. v.

Wyandotte Savings Bank v. National Labor Relations Board

669 F.2d 386 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1982

ORDER This bargaining unit NLRB case raises basically the same issue concerning branch banking as this Court decided in Wayne Oakland Bank v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 666 (6th Cir. 1972). … Accordingly, the Court finds that the bargaining units found by the Board are inappropriate and enforcement of the Board order is denied.