Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

0.92s

  • Agristor Leasing v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.

    869 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 9, 1989

    Smith Corp., and Robert Brown, d/b/a East Tennessee Silo Builders. AOSHPI manufactures the Harve-store silos; the A.O. Smith Corp. is AOSH-PI’s parent corporation; and Brown erected the silos on the Taylor farm. … See Smith v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Butchers' Supply Co. v. Walker Bin Co.

    230 F. 453 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1916

    Walker Co. v. Brown (C. C. Pa.) 110 Fed. 649 ; Walker Co. v. Miller (C. C. Pa.) 132 Fed. 823 ; Miller v. Walker Co. (C. C. A. 3) 139 Fed. 134 , 71 C. C. A. 398 ; Walker Co. v. Gloekler (D. C. … Pa.), affirmed in 225 Fed. 46 ; Gloekler v. Walker Co. (C. C. A. 3) 225 Fed. 46 , 140 C. C. A. 372 ; Walker Co. v. Liebe (D. C. La.) 224 Fed. 516 , affirmed in 225 Fed. 45 , 140 C. C. A. 371 ; Liebe v. Walker Co. (C. C.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Internation Hod Carriers' Building And Common Laborers' Union Of America, Afl-Cio, Local Union No. 1445

    289 F.2d 492 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1961

    289 F.2d 492 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATION HOD CARRIERS' BUILDING AND COMMON LABORERS' UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 1445, and Its Agent John Haney, Respondents. No. 14378. … National Labor Relations Board, 80 S.Ct. 875 ; National Labor Relations Board v. News Syndicate Company, 80 S.Ct. 849 ; International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, 81 S.Ct. 855

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

    803 F.2d 258 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 14, 1986

    In Thermal Ecology Must Be Preserved v. … See Ecology Action v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Ford Motor Co.

    866 F.2d 895 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 1989

    Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 190 , 87 S.Ct. 903, 916 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967). … Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 424 U.S. 554, 568 , 96 S.Ct. 1048, 1058 , 47 L.Ed.2d 231 (1976).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Ruo Enterline

    23 F. App'x 446 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 7, 2001

    Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir.1999); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998). The prisoner has the burden of demonstrating that he has exhausted these remedies. Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 . … Wyatt, 193 F.3d at 878 ; Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Berry v. School District Of Benton Harbor

    505 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 1, 1974

    Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 18 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Green v. … Wright v. Council of City of Emporia, 407 U.S. 451, 461-462 , 92 S.Ct. 2196 , 33 L.Ed.2d 51 (1971); see United States v. Texas Education Agency,supra; Mahaley v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Arthur Taylor v. General Motors Corporation, and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

    763 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 1985

    In Roe v. … ‘“[A] defendant may not remove a case to federal court unless the plaintiff’s complaint establishes that the case “arises under” federal law.’ ” 719 F.2d at 764 (quoting Franchise Tax Board of California v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Mullins

    621 F.2d 253 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 27, 1980

    The plaintiff appeals from judgment of the district court dismissing his declaratory judgment action in which he sought a declaration from the district court that he is eligible and entitled to receive benefits from the Board … Davis, 507 F.2d 308 (6th Cir. 1974), where the decision in Wilder v. United Mine Workers Welfare and Retirement Fund, 346 S.W.2d 27 (Ky.1961), was held to be controlling on this issue.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Joseph F. Hogan v. Wilbur C. Wright, D.B.A. Wright Construction Company

    322 F.2d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 13, 1963

    The representation involving the same subject matter was extended to the presentation and prosecution of a claim before the Sundry Claims Board of the State of Ohio. … Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 . The case was tried to the court and the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $27,468.36. This was 20% of the amount recovered.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Parlak v. Holder

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 2009

    The Court ruled that the Board incorrectly assumed that Federenko v. … V. The IJ, the Board, and now the majority have committed significant legal errors in adjudicating Parlak’s removal proceedings.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mason v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    125 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 14, 1942

    This is a petition to review the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals involving a deficiency in income tax in the amount of $10,827.57 for the year 1935. The Board sustained the Commissioner. 41 B.T.A. 1287 . … We think the Board correctly sustained the determination of the Commissioner.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lester Morton v. Local 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, And Helpers Union

    320 F.2d 505 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 1963

    It also said: "Nor is it significant that California asserted its power to give damages rather than to enjoin what the Board may restrain though it could not compensate." San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v. … . § 187 and this is completely independent of any National Labor Relations Board proceeding. 2 International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Operation Kings v. Connerly

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 28, 2007

    Co. v. … See, e.g., Hall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scorteanu v. INS

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 2003

    This appeal arises from a - - No. 01-4271 decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or v. … See Dobrota v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clyde Owens Kenner v. T. C. Martin, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution at Ashland, Kentucky

    648 F.2d 1080 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 12, 1981

    On June 15,1978, the Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Kentucky issued a parole violator’s warrant for Kenner, based on his conviction of the federal offenses. Kenner was informed about the warrant in July of 1979. … Caruso v. United States Board of Parole, 570 F.2d 1150 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 2249 , 56 L.Ed.2d 411 (1978); Maggio v. United States Parole Commission, 466 F.Supp. 322 (E.D.N.Y.1979).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Newcor Bay City Division of Newcor, Inc.

    219 F. App'x 390 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 15, 2007

    The Board affirmed the ALJ’s rulings, findings, and conclusions, and No. 06-1285 NLRB v. Newcor adopted the ALJ’s recommended order. … The Board’s conclusion regarding impasse is entitled to deference. NLRB v.

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • Warren Bros. v. Nelson

    635 F.2d 552 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 5, 1980

    See Decision of the Benefits Review Board in Nelson v. Warren Brothers, BRB No. 76-414 & 76-414A (Jan. 24, 1978). Legal doctrine supports this factual determination. … The decision of the Benefits Review Board is affirmed. .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Nsue-Bisa v. Ashcroft

    98 F. App'x 436 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 14, 2004

    Nsue-Bisa appealed the decision of the immigration court to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or the “Board”), which affirmed the denial of relief. … Yu v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 700, 702-03 (6th Cir.2004).

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.