Case law

United States v. Locklear

631 F.3d 364 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 28, 2011

Here, the superseding indictment provides: No. 08-1180 United States v. … No. 08-1180 United States v.

United States v. Hyman Sternman

433 F.2d 913 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 16, 1970

United States v. Sternman, 415 F.2d 1165 (6th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907 , 90 S.Ct. 903 , 25 L.Ed.2d 88 (1970). … Green v. United States, 356 U.S. 165 , 78 S.Ct. 632 , 2 L.Ed.2d 672 (1958); Brown v. United States, 359 U.S. 41 , 79 S.Ct. 539 , 3 L.Ed.2d 609 (1959).

Gilmore v. Corrections Corp.

92 F. App'x 188 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 2004

McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir.1997). … Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 , 92 S.Ct. 594 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972). However, even pro se complaints must satisfy basic pleading requirements. See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989).

Kellogg v. Shoemaker

46 F.3d 503 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 9, 1995

Plaintiffs also argue that this court should reconsider Sneed v. Donahue, which held that a parole board was not required to provide the parolee with a hearing if the board exercised no discretion in revoking parole. … There is no need for this court to issue an injunction when the *507 parole board has voluntarily changed its allegedly unconstitutional practices. See Cotton v.

Wilmington Trust Co. v. AEP Generating Co.

859 F.3d 365 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 8, 2017

Kutell, FROST BROWN TODD LLC, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. David L. Elsberg, Sanford I. Weisburst, Peter E. Calamari, Rollo Baker, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, New York, New York, for Appellees. … And it exercised this power by initiating and 2 “Governmental Authority” means “any Federal, state, county, municipal, foreign, international, regional or other governmental authority, agency, board, body

Beehler v. United States

40 F.2d 313 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1930

Veterans’ Bureau, 1923), promulgated by the director, establishes a claim and rating board under each regional office as the Bureau’s only means of determining the physical status of those claiming rights under *315 World … Gratiot v. United States, 4 How. 80 , 11 L. Ed. 884 ; United States v. Eliason, 16 Pet. 291 , 10 L. Ed. 968 ; Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co., 190 U. S. 301 , 23 S. Ct. 692 , 47 L. Ed. 1064 .

Gilewski v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.

683 F. App'x 399 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 2017

Gerald Shiener, a board certified psychiatrist. Dr. … Peter Brown, an -8- Case No. 16-2028, Gilewski v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co.

Jonathan Cruz-Guzman v. William P. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 5, 2019

But there was still substantial evidence for the Board to  No. 18-3520 Cruz-Guzman v. … See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992); Harmon v. Holder, 758 F.3d 728, 735–36 (6th Cir. 2014). The Board can find a persecutor’s motive by “connect[ing] the dots of circumstantial evidence.”

National Labor Relations Board v. Dayton Electroplate, Inc.

16 F.3d 1220 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 3, 1994

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DAYTON ELECTROPLATE, INC., Respondent. No. 92-6723. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 3, 1994. … NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951); YHA, Inc. v. NLRB, 2 F.3d 168, 172 (6th Cir.1993). The Board's application of law to facts is also reviewed under the substantial evidence standard. East Tenn. Baptist Hosp. v.

Richard F. Davet v. City of Cleveland, Robert Vilkas and City of Cleveland Department of Building & Housing

452 F.3d 507 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 22, 2006

Ohio Sign Contractors Ass’n v. … VI, cl. 2; see Marshall v.

Golf Village N., LLC v. City of Powell, Ohio

14 F.4th 611 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 23, 2021

Grayem, FROST BROWN TODD LLC, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. No. 20-4117 Golf Village N., LLC, et al. v. City of Powell, Ohio, et al. Page 2 OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. … In all the cases from sundry federal courts cited by Golf Village in support of its right to use and enjoy takings claim, United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946), Brown v. United States, 73 F.3d 1100 (Fed.

Rudolph Jones, Jr. Susan Jones Tandy Jones Gilliland v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation

175 F.3d 410 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 20, 1999

See Friends of the Earth v. … See Friends of Earth v.

First Family Mortgage Corp. v. Earnest

851 F.2d 843 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1988

Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979), and therefore they do not create an enforceable, mandatory “foreclosure avoidance duty” or “refunding duty” on the part of the VA. … Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356, 361 (5th Cir.1977).

Erdman v. Michigan Department of Corrections

52 F. App'x 721 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 9, 2002

See Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir.2000). The district court properly dismissed Erdmaris complaint for failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies. … See Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998). The prisoner has the burden of demonstrating that he has exhausted these remedies. Id. at 1104 .

Wolcott v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

884 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 1989

Gutierrez v. … Circuit in Holt v.

Cathron v. Jones

77 F. App'x 835 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 2, 2003

Both testified that Petitioner was wearing a brown coat, and Powell testified that she later picked up the brown coat at the jail. … People v.

No. 90-1091

970 F.2d 154 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1992

Brown, Brown & Brown, St. Ignace, Mich., for Clifford Bigelow, et al. Charles M. Brown, Brown & Brown, St. Ignace, Mich., for Leonard Dutcher Fishery, Inc., et al. Thomas J. Emery, Kevin T. Smith, Asst. Attys. Gen. … Co. v.

Wolfe v. Thomas

268 F. 464 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 12, 1920

Express Co. v. Wahl, 168 Fed. 848 , 94 C. C. A. 260 ; Ry. Co. v. Christison, 39 Ill. App. 495 ; Railway Co. v. Smith, 25 S. W. 1032 ; Enders v. Skannal, 35 La. … He is also entitled to recover in a court of admiralty jurisdiction whatever damages he actually sustained from the injuries inflicted upon him on board the vessel. Spencer v.

Arnetia Robinson v. Fed. Housing Fin. Agency

876 F.3d 220 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 22, 2017

Perry Capital, 864 F.3d at 638 n.1 (Brown, J., dissenting).  No. 16-6680 Robinson v. Fed. Housing Fin. Agency, et al. … See id. at 642–43 (Brown, J., dissenting).

National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Keith E. Watts

963 F.2d 148 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 1992

Lowd v. Cal Kovens Construction Corp., 546 So.2d 1087 (Fla.1989); Doyle v. Faford, 517 So.2d 778 (Fla.1988); Brown v. Progressive Mut. Ins. Co., 249 So.2d 429, 430 (Fla.1979). … Brown v. Progressive Mut. Ins. Co., 249 So.2d at 430 . Indiana and Texas law, however, both require the hit-and-run vehicle to physically touch the insured in order to qualify for uninsured motorist coverage. Guzman v.