Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.60s
Enrique Amaya v. United States
71 F.4th 487 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 23, 2023
Brown, No. 20-6409, 2022 WL 2135265 (6th Cir. Mar. 16, 2022) (order). But that unpublished order does not bind us, nor does it address the question we face here. … Brown involved the First Step Act and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)—neither of which requires that a petitioner be seeking “release” from “custody.” See 2022 WL 2135265, at *1.
Cited 4 timesPublished527 F.3d 577 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 29, 2008
United States v. Buckley, 934 F.2d 84, 87-88 (6th Cir.1991) (second, third, and fourth alterations in original) (quoting United States v. Brown, 915 F.2d 219, 223 (6th Cir.1990)). B. … [the Sixth Circuit] review[s][the] conclusions de novo.’ ” Buckley, 934 F.2d at 87-88 (alterations in original) (quoting United States v. Brown, 915 F.2d 219, 223 (6th Cir.1990)). B.
Cited 68 timesPublished86 F. App'x 959 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 2004
Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir.2000). … McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir.1997).
Cited 1 timesPublishedLeatha Benita Sims, by Her Next Friend and Mother, Linda Gail Sims v. William Waln and Max Launder
536 F.2d 686 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 15, 1976
Glaser v. Marietta, 351 F.Supp. 555 (W.D.Pa.1972), Sims v. Board of Education, 329 F.Supp. 678 (D.N.M.1971). … Baker v. Owen, 395 F.Supp. 294 (M.D.N.C.1975) (three judge court) aff’d mem. 423 U.S. 907 , 96 S.Ct. 210 , 46 L.Ed.2d 137 (1975). Dixon v. Youngstown Board of Education, supra, Gonyaw v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedMakoka v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
28 F. App'x 476 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 29, 2002
The Board denied reconsideration on the basis of its decision in Matter of J-J- 211. & N. Dec.976 (BIA 1997), in which the Board declined to follow the policy arguments of Houston v. … The petitioner was found removable on the basis of his convictions for aggravated felonies; therefore, direct review of the Board’s decision is precluded. Calcano-Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedImam Ali Abdullah Akbar v. J. P. Canney
634 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 5, 1980
Brown, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Marc S. Kadetz, Columbus, Ohio, for defendants-appellees. Before KENNEDY and MARTIN, Circuit Judges; PECK, Senior Circuit Judge. … See Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 , 540 n. 23, 99 S.Ct. 1861 , 1874 n. 23, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979).
Cited 11 timesPublishedVacuum Oil Co. v. Land Title Guaranty & Trust Co.
80 F.2d 476 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 1935
Co. v. Austin Machinery Corporation, 35 F.(2d) 842, 843 (C.C.A.6). In Brown v. Duffin, 13 F.(2d) 708, 710 , we said: “A judgment in equity that defendant first account, and then pay over, is a judgment in personam.” … Sutton v. English, 246 U.S. 199, 205 , 38 S.Ct. 254 , 62 L.Ed. 664 ; Fidelity Nat. Bank v. Swope, 274 U.S. 123, 132 , 47 S.Ct. 511 , 71 L.Ed. 959 ; Brown v. Duffin, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublished137 F.3d 343 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 3, 1997
He tendered his boarding pass to the agent at the podium before a boarding announcement was made and eventually was the first passenger to board the plane. … Considering Avery’s actions peculiar up to that point, Officer Parker retrieved Avery’s boarding pass after Avery boarded and asked the gate agent for ticketing information.
Cited 145 timesPublished956 F.2d 1339 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 21, 1992
pushed Browning. … See Dixon v. International Harvester Co., 754 F.2d 573, 580 (5th Cir.1985); Midcontinent Broadcasting Co. v. North Central Airlines, 471 F.2d 357, 358 (8th Cir.1973); see also Sumitomo Bank of California v.
Abrogated on other grounds by Weisgram v. Marley Co., 528 U.S. 440 (2000)Cited 58 timesPublished204 F. 32 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 11, 1913
Laden v. Meck (C. C. A. 6th Cir.) 130 Fed. 877 , 65 C. C. A. 361 ; Thomas v. Board of Trustees, 195 U. S. 207, 210 , 25 Sup. Ct. 24, 49 L. Ed. 160 . … We think the case distinguishable from Thomas v. Board of Trustees, supra, and Fred Macey Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedBrudno v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
138 F.2d 779 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 29, 1943
To sustain the decision of the Board, counsel for the Government mainly rely upon Moline Properties, Inc., v. Commissioner, 319 U.S. 436 , 63 S.Ct. 1132 , 87 L. Ed. 1499 . … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (now the Tax Court of the United States) is affirmed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMyers v. Secretary Of Health And Human Services
893 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 11, 1990
In Crofoot v. … The Board upheld the employee's removal on the charge of notoriously disgraceful conduct.
Cited 16 timesPublishedFranklin Federal Savings Bank v. Director, Office Of Thrift Supervision
927 F.2d 1332 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 12, 1991
Feres v. … ."); Richter v.
Cited 2 timesPublished757 F.2d 796 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 26, 1985
See Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. … See also Champion Int'l Corp. v. Brown, 731 F.2d 1406, 1409 (9th Cir. 1984) (broad preemption to prevent conflicting and inconsistent state regulation); American *801 Progressive Life & Health Ins. Co. of New York v.
Cited 57 timesPublished133 F.3d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 16, 1998
Wiley v. United States, 20 F.3d 222, 224 (6th Cir.1994). … Int’l Pension Fund v. Ralph’s Grocery Co., 118 F.3d 1018, 1021 (4th Cir.1997); see also Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedEarl Patton Coal Company v. Patton
848 F.2d 668 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 1988
Sec. 9501 . 2 This court must affirm the Board's decision if it is supported by substantial evidence and if it is in accordance with applicable law. Kolesar v. … Begley v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. A. T. Beaty, United States of America v. R. J. Barcroft
288 F.2d 653 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1961
Union Tool Co. v. Wilson, 259 U.S. 107, 112 , 42 S.Ct. 427 , 66 L.Ed. 848 . Misapplication of the law to the facts is in itself an abuse of discretion. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. … Clemons, et al. v. Board of Education of Hillsboro, Ohio, et al., 6 Cir., 228 F.2d 853, 857 .
Cited 32 timesPublishedBlanche Barber v. Charter Twp. of Springfield, Mich.
31 F.4th 382 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 11, 2022
On June 6, 2019, members of the Springfield Township Board (“the Board”) met to discuss these options and ultimately recommended removing the Dam. … On June 6, 2019, the Board met to discuss the Feasibility Study and assess its options for the Dam’s future. After weighing seven proposals, the Board recommended removing the Dam.
Cited 34 timesPublishedJames M. Mathews v. Ronald C. Marshall and William Brown
872 F.2d 1026 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 14, 1989
MATHEWS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald C. MARSHALL and William Brown, Respondents-Appellees. No. 88-3581. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 14, 1989. Before BOYCE F. … State v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHolmes Limestone Co. v. Cecil B. Andrus
655 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 6, 1981
Following Ohio’s administrative procedure, Holmes Limestone appealed that order to the Ohio Reclamation Board of Review. A hearing was held before the Board on March 5, 1980. … In Abbott Laboratories v.
Cited 15 timesPublished
Ask Donna