Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

3.16s

  • Robert D. Alexander v. Merit Systems Protection Board

    165 F.3d 474 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1999

    “The Board’s determination may be reversed only when the reviewing court determines that the Board abused its discretion, or that the decision was not in accordance with the law.” Minnesota Dep’t of Jobs and Training v. … See Futernick v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Thompson Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    133 F.2d 637 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 1943

    In fact the Supreme Court has held that we may review only final orders of the Board. In re National Labor Relations Board, 304 U.S. 486 , 58 S.Ct. 1001 , 82 L.Ed. 1482 ; American Federation of Labor v. … National Labor Relations Board, 308 U.S. 401, 404 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 ; National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 308 U.S. 413 , 60 S.Ct. 306 , 84 L.Ed. 354 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Delight Bakery, Inc.

    353 F.2d 344 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 1965

    Co. v. Labor Board, supra, 321 U.S. at 704-705 , 64 S.Ct. at 818-819 . … B., supra; Brooks v. National Labor Relations Board, 348 U.S. 96 , 75 S.Ct. 176 , 99 L.Ed. 125 (1954); N. L. R. B. v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Gilmore Industries, Inc.

    341 F.2d 240 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 16, 1965

    In NLRB v. … NLRB v. Gor- *243 bea, Perez & Morell, S. en C., supra; Sewell Mfg. Co., supra. The Board in its brief relies on the following statement contained in the opinion of the Court in NLRB v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Trw, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    393 F.2d 771 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 24, 1968

    N.L.R.B. v. Shawnee Industries, Inc., 333 F.2d 221, 225 (10th Cir. 1964); National Labor Relations Board v. … No. 130, which were approved in National Labor Relations Board v. Avondale Mills, 242 F.2d 669, 671 (5th Cir. 1957), affirmed, National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Gerity Whitaker Co.

    137 F.2d 198 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 1942

    that, pursuant to N.L.R.B. v. … West Kentucky Coal Co., 6 Cir., 116 F.2d 816 , and N.L.R.B. v. United States Truck Co., 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 887 , paragraph 4(c) of the order shall be stricken therefrom.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ohio Afl-Cio v. The Insurance Rating Board

    451 F.2d 1178 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 30, 1971

    In F.T.C. v. National Cas. … Lanier, 242 F.Supp. 73 (E.D.N.C.1965), aff’d 361 F.2d 870 (4th Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 930 , 87 S.Ct. 290 , 17 L.Ed.2d 212 ; and Lynch v. Insurance Rating Board, D.C.M.D.Tenn. No. 5202 unreported.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Superior Co., Inc

    199 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 19, 1952

    B. v. Mylan-Sparta Co., 6 Cir., 166 F.2d 485, 491 ; N. L. R. B. v. Thompson Products, 6 Cir., 162 F.2d 287, 300 . … B. v. Ford, supra; Joy Silk Mills v. N. L. R. B., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 360 , 185 F.2d 732, 740 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Black-Clawson Co.

    210 F.2d 523 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 1954

    It is submitted by respondent that a profit-sharing plan is not within the area of bargaining contemplated by the Act; but in National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. … In accordance with the foregoing, an order will be entered denying enforcement of the order of the Board.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Hartmann Luggage Company

    453 F.2d 178 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 29, 1971

    Subsequently, two additional circuits have agreed that the Board’s position is correct. American Machinery Corp. v. NLRB, 424 F.2d 1321 (5th Cir. 1970); NLRB v. … Initially, the responsibility to draw the line between these conflicting rights rests with the Board, and its determination, unless illogical or arbitrary, ought not be disturbed. NLRB v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Monroe v. Board of Commissioners of Jackson

    453 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 1972

    .: Cato v. Parham, 403 F.2d *263 12, 16 (8th Cir. 1968), Rolfe v. County Board of Education, 391 F.2d 77 , 81 (6th Cir. 1968), Bradley v. School Board, 345 F.2d 310 , 321 (4th Cir. 1963), Bell v. … School Board of Powhatan, 321 F.2d 494 , 500 (4th Cir. 1963), Pettaway v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Power Equipment Company

    313 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 15, 1963

    This Court said in National Labor Relations Board v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Steven Ryan v. Aurora City Board of Education

    540 F.2d 222 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 2, 1976

    Accord: Hatton v. County Board of Education, 422 F.2d 457 (6th Cir. 1970); Rolfe v. County Board of Education, 391 F.2d 77 (6th Cir. 1968). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S., at 577 [ 92 S.Ct. 2701, at 2709 ].

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Sudekamp v. Fayette County Board of Education

    193 F. App'x 585 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 25, 2006

    Plaintiff Heather Suedkamp 1 appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Fayette County Board of Education on Suedkamp’s claim that the Board retaliated against her for exercising her right to a … served by a panel opinion and affirms the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in Judge Coffman’s September 1, 2005, opinion and order. 2 The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dennis M. Wolfel v. Herbert R. Bates, Gary Brown

    749 F.2d 7 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 27, 1984

    That court, relying on our decision in Buian v. … See Hensley v. Eckerhart, 103 S.Ct. at 1940 . Therefore, the Hensley Court’s direction to separate successful from unsuccessful claims is inapplicable.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. Electric Power Board of Chattanooga

    511 F.2d 1403 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 1975

    511 F.2d 1403 Ferguson v. Electric Power Board of Chattanooga 74-2060 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 2/12/75 E.D.Tenn., 378 F.Supp. 787 AFFIRMED

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Armco Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    344 F.2d 621 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 27, 1965

    NLRB v. Gale Products, Div. of Outboard Marine Corp., 337 F.2d 390 (C.A.7, 1964). Certiorari was not applied for. The Board’s order is thus left without support. … The Supreme Court has made it clear that national labor policy is for the Congress and not the Board to determine. American Ship Building Co. v. NLRB, 85 S.Ct. 955 (1965); NLRB v. Brown, 85 S.Ct. 980 (1965); NLRB v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Ted W. Brown, Secretary of State v. James I. Keller

    274 F.2d 779 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1960

    Brown in his capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio. Injunctive relief was sought against the defendants, which the District Court granted. Although this appeal is styled Ted W. Brown, Secretary of State, et al. v. … Brown, either individually or as Secretary of State, as an appellant.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • United States v. Tommy Lee Brown, Jr.

    48 F.3d 1220 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 8, 1995

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tommy Lee BROWN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-3494. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 8, 1995. … United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Homemaker Shops, Inc.

    724 F.2d 535 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 1984

    Brown and Mrs. … Brown’s union activities. The Board’s order is now before this Court for review. III. We turn first to the Board’s finding that the Company has acted in such a way as to dominate the operation of the Committee.

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.