Case law

Shearer v. Dehner

25 F.3d 1050 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 11, 1994

Miquel Dwyne SHEARER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tony DEHNER, Individually, and in his official capacity; Glen Brown, Individually, and in his official capacity; R. … See Wilson v. Seiter, 111 S.Ct. 2321, 2324 (1991); Walker v. Mintzes, 771 F.2d 920, 927 (6th Cir.1985).

James Bailey, Harley Hubbs v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services

777 F.2d 1167 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 5, 1985

See Monroe v. Board of Commissioners, 505 F.2d 109 (6th Cir.1974). … We find this argument unpersuasive for as we noted in Lewis v.

Baugham v. Battered Women, Inc.

211 F. App'x 432 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 20, 2006

See Clark, 400 F.3d at 347 ; accord Harris v. … See Randolph v.

Charles Jones v. William Metzger, Homer Roberts

456 F.2d 854 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 14, 1972

Dee. 14, 1971), quoting Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 183 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961). Prisoners, are entitled to the same consideration afforded other civil rights litigants. See Haines v. … See McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S. Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963). In these circumstances, we hold that the district court properly assumed jurisdiction over this case.

Herbert Clyde Squires v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

689 F.2d 1276 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 21, 1982

pursuant to the Board’s previous order and 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (e). … INS, 612 F.2d 457 (9th Cir. 1980); Winestock v. INS, 576 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1978); and, as the Board of Immigration Appeals pointed out, the Canadian crime of “false pretences” plainly has such a requirement.

Holly Schulkers v. Elizabeth Kammer

955 F.3d 520 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 30, 2020

In a phone conversation, Brown told Campbell to lift the Prevention Plan. … And, in Cleveland Board of Education v.

Tiger Lily, LLC v. HUD

5 F.4th 666 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 23, 2021

See Brown v. Sec’y, U.S. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 20-14210, 2021 WL 2944379, at *2 (11th Cir. … Grp. v. EPA., 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014) (plurality opinion) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 160 (2000)).

Squier Distributing Company v. Local 7, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America

801 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 15, 1986

Compare NLRB v. … See Abilities & Goodwill, Inc. v. NLRB, 612 F.2d 6, 9 (6th Cir.1979). 18 We decline to adopt the per se rule impliedly supported by the Board.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ford Brothers, Inc.

881 F.2d 1076 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 1989

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. FORD BROTHERS, INC., Respondent. No. 89-5756. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 9, 1989. … judgment enforcing in full the backpay provision of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, the Board, on October 17, 1988, issued its Supplemental Decision and Order fixing the amount of backpay due the discriminatees

Alain Cuevas-Nuno v. William Barr

969 F.3d 331 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 2020

The Immigration and Nationality Act makes clear that parties must exhaust their claims with the Board of Immigration Appeals before we can review them. … No. 20-3034 Cuevas-Nuno v. Barr Page 3 Cuevas-Nuno then appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”).

National Labor Relations Board v. Adair Standish Corporation

875 F.2d 866 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 1989

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ADAIR STANDISH CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 88-5813. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. May 15, 1989. Before RYAN and ALAN E. … We have previously rejected Board arguments that an abuse of discretion standard should apply to cases in which the Board has applied its rules to a particular fact situation. NLRB v.

Frank H. Mason Trust v. Commissioner

136 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 1943

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. “Exclusions from Gross Income. … Burnet v.

Murphy G. Miller, Jr., and Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellant. W. S. Sosna, and Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellant. David M. Garrison v. United States of America, Jack Comer v. United States of America, T. L. Gann v. United States of America, David G. Brown v. United States of America, Ruby Kenner v. United States

399 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 6, 1968

BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. Ruby KENNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 17921-17929. … McDonald v. United States, 315 F. 2d 796 (6th Cir. 1963); Hulette v. United States, 315 F.2d 826 (6th Cir. 1963). Taxpayers rely on United States v.

Gerald J. Streeter v. National Labor Relations Board

865 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 12, 1988

STREETER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-1873. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 12, 1988. 1 Before MERRITT and RALPH B. … Co. v. United States, 515 F.2d 97, 99 (5th Cir.1975) (per curiam), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 954 (1976).

United States v. Michael Smith

749 F.3d 465 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 2014

Board). … Another email, dated February 18, 2009, contained a list of nine possible board- certified geological experts.

Valentia Khozhaynova v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 2011

Standard of Review Because the Board issued an independent decision, we review the Board’s determination including any parts of the immigration judge’s reasoning referenced by the Board. Khalili v. … And while the Board, citing to Pilica v.

Warren Tel. Co. v. Commissioner

128 F.2d 503 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 1942

In Helvering v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, 311 U.S. 46 , 61 S.Ct. 109 , 85 L.Ed. 29 , and its companion case, Crane-Johnson Co. v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Jones v. Seabold

11 F. App'x 486 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 22, 2001

Collard, v. Kentucky Bd. of Nursing, 896 F.2d 179 , 182 (6th Cir.1990). … Cf Brown v. Morgan, 209 F.3d 595, 596 (6th Cir.2000). Therefore, both district court orders are affirmed. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Balkwill v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

77 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 7, 1935

Burnet, Commissioner, v. Leininger, supra; Luce v. Burnet, Commissioner, 60 App. D. C. 393, 55 F.(2d) 751 ; Battleson v. Commissioner, 62 F.(2d) 125 (C. C. A. 9); Mitchel v. Bowers, Collector, 15 F.(2d) 287 (C. C. … The orders of the Board of Tax Appeals are affirmed.

Sharon R. Pfennig v. Household Credit Services, Inc., and Mbna America Bank, N.A.

295 F.3d 522 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 3, 2002

The Supreme Court has also specifically said that in interpreting the TILA, the Federal Reserve Board’s opinions construing the Act should be dispositive unless “demonstrably irrational.” Ford Motor Credit Company v. … Begala v. PNC Bank, Ohio, National Ass’n, 163 F.3d 948, 950 (6th Cir.1998). The majority’s interpretation of § 1605(a) might well be a reasonable one; but so is that of the Federal Reserve Board.