Case law

Railroad Ventures, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

299 F.3d 523 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 1, 2002

Inc. v. … FDA v. Brown & Williamson accepting the STB’s terms "on the understanding" that it Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 130-132, 120 S.

National Labor Relations Board v. Carbide Tools, Inc.

492 F.2d 795 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 1974

ORDER This cause is before the court upon the motion of the National Labor Relations Board for entry of judgment by default enforcing its order herein; And it appearing that the Board’s application for enforcement of its … answer thereto as required by Rule 15, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, It is ordered that the Petitioner’s motion for judgment by default be and it hereby is granted and that the order of the National Labor Relations Board

Kinnard v. Rutherford County Board of Education

109 F. App'x 85 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 2, 2004

for the district court’s grant of summary judgment was its conclusion that there was no causal connection between Kinnard’s protected activity (filing an EEOC charge and complaining about race discrimination to the School Board … Further, in denying summary judgment on Kinnard’s race discrimination claim, the trial court held that Kinnard had demonstrated the existence of a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the School Board’s proffered

Colangelo v. U. S. Board of Parole

517 F.2d 1404 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 16, 1975

517 F.2d 1404 Colangelo v. U. S. Board of Parole 75-1249 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 7/16/75 N.D.Ohio AFFIRMED

National Labor Relations Board v. J. M. Lassing

284 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 1960

284 F.2d 781 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. J. M. LASSING, H. A. Thompson, Sr., Marshall O. Thompson, Mrs. J. R. Hanson, Mrs. Richard C. Patrick, Sr., and H. A. … B. v. Houston Chronicle Pub. Co., supra. 10 Enforcement of the Board's order is denied.

Coger v. Board of Regents of Tennessee

209 F.3d 485 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 4, 2000

In our prior opinion in this case, Coger v. … See Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, — U.S. -, -, 120 S.Ct. 631, 649-50 , 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000).

Gerald M. Brown Nick D. Anderson v. City of Niota, Tennessee L. S. Lee Eva Brakebill Alan Watkins Joel Parham

214 F.3d 718 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 31, 2000

On January 12, 1998, the Niota board of commissioners held a board meeting at which they discussed Brown’s employment. Defendant Lee made a motion to dismiss Brown from his employment with the police department. … In Reed v.

Union Carbide Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

714 F.2d 657 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 16, 1983

N.L.R.B. v. Container Corp., 649 F.2d at 1216 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Ostego Ski Club-Hidden Valley, Inc., 542 F.2d 18, 19 (6th Cir.1976) (per curiam); National Labor Relations Board v. Elias Bros. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 286-87 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 985-86 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965).

National Labor Relations Board v. Central Plumbing Company

492 F.2d 1252 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 1974

NLRB v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 367 F.2d 55 (10th Cir. 1966). … Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass’n v. NLRB, 372 F.2d 569, 570 (6th Cir. 1967).

Pepsico, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

382 F.2d 265 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 11, 1967

Pepsico was not a party to the proceeding before the Board. … While we are cited to no Labor Board case deciding this precise question, a somewhat analogous case is Schenley Distillers Corp. v. United States, 61 F.

Charge Card Association v. National Labor Relations Board

653 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 7, 1981

B. v. Paschall Truck Lines, Inc., 469 F.2d 74, 76 (6th Cir. 1972); Hughes & Hatcher, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., 393 F.2d 557 (6th Cir. 1968). … B. v.

Oakwood Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board

983 F.2d 698 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 1993

In NLRB v. … The Board’s judgments on retroactivity should normally be upheld unless manifest injustice can be shown. See Hickman Harbor Serv. v. NLRB, 739 F.2d 214 , 218 (6th Cir.1984).

Baker v. Adams County/Ohio Valley School Board

86 F. App'x 104 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 12, 2004

Adland v. Russ. 307 F.3d 471, 477-78 (6th Cir.2002). … The “purpose prong” of the Lemon test In Lemon v.

Kitchen Fresh, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

716 F.2d 351 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 26, 1983

See Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 , 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803); the Board is bound to apply the law of the circuit in which a case arises. PPG Industries, Inc. v. … However, the Board cannot, as it did here, choose to ignore the decision of this court as if it had no force or effect. Absent reversal, the decision is the law which the Board must follow.” Ithaca College v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Dixie Terminal Co.

210 F.2d 538 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 26, 1954

B. v. F. H. McGraw & Co., 6 Cir., 206 F.2d 635, 640 ; N. L. R. B. v. Aleo Feed Mills, 5 Cir., 133 F.2d 419 ; Joy Silk Mills v. N. L. R. B., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 185 F.2d 732, 743-744 ; N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. West Ohio Gas Co., 6 Cir., 172 F.2d 685, 688 ; N. L. R. B. v. MylanSparta Co., 6 Cir., 166 F.2d 485, 491 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Bear Archery

587 F.2d 812 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 10, 1977

P 10,145 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, Local Union No. 1903, of the International Union, UAW, Intervenor, v. BEAR ARCHERY, Division of Victor Comptometer Corporation, Respondent. No. 76-2041. … Two of the three-member panel of the Board rejected the company's contentions.

Micah Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees

639 F.3d 711 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 4, 2011

No. 10-1084 Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Page 7 Board of Trustees, et al. … Oakland University Page 10 Board of Trustees, et al. attorney’s fees. See McQueary v. Conway, 614 F.3d 591 (6th Cir. 2010).

National Labor Relations Board v. Nelson Manufacturing Company

326 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 1964

There is, therefore, substantial evidence to support the Boards’ finding that respondent violated Section 8(a) (1) of the Act. United Fireworks Mfg. Co. v. N. L. R. B. (C.A. 6), 252 F.2d 428, 480 ; N. L. R. B. V. … B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Newtown Corporation

705 F.2d 873 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 3, 1983

The Board rejected New-town’s argument and, in a decision enforced by us, found that the company’s refusal to bargain violated section 8(a)(1) and (5). 251 N.L.R.B. 536 (1980) enforced NLRB v. … See Hartmann Luggage Co., 453 F.2d at 185 ; Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co. v. NLRB, 447 F.2d 396, 400 (6th Cir.1971). Therefore, we will enforce this portion of the Board’s order.

National Labor Relations Board v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.

389 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 1968

B. v. Capital Bakers, Inc., 351 F.2d 45, 51 (3d Cir. 1965). … Hence, Difco itself must bear the responsibility for not having obtained review by the Board of the Regional Director’s alleged errors. Cf. N. L. R. B. v.