Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. General Shoe Corp.

192 F.2d 504 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 26, 1951

See National Labor Relations Board v. Precision Castings Co., 6 Cir., 130 F.2d 639 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Jas. H. … Board, 74 App.D.C. 52 , 120 F.2d 641, 644, 645 ; American Smelting & Refining Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 126 F.2d 680, 683 ; W. W. Cross & Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Cleveland Trust Co.

214 F.2d 95 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 27, 1954

The Board adopted this finding. But the burden of proof rests not upon the bank to convince the Board that the raise was not in violation of the Act but upon the Board to prove that the raise was illegal. N. L. R. B. v. … V. N. L. R.

National Labor Relations Board v. Precision Castings Co.

130 F.2d 639 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 28, 1942

It is conceivable -that a contrary inference might be drawn but the Board was not required to draw it. National Labor Rel. Board v. … Co. v. Nat. Labor Rel. Board, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 657, 661 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Brenda K. Monroe v. Board of Commissioners, City of Jackson, Tennessee, and County Board of Education, Madison County, Tennessee

380 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 21, 1967

Appellants argue that the courts must now, by reconsidering the implications of the Brown v. … Brown v. Board of Education, supra, did not speak on it, nor did the early relevant decisions from this circuit. In Mapp v.

Nagarajan v. Jones

33 F. App'x 791 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 25, 2002

. *792 Nagarajan sued his employer, the General Board of Discipleship for the United Methodist Church (the Board), and five Board members in both their individual and official capacities. … See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3); Harre v. A.H. Robins Co., 750 F.2d 1501, 1503 (11th Cir.1985); Simons v. Gorsuch, 715 F.2d 1248, 1253 (7th Cir.1983).

Shirlene Hall v. Knott County Board of Education

941 F.2d 402 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 6, 1991

See Miener v. … See Honig v.

Atlas Underwear Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

116 F.2d 1020 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 15, 1941

Consumers Power Co. v. N. L. R. B., 6 Cir., 113 F.2d 38 . … B. v. Asheville Hosiery Co., 4 Cir., 108 F.2d 288 .

K.D.I., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

829 F.2d 5 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 15, 1987

The Board has filed a cross-application asking us for enforcement of its order. K.D.I. contends that the election was invalidated by union activity that violated the rule established in NLRB v. … See, e.g., Gulf Coast Automotive Warehouse Co., Inc., v. NLRB, 588 F.2d 1096, 1099 (5th Cir.1979); Regency Electronics, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Renmuth, Inc.

470 F.2d 997 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 1972

The Board’s decisions are reported at 195 NLRB No. 54 and 195 NLRB No. 59 . The Intervenor has filed a brief urging enforcement. … The Court holds that the findings of fact of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. It is ordered that the orders of the Board be and they are hereby enforced.

Janzen v. Knox County Board of Education

790 F.2d 484 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 8, 1986

JANZEN and wife, Nancy Janzen, and Charles David Janzen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KNOX COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; Knox County, Tennessee; State Board of Education; and State of Tennessee, Defendants-Appellees. … See Wilson v. Garcia, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 1942 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985); Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1794-95 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980).

National Labor Relations Board v. Scenic Sportswear

475 F.2d 1226 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 1973

This court has on previous occasions said that Board complaints need not meet the strict particularity in pleading required of indictments, declarations at law, or bills in equity. Consumers Power Co. v. … Their principal function is to provide notice, NLRB v.

Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

523 F.2d 814 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 15, 1975

Petitioner next argues that the Board erred in finding that Personnel Manager Preston unlawfully interrogated employee Brown. … Although the Board is free to find facts and to draw inferences therefrom different from those of the administrative law judge, NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lannom Manufacturing Company

226 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 6, 1955

See also: Aerovox Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 93 U.S.App.D.C. 350 , 211 F.2d 640 . As indicated by the foregoing recital of the actions of the Board, the Board does not agree with this construction of the Act. … In Hupman v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pentre Electric, Inc.

998 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 8, 1993

Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). We review the Board’s conclusions of law de novo. Wilson v. … Furthermore, in our opinion, the Board has erroneously interpreted section 8(c) and NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Dow Chemical Co.

117 F.2d 455 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 1941

While we have not, the National Labor Relations Board has been entrusted with the power to draw infemnces from facts. National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261 , 58 S.Ct. 571 , 82 L.Ed. 831 , 115 A.L.R. 307 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Robert D. Alexander v. Merit Systems Protection Board

165 F.3d 474 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1999

“The Board’s determination may be reversed only when the reviewing court determines that the Board abused its discretion, or that the decision was not in accordance with the law.” Minnesota Dep’t of Jobs and Training v. … See Futernick v.

Thompson Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

133 F.2d 637 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 1943

In fact the Supreme Court has held that we may review only final orders of the Board. In re National Labor Relations Board, 304 U.S. 486 , 58 S.Ct. 1001 , 82 L.Ed. 1482 ; American Federation of Labor v. … National Labor Relations Board, 308 U.S. 401, 404 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 ; National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 308 U.S. 413 , 60 S.Ct. 306 , 84 L.Ed. 354 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Sparks-Withington Co.

119 F.2d 78 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 16, 1941

On April 12, 1937, the Jones and Laughlin case, National Labor Relations Board v. … We recognize of course that the. findings of the-Board as to facts if supported by the evidence are conclusive, but, as we, stated in N. L. R. B. v.

Wilkie Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

55 F. App'x 324 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 29, 2003

Id.; See also NLRB v. Autodie Int’l, Inc., 169 F.3d 378, 381 (6th Cir. 1999). We therefore grant summary enforcement of the following uncontested *327 findings of the Board. … In reviewing the findings, we must also determine whether the Board considered contradictory evidence and evidence that suggests conflicting inferences. See Heritage Broad. Co. of Michigan v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky Utilities Co.

182 F.2d 810 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1950

In N.L.R.B. v. … Pueblo Gas & Fuel Co. v. N.L.R.B., 10 Cir., 118 F.2d 305 . Respondent’s brief does not discuss the other provisions of the Board’s Order, and, accordingly, we consider them as not at issue in this Court. Kahn v.