Case law

Mack S. S. Co. v. Thompson

176 F. 499 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1910

No. 9,360; Porter v. The Sea Witch, 3 Woods, 75 , Fed. Cas. No. 11,289; The W. J. Walsh, 5 Ben. 72 , Fed. Cas. No. 17,922. … In the case of Davidson v. Baldwin, 79 Fed. 95 , 24 C. C.

Jos. Denunzio Fruit Co. v. Commissioner

49 F.2d 41 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 1931

It might reasonably be said that through the affiliated interests of Denunzio and the Seholtz brothers petitioner controlled the business of the Spivey Company, but since the ease of United States v. Cleveland, P. & E. … S. v. Cleveland, P. & E. R. Co., supra.

Digitron Packaging, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

995 F.2d 1066 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 1993

NLRB v. … Colfor, Inc. v. NLRB, 678 F.2d 655, 656 (6th Cir.1982); accord NLRB v.

United States v. Floyd W. Hawkins and Bennie M. Brown

915 F.2d 1573 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 9, 1990

See United States v. … See Baker v.

Arthur v. City of Toledo, Ohio

782 F.2d 565 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 2, 1986

Before KENNEDY and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. CORNELIA G. … See also Robinson v. 12 Lofts Realty, Inc., 610 F.2d 1032, 1036-37 (2d Cir.1979); Resident Advisory Board v.

Lamont Heard v. Patricia Caruso

351 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 27, 2009

I (Brown Aff. ¶¶ 6-8). Under MDOC policy, Heard’s STG II designation automatically resulted in his transfer to a Level V maximum-security facility. … See Bellamy v.

Lamont Bernard Heard v. Yarnice Strange

127 F.4th 630 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 29, 2025

Brown v. Morgan, 209 F.3d 595, 596 (6th Cir. 2000). Other circuits do the same. Battle v. Ledford, 912 F.3d 708, 718–19 (4th Cir. 2019); Gonzalez v. Hasty, 651 F.3d 318, 323– 24 (2d Cir. 2011); Brown v. … Brown, 209 F.3d at 596. Michigan tolls for the time a prisoner spends trying to litigate his unexhausted claims.

John Heuss, and the Travelers Insurance Company, Intervening v. Rockwell Standard Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

495 F.2d 1207 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 26, 1974

The platform was made up of random length boards which extended beyond the frame, and, had neither guardrails nor clamps or cleats to prevent the boards from sliding or tipping. … Bunda v. Hardwick, 376 Mich. 640 , 138 N.W.2d 305 (1965); Rumptz v. Leahey, 26 Mich.App. 438 , 182 N.W.2d 614 (1970); Bishop v. Wolinski, 16 Mich.App. 753 , 168 N.W.2d 651 (1969).

prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,981 Roseville Plaza Limited Partnership v. United States Gypsum Company

31 F.3d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 28, 1994

The Michigan Supreme Court’s recent decision in Moll v. … That court went on to note that “[t]he board was aware of its ‘injury and its likely cause in November 1979 ... and the board cannot circumvent the statute by arguing that its claim did not accrue until a time of its own

Ming Yang v. City of Wyoming, Mich.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 2015

He also informed the Board that the Yangs were paying the taxes on the property. The Yangs were not present at this hearing. Nonetheless, the Board of Housing Appeals approved demolition of the building. … The letter states that the “Board of Housing Appeals affirmed the City’s Notice and Order to Demolish,” R. 48-22 at 2, but the Yangs never received that detailed notice, and the Board was well aware of this fact.

United States v. Mareco Caraway

411 F.3d 679 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 2005

Caraway had been wearing a brown jacket and long-sleeved shirt, but that they were removed when the two men struggled the night of Mr. Caraway’s arrest. … United States v. Chance, 306 F.3d 356, 385 (6th Cir.2002); United States v. Tejada, 956 F.2d 1256, 1266 (2d Cir.1992).

Wadsworth Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

44 F.2d 762 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 5, 1930

La Belle Iron Works v. U. S., 256 U. S. 377, 388 , 41 S. Ct. 528 , 65 L. Ed. 998 . … It follows that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals must be affirmed.

Patton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

168 F.2d 28 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 19, 1948

Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 556 , 61 S.Ct. 719 , 85 L.Ed. 1037 ; Helvering v. Tex-Penn Co., 300 U.S. 481, 498 , 57 S.Ct. 569 , 81 L.Ed. 755 ; Athens Roller Mills v. … The court may not substitute its view of the facts for. that of the Board. Where the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence they are conclusive."

Archie Lee O'Quinn v. Robert Brown, Jr. Dan Bolden John Jabe Jimmy Stegall S.L. Burt

989 F.2d 500 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 1993

Archie Lee O'QUINN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr.; Dan Bolden; John Jabe; Jimmy Stegall; S.L. Burt, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-2183. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 22, 1993. … Based upon a 1970 Disciplinary Board report, O'Quinn was determined to have a history of predatory homosexual behavior, and was given a "closed" confinement security classification.

Harold St. Clair v. Local Union No. 515 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

422 F.2d 128 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 30, 1969

This action was reversed by a Teamsters appeal board. … Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. at 197 , 87 S.Ct. at 903 ; see also Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 401 F.2d 87, 94-95 (3d Cir. 1968); Kress v.

Gary M. Tiboni v. The Cleveland Trinidad Paving Company

36 F.3d 533 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 30, 1994

Plaintiff relies upon United States v. … Municipal Energy Agency v. Big Rivers Electric Corp., 804 F.2d 338, 343 (5th Cir.1986).

National Labor Relations Board v. Grand River Super Meat Center, Inc.

51 F.3d 272 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 27, 1995

Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought. See NLRB v. … Board); NLRB v.

Adam R. Houser v. Mark H. Luttrell J.M. Brown Donald Clair

103 F.3d 129 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 12, 1996

Brown). … Woodson v. Lack, 865 F.2d 107, 109-10 (6th Cir.1989) (citing Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. at 564-67 )). 9 Houser, however, makes no showing of how Brown or Clair acted improperly in considering his incident reports.

Aldridge v. Gill

24 F. App'x 428 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 2001

We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand the case for reconsidera *429 tion in the light of Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 267 , 108 S.Ct. 2379 , 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988) and Brown v. … The “mailbox rule” of Houston v. Lack applies to the filing of § 1983 suits under the applicable, state statute of limitations. See, e.g., Cooper v. Brookshire, 70 F.3d 377, 378 (5th Cir.1995) (collecting cases).

Linda Rollins v. Wilson County Government Ron Gilbert, in His Official Capacity as Head of the Wilson County Finance Department

154 F.3d 626 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 9, 1998

Weaver v. … v.