Case law

Susana Morales Bribiesca v. William P. Barr

979 F.3d 508 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 30, 2020

The Board of Immigration Appeals agreed and entered a final order of removal. … When as here the Board adopts and adds to the immigration judge’s decision, we review both the immigration judge’s decision and the Board’s own opinion. See Hachem v. Holder, 656 F.3d 430, 434 (6th Cir. 2011).

Richard D. ROWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEVELAND PNEUMATIC COMPANY, NUMERICAL CONTROL, INC., Defendant-Appellee

690 F.2d 88 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 8, 1982

Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co., 457 F.2d 1377 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 982 , 93 S.Ct. 319 , 34 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972). V. … Noting that many Title VII cases involving subjective evaluation procedures have been analyzed under the disparate impact doctrine, e.g., Rowe v. General Motors Corp., supra; Brown v.

Joni Aggoubi Zaitona v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

9 F.3d 432 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1993

Zaitona contends that the Board erred in concluding he was deportable for having committed two crimes of moral turpitude. … The substantial evidence standard requires only that the Board’s conclusion be based upon the evidence presented and that it be substantially reasonable. Animashaun v.

Thomas A. Fox v. Saginaw County, Mich.

35 F.4th 1042 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 2022

ARI got ten claimants on board within a few months. It then hired a law firm to represent the claimants. Soon after, the district court certified Fox’s class. … Erhardt v.

United States v. Richard Charles Bartholomew, Warren Gene Harris and Juleen Nicole Henry

310 F.3d 912 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 15, 2002

United States v. … United States v.

Tanazi v. Ashcroft

106 F. App'x 380 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 5, 2004

As the Seventh Circuit *386 stated in Guentchev v. INS, 77 F.3d 1036, 1038 (7th Cir.1996), Perhaps some summary dispositions obscure the Board’s reasons, or hide the lack of reasons. … See Mendoza v.

France Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

88 F.2d 917 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 9, 1937

Taplin v. Com’r, 41 F.(2d) 454 (C.C.A.6), and Com’r v. VanVorst, 59 F.(2d) 677 (C.C.A.9), are cited in support. … The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Agristor Leasing v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.

869 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 9, 1989

Smith Corp., and Robert Brown, d/b/a East Tennessee Silo Builders. AOSHPI manufactures the Harve-store silos; the A.O. Smith Corp. is AOSH-PI’s parent corporation; and Brown erected the silos on the Taylor farm. … See Smith v.

Ironton Publications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

73 F.3d 362 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 21, 1995

Gatliff Coal Co. v. NLRB, 953 F.2d 247, 250-51 (6th Cir.1992) (citing NLRB v. Brown-Graves Lumber, 949 F.2d 194, 196 (6th Cir.1991)). … NLRB v.

Braun v. Ann Arbor Charter

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 13, 2008

No. 07-1370 Braun, et al. v. Ann Arbor Charter Township Page 3 recommendation to the Township Board. … R.S.W.W., Inc. v. City of Keego Harbor, 397 F.3d 427, 435 (6th Cir. 2005) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)).

United States v. French Moore (94-5610), Alvin Bonner (94-5756)

54 F.3d 777 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 17, 1995

Brown, 915 F.2d 219, 224 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Lyman, 892 F.2d 751, 753 (8th Cir. 1989)), this is not a case of "mere" possession. … Bonner's reliance on Brown is misplaced.

Robert Winter, Jr. v. Steven Wolnitzek

834 F.3d 681 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 2016

Brown v. Hartlage, 456 U.S. 45, 60–61 (1982); see Weaver, 309 F.3d at 1319–20. (7) Misleading statements clause. Canon 5(B)(1)(c)’s ban on misleading statements fails across the board. … Brown, 456 U.S. at 60–61 (quotation omitted).

United States v. Johnson

627 F.3d 578 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 16, 2010

United States v. … United States v. Brown, 367 F.3d 549, 556 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Webb, 335 F.3d 534, 537-38 (6th Cir. 2003)).

Apx International, Formerly Aero Detroit, Inc., (96-6271 97-5954) v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner (96-6520 97-5993), International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), Intervenor. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), (96-6420), Apx International, Formerly Aero Detroit, Inc., Intervenor v. National Labor Relations Board

144 F.3d 995 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 29, 1998

NLRB v. Kentucky May Coal Co., Inc., 89 F.3d 1235, 1243 (6th Cir.1996) (quoting NLRB v. … The Board has not established "that a bargaining order is the 'only satisfactory remedy.' " Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 1292, 1301 (6th Cir.1988) (quoting NLRB v.

Williams v. Mehra

186 F.3d 685 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 4, 1999

Whitney v. Brown, 882 F.2d 1068, 1071 (6th Cir.1989); Taylor and Gaskin, Inc. v. Chris-Craft Indus., 732 F.2d 1273, 1277 (6th Cir.1984). A. … Whitney v. Brown, 882 F.2d at 1071 . Disputes over such issues do not divest us of jurisdiction to hear the appeal. B. Defendant-Appellant Mehra The panel held that Dr.

Flynt v. Leis

574 F.2d 874 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 12, 1978

In Konigsberg v. State Bar 7 and Schware v. … Board of Higher Educ., 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956). . See NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 , 83 S.Ct. 328 , 9 L.Ed.2d 405 (1963); Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel.

American Snuff Company and Martin J. Condon, Individually and as President of the American Snuff Company v. National Labor Relations Board

196 F.2d 1019 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 27, 1952

Consumers Power Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 113 F.2d 38 ; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 122 F.2d 450 , 136 A.L.R. 883 ; Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v.

Benjamin Carethers v. Hugh Wolfenbarger

407 F. App'x 14 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 2011

A parole board determines the defendant’s actual time served within the minimum and maximum Carethers v. Wolfenbarger, No. 09-1310 sentences. See MICH . COMP. LAWS §§ 777.1-777.69; People v. … Carethers attempts to rebut this presumption by arguing that his case is very similar to Brown v. McKee, 340 F. App’x 254 (6th Cir. 2009). Brown is not as on point as Carethers suggests.

Vitro Corporation of America v. Hall Chemical Company, and James D. Hall

292 F.2d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 1961

The minutes of the board meeting show that White reported to the Board on the status of the negotiations with Hall for the acquisition of his patent pertaining to the recovery of cobalt, nickel, columbium, molybdenum, etc … The late Judge Denison in Egry Register Company v.

Clarence P. Sherman v. Air Reduction Sales Company, Division of Air Reduction Company Incorporated

251 F.2d 543 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1958

Larwill v. Burke, 1900, 19 Ohio Cir. … Representative of these decisions are Cohen v. Bucey, 1952, 158 Ohio St. 159 , 107 N.E.2d 333 ; Brown v. Cleveland Baseball Co., 1952, 158 Ohio St. 1 , 106 N.E.2d 632 ; and Louisville & N. R. Co. v.