Case law

Ken Lick Coal Co. v. OWCP

129 F.4th 370 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 21, 2025

The party may appeal the judge’s decision to the Benefits Review Board. See 20 C.F.R. § 725.481. And the party may then seek judicial review of the Board’s decision in a circuit court. … The Benefits Review Board vacated this decision due to a change in law.

Thomas A. Fox v. Saginaw County, Mich.

35 F.4th 1042 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 2022

ARI got ten claimants on board within a few months. It then hired a law firm to represent the claimants. Soon after, the district court certified Fox’s class. … Erhardt v.

United States v. Richard Charles Bartholomew, Warren Gene Harris and Juleen Nicole Henry

310 F.3d 912 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 15, 2002

United States v. … United States v.

Susana Morales Bribiesca v. William P. Barr

979 F.3d 508 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 30, 2020

The Board of Immigration Appeals agreed and entered a final order of removal. … When as here the Board adopts and adds to the immigration judge’s decision, we review both the immigration judge’s decision and the Board’s own opinion. See Hachem v. Holder, 656 F.3d 430, 434 (6th Cir. 2011).

Tanazi v. Ashcroft

106 F. App'x 380 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 5, 2004

As the Seventh Circuit *386 stated in Guentchev v. INS, 77 F.3d 1036, 1038 (7th Cir.1996), Perhaps some summary dispositions obscure the Board’s reasons, or hide the lack of reasons. … See Mendoza v.

Louisville Trust Co. v. National Bank of Kentucky

102 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 13, 1939

Williams v. Order of Commercial Travelers, 6 Cir., 41 F.2d 745 ; Carpenter v. … Murray v. Pate, 6 Dana 335 ; Gorman v. Gorman, 210 Ky. 65 , 275 S.W. 366 ; Duteil v. Mullens, 192 Ky. 616 , 234 S.W. 192 , 20 A.L.R. 361 .

Harry Truman Ailor and Betty Darlene Lynch v. City of Maynardville, Tennessee

368 F.3d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 17, 2004

Comfort Lake Ass’n. v. … Ugalde, The Future of Environmental Citizen Suits After Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources, 8 Envtl.Law. 589, 614 (2002).

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

901 F.2d 497 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 13, 1990

Brown, Gloria Gaylord, Alan R. Schriber, and Len-worth Smith, Jr. (collectively, the PUCO). The Railroads operate in and through the state of Ohio, and thus would be subject to the proposed regulations. … It also created an independent safety board to oversee the functions and performance of each of the modal administrations within the Department of Transportation. 49 U.S. C.App. §§ 1901-1902.

Herold v. Herold China & Pottery Co.

257 F. 911 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 7, 1919

The following are among the leading cases supporting this rule: Morrison v. Moat, 9 Hare, 241; Peabody v. Norfolk, 98 Mass. 452 , 96 Am. Dec. 664 ; O. & W. Thum Co. v. Tloczynski, 114 Mich. 149 , 72 N. W. 140 , 38 L. R. … Taylor Co. v. Nichols, supra; Baglin v. Cusenier (C. C. A. 2), 164 Fed. 25, 29 , 90 C. C. A. 499 . And see Sterling Varnish Co. v. Macon, 217 Pa. 7, 9 , 66 Atl. 78 .

Michigan Department Of Environmental Quality v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

318 F.3d 705 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 2003

See Spitzer Great Lakes Ltd. v. … Board.

Williams v. Mehra

186 F.3d 685 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 4, 1999

Whitney v. Brown, 882 F.2d 1068, 1071 (6th Cir.1989); Taylor and Gaskin, Inc. v. Chris-Craft Indus., 732 F.2d 1273, 1277 (6th Cir.1984). A. … Whitney v. Brown, 882 F.2d at 1071 . Disputes over such issues do not divest us of jurisdiction to hear the appeal. B. Defendant-Appellant Mehra The panel held that Dr.

Russell Wulf and Ronald Rentschler v. Quantum Chemical Corporation Quantum Employee Stock Ownership Plan for Hourly Represented Employees

26 F.3d 1368 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 27, 1994

Brown v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp., 876 F.2d 546, 650 (6th Cir.1989). … The district court also cited our decision in Board of Education of Muhlenberg County v. United States, 920 F.2d 370, 375-76 (6th Cir.1990).

France Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

88 F.2d 917 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 9, 1937

Taplin v. Com’r, 41 F.(2d) 454 (C.C.A.6), and Com’r v. VanVorst, 59 F.(2d) 677 (C.C.A.9), are cited in support. … The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Richard D. ROWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEVELAND PNEUMATIC COMPANY, NUMERICAL CONTROL, INC., Defendant-Appellee

690 F.2d 88 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 8, 1982

Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co., 457 F.2d 1377 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 982 , 93 S.Ct. 319 , 34 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972). V. … Noting that many Title VII cases involving subjective evaluation procedures have been analyzed under the disparate impact doctrine, e.g., Rowe v. General Motors Corp., supra; Brown v.

Ironton Publications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

73 F.3d 362 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 21, 1995

Gatliff Coal Co. v. NLRB, 953 F.2d 247, 250-51 (6th Cir.1992) (citing NLRB v. Brown-Graves Lumber, 949 F.2d 194, 196 (6th Cir.1991)). … NLRB v.

General Film Co. v. Sampliner

232 F. 95 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 4, 1916

Oscanvan v. Arms Co., 103 U. S. 261, 266 , 26 L. Ed. 539 ; Lee v. Johnson, 116 U. S. 48, 52 , 6 Sup. Ct. 249, 29 L. Ed. 570 ; Peck v. Heurich, 167 U. S. 624, 627, 629 , 17 Sup. Ct. 927, 42 L. Ed. 302 et seq; Brown v. … In Brown v. Ginn, supra, the plea was only that the plaintiff was not the real party in interest ( 66 Ohio St. 317 , 64 N.

American Snuff Company and Martin J. Condon, Individually and as President of the American Snuff Company v. National Labor Relations Board

196 F.2d 1019 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 27, 1952

Consumers Power Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 113 F.2d 38 ; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 122 F.2d 450 , 136 A.L.R. 883 ; Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v.

Benjamin Carethers v. Hugh Wolfenbarger

407 F. App'x 14 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 2011

A parole board determines the defendant’s actual time served within the minimum and maximum Carethers v. Wolfenbarger, No. 09-1310 sentences. See MICH . COMP. LAWS §§ 777.1-777.69; People v. … Carethers attempts to rebut this presumption by arguing that his case is very similar to Brown v. McKee, 340 F. App’x 254 (6th Cir. 2009). Brown is not as on point as Carethers suggests.

Vitro Corporation of America v. Hall Chemical Company, and James D. Hall

292 F.2d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 1961

The minutes of the board meeting show that White reported to the Board on the status of the negotiations with Hall for the acquisition of his patent pertaining to the recovery of cobalt, nickel, columbium, molybdenum, etc … The late Judge Denison in Egry Register Company v.

University Of Cincinnati v. Heckler

733 F.2d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 14, 1984

See, e.g., Loma Linda University v. Schweiker, 705 F.2d 1123, 1126 (9th Cir.1983); Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Inc. v. Schweiker, 698 F.2d 336, 340 (8th Cir.1983); Chesire Hospital v. N.H.-V.T. … In Northwest Hospital, Inc. v.