Case law

Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. v. Metropolitan Knox Solid Waste Authority, Inc.

970 F.2d 199 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 23, 1992

The city and county both appointed members to the Waste Authority’s board of directors. … The board was responsible for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Facility, although the county could initiate proceedings to remove board members “for cause.”

Valentia Khozhaynova v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 2011

Standard of Review Because the Board issued an independent decision, we review the Board’s determination including any parts of the immigration judge’s reasoning referenced by the Board. Khalili v. … And while the Board, citing to Pilica v.

Carras v. Williams

807 F.2d 1286 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 15, 1986

See Juidice v. … Carras' attempt to enjoin Ray and Ann Priddy from proceeding before the California Horse Racing Board, however, may yet present a proper case for abstention. Cf. Ohio Civil Rights Commission v.

United States v. Winkle

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 21, 2007

United States v. Brown, 147 F.3d 477, 489 (6th Cir. 1998) (quoting United States v. Jones, 102 F.3d 804, 807 (6th Cir. 1996)). … United States v.

Capobianco v. Summers

377 F.3d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 23, 2004

v. … Florida Bar, 515 U.S. at 632 (citing Board chiropractors was not sufficient to distinguish this case from of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y. v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469, 480 Florida Bar in that respect.

Tapucu v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 9, 2005

When the Board summarily affirms an IJ’s order, it is the decision of the IJ that we review. Denko v. INS, 351 F.3d 717, 723 (6th Cir. 2003). … True, it is not for us to tell the Board when it should apply its streamlining procedures, which in this case amounted to affirming without opinion the IJ’s two-page opinion. See Zheng v.

Bach v. First Union Natl Bk

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 2007

See Westside Mothers v. … No. 06-3660 Bach v.

United States v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 2006

Johnson v. … Harrell, in turn, told another co-conspirator, Gary Brown, to bring the weapon, and Brown complied.

John W. Vicory v. Robert R. Walton, Sheriff of Butler County and John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecutor

721 F.2d 1062 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 28, 1984

Logan v. … The recent case of Patsy v. Florida Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982), is not to the contrary.

Moses v. Coble

23 F. App'x 391 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 31, 2001

v. … Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 , 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Brooks v. Celeste, 39 F.3d 125, 127 (6th Cir.1994).

First American Title Co. v. Devaugh

480 F.3d 438 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 22, 2007

The sole issue on appeal is whether these registers’ challenged practices are exempt from the Sherman Act under the “state action” immunity doctrine, which was first set forth in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943). … M.C.L. § 46.11(m) provides that a county board of commissioners may “[e]stablish rules and regulations in reference to the management of the interest and business concerns of the county as the board considers necessary and

Charles Jones v. William Metzger, Homer Roberts

456 F.2d 854 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 14, 1972

Dee. 14, 1971), quoting Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 183 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961). Prisoners, are entitled to the same consideration afforded other civil rights litigants. See Haines v. … See McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S. Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963). In these circumstances, we hold that the district court properly assumed jurisdiction over this case.

Wayne LaFountain v. Shirlee Harry

716 F.3d 944 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 22, 2013

See Brown v. Rhode Island, No. 12-1403, 2013 WL 646489, at *1 (1st Cir. Feb. 22, 2013) (per curiam); Smith v. Knox Cnty. Jail, 666 F.3d 1037, 1039–40 (7th Cir. 2012) (per curiam); Hale v. … King, 642 F.3d 492, 503 (5th Cir. 2011) (per curiam); Hughes v. Banks, 290 F. App’x 960, 962 (8th Cir. 2008); Nottingham v. Sherill, 131 F. App’x 427, 427 (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam); Brown v.

Idit Dobbs-Weinstein, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Vanderbilt University, Defendant-Appellee

185 F.3d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 26, 1999

Zahorik v. … Board of Regents, 769 F.2d 1235, 1240 (7th Cir.1985) (requiring the plaintiff to show as a fourth element of the prima facie case that "an applicant not in the protected class was granted tenure”); Tanik v.

Walker v. Hughes

558 F.2d 1247 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 24, 1977

In Board of Regents v. … Board of Regents v.

Nixon v. Kent County

76 F.3d 1381 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 2, 1996

76 F.3d 1381 64 USLW 2485 Debra NIXON, Johnny Griffin, Sr., Bill Brown, Juan Jimenez, Sara Ramirez, and Marshall Chavez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. … FACTS 3 6 Kent County, Michigan, is governed by a Board of Commissioners, and each member is elected from a single-member district. 4 The Board has consisted of twenty-one members since its inception in 1968.

Victoria Marquez Talavera v. Thomas M. Pederson, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service

334 F.2d 52 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1964

See: Blagaic v. Flagg, 304 F.2d 623 , C.A.7th; Roumeliotis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 304 F.2d 453 , C.A.7th, cert. denied, 371 U.S. 921 , 83 S.Ct. 288 , 9 L.Ed.2d 230 ; Lopez-Blanco v. … Pearson v. Williams, 202 U.S. 281, 284-285 , 26 S.Ct. 608 , 50 L.Ed. 1029 ; Mannerfrid v. Brownell, D.C., 145 F.Supp. 55 , affirmed, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 171 , 238 F.2d 32 ; Jason v.

Carlton v. Trimble

93 F. App'x 761 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 19, 2004

See Knuckles El v. Toombs, 215 F.3d 640, 642 (6th Cir.2000); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). The prisoner has the burden of demonstrating that he has exhausted these remedies. … See Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 . Unexhausted claims should be dismissed without prejudice. See Hartsfield v. Vidor, 199 F.3d 305, 310 (6th Cir.1999).

Minneapolis, St. P. &. S. S. M. Ry. Co. v. Galvin

54 F.2d 202 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 18, 1931

Sansom v. Sou. Ry. Co., 111 F. 887, 889 (C. C. A. 6); Bronson v. Oakes, 76 F. 734, 740 (C. C. A. 8); Palen v. Wheelock, 13 F.(2d) 34, 35 (C. C. A. 8); Scott v. N. Y. Cent. R. Co., 216 App. Div. 623 , 216 N. Y. … Gunning v. Cooley, 281 U. S. 90, 94 , 50 S. Ct. 231 , 74 L. Ed. 720 ; Rochford v. Penna. Co., 174 F. 81, 83 (C. C. A. 6).

Frank W. White v. Craven Crowell, Chairman, Tva Board

66 F.3d 327 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 20, 1995

WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Craven CROWELL, Chairman, TVA Board, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-5366. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Sept. 20, 1995. Before: MILBURN, GUY and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges. … Corp. v. U.S. Chem. Co., 43 F.3d 244 , 250 (6th Cir.1994). White has not set forth a prima facie case of race discrimination, see St. Mary's Honor Center v.