Case law

Miles T. Jackman v. National Labor Relations Board

784 F.2d 759 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1986

The Supreme Court has stated that “the Board’s General Counsel has unreviewable discretion to refuse to institute an unfair labor practice complaint.” Vaca v. … A previous panel of this court granted the Board’s motions to dismiss those actions. Jackman v. NLRB, 720 F.2d 679 (6th Cir.1983) (Order). 8 .

APX International v. National Labor Relations Board

144 F.3d 995 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 29, 1998

The Board has not established “that a bargaining order is the ‘only satisfactory remedy.”’ Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 1292, 1301 (6th Cir.1988) (quoting NLRB v. … See also NLRB v. Taylor Machine Products, Inc., 136 F.3d 507, 519 (6th Cir.1998). V. CONCLUSION In sum, we REVERSE the Board’s finding that the Huddleston discharge was improper for the reasons stated above.

General Motors Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

303 F.2d 428 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 8, 1962

Meade Electric Co. v. Hagberg, 129 Ind.App. 631 , 159 N.E.2d 409 . The Supreme Court of Kansas, however, reached a different conclusion in construing the constitution of that state. Higgins v. … The order of the National Labor Relations Board is set aside and the Board’s request for enforcement is denied.

Colfor Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

838 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 31, 1988

The Board’s remedial authority is “a broad discretionary one, subject to limited judicial review,” Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. … United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 583 , 86 S.Ct. 1698, 1710 , 16 L.Ed.2d 778 (1966).

National Labor Relations Board v. Pentre Electric, Inc.

998 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 8, 1993

Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). We review the Board’s conclusions of law de novo. Wilson v. … Furthermore, in our opinion, the Board has erroneously interpreted section 8(c) and NLRB v.

Goss v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Knoxville

301 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 1962

v. … It was further ordered that the board should put the plan as approved into effect. 11 On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court decided, in Brown v.

City Disposal Systems, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

683 F.2d 1005 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 22, 1982

While Brown’s isolated comment alluded to the safety of all the men, it was not relied on by the Board to evidence concerted action. … Compare NLRB v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., supra, and NLRB v. Guernsey-Muskingum Electric Co-operative, Inc., 285 F.2d 8 (6th Cir. 1960) with Bay-Wood Industries, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Hekman Furniture Co.

207 F.2d 561 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 16, 1953

The decision of the board was in consonance with the opinion of this court in National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. … See also National Labor Relations Board v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co., 2 Cir., 187 F. 2d 947 ; Aluminum Ore Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 131 F.2d 485, 487 , 147 A.L.R. 1 .

Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

99 F.2d 1003 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1938

1938, directing that the transcript filed in 6 Cir., 99 F.2d 1009 , should be treated as filed in this cause is denied. (7) The motion of respondent filed June 2, 1938, to remand this cause to the National Labor Relations Board

National Labor Relations Board v. Putnam Tool Company

290 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 1961

It has been held, however, that a finding of the Board need not be supported by direct evidence. See: Radio Officer’s Union of Commercial Telegrapher’s Union v. N. L. R. … When the Board draws inferences from the evidence the Court of Appeals has no power to review those inferences. N. L. R. B. v. U. S. Truck Co., Inc., 6 Cir., 1942, 124 F.2d 887 .

Trw, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

393 F.2d 771 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 24, 1968

N.L.R.B. v. Shawnee Industries, Inc., 333 F.2d 221, 225 (10th Cir. 1964); National Labor Relations Board v. … No. 130, which were approved in National Labor Relations Board v. Avondale Mills, 242 F.2d 669, 671 (5th Cir. 1957), affirmed, National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Rawac Plating Company

422 F.2d 1259 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 1970

B. v. Challenge-Cook Bros. of Ohio, Inc., 374 F.2d 147, 152 (6th Cir. 1967). Our examination of the record discloses substantial evidence to support the findings of the Board. … B. v. Dal-Tex Optical Co., 310 F.2d 58, 62 (5th Cir. 1962); Lloyd Fry Roofing Co. v. NLRB, 222 F.2d 938, 940 (1st Cir., 1955). The order of the Board is enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Hoppes Mfg. Co.

170 F.2d 962 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 29, 1948

National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183 . Cf. National Labor Relations Board v. Blair Quarries, Inc., 4 Cir., 152 F.2d 25 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 326 U.S. 376, 383, 384 , 66 S.Ct. 203 , 90 L.Ed. 145 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Elyria Telephone Co., 6 Cir., 158 F.2d 868, 872 .

National Labor Relations Board v. The Westin Hotel

758 F.2d 1126 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 1985

The Board’s “broad discretionary” authority in awarding backpay as a remedy for unfair labor practice is firmly established. NLRB v. J.H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. … Interurban Gas Co., 354 F.2d 76, 78 (6th Cir.1965) (“substantial evidence” standard of review applicable to Board’s backpay awards). See also NLRB v. E.I.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 334

481 F.3d 875 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 2007

"Our deference to findings of fact runs in favor of the Board, not in favor of the ALJ." W.F. Bolin Co. v. NLRB, 70 F.3d 863, 870 (6th Cir.1995). … NLRB v.

Lawson Milk Company v. National Labor Relations Board

317 F.2d 756 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 1963

B. v. Houston Chronicle Pub. Co., 211 F.2d 848, 854 (C.A.5, 1954) ; N. L. R. B. v. Wagner Iron Works, 220 F.2d 126 , 133 (C.A.7, 1955). … In Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

Raser Tanning Company v. National Labor Relations Board

276 F.2d 80 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 20, 1960

In National Labor Relations Board v. … See also Consumers Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 6 Cir., 113 F.2d 38 at page 42; Stokely Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 193 F.2d 736 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Flemingsburg Manufacturing Co.

300 F.2d 182 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 1962

B. v. Ford, 170 F.2d 735, 739 (CA 6); Old King Cole v. N. L. R. B., 250 F.2d 791 (CA 6). … B. v. Clark, et al., 176 F.2d 341, 344 (CA 3, 1949). Enforcement of the Board’s order is decreed.

National Labor Relations Board v. Roselon Southern, Inc.

382 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 25, 1967

Ohio Power Co. v. N. L. R. B., 176 F.2d 385 , 11 A.L.R.2d 243 (C.A. 6, 1949); Eastern Greyhound Lines v. N. L. R. B., 337 F.2d 84 (C.A. 6, 1964). … B. v. Beaver Meadow Creamery, Inc., 215 F.2d *248 247 (C.A. 3, 1954); and Eastern Greyhound Lines v. N. L. R. B., 337 F.2d 84 (C.A. 6, 1964), supra.

Kux Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

890 F.2d 804 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 6, 1989

Thus, the burden of proof on parties seeking to have a Board-supervised election set aside is a “heavy one.” Harlan #4 Coal Co. v. … We agree with the Board that the alleged threats and misconduct did not taint the entire election. See NLRB v. Griffith Oldsmobile, Inc., 455 F.2d 867, 870 (8th Cir.1972) (quoting Manning, Maxwell & Moore v.