Case law

Gray v. Slc Coal Company

176 F.3d 382 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 24, 1999

See Shuff v. … See, e.g., Adams v. Peabody Coal Co., 816 F.2d 1116, 1120-21 (6th Cir.1987). As the Benefits Review Board noted, Dr. Hunsaker acknowledged that he used criteria developed by Dr. Kleinerman in making his diagnosis.

National Labor Relations Board v. Internation Hod Carriers' Building And Common Laborers' Union Of America, Afl-Cio, Local Union No. 1445

289 F.2d 492 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1961

289 F.2d 492 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATION HOD CARRIERS' BUILDING AND COMMON LABORERS' UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 1445, and Its Agent John Haney, Respondents. No. 14378. … National Labor Relations Board, 80 S.Ct. 875 ; National Labor Relations Board v. News Syndicate Company, 80 S.Ct. 849 ; International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, 81 S.Ct. 855

Mohammed v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 2, 2007

The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the immigration judge’s decision without opinion. 1 No. 06-3591 Mohammed v. … See Pilica v.

Merchants' Ins. Co. v. Buckner

110 F. 345 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 2, 1901

Railroad Co. v. Hellenthal, 31 C. C. A. 414 , 88 Fed. 116 ; Burton v. Driggs, 20 Wall. 125 , 22 L. Ed. 299 ; Toplitz v. Hedden, 146 U. S. 252 , 13 Sup. Ct. 70, 36 L. Ed. 961 . 3. … Ky. §§ 113, 114; Dean v. English, 18 B. Mon. 132 ; Yeates v. Walker, 1 Duv. 84 ; Caldwell v. Caldwell, 2 Bush, 446 ; Sale v. Crutchfield, 8 Bush, 636 -646.

United States v. Washington

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 23, 2004

United States v. … Nor did the affidavit claim that Brown resided at trafficker actually owns or resides at the property to be 3112 Crossgate. At the time he produced the affidavit, searched. Cf. United States v.

Audio Technica U.S., Inc. v. United States

963 F.3d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 26, 2020

Browning, 283 F.3d at 775 (quoting Teledyne Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 911 F.2d 1214, 1218 (6th Cir. 1990)); see also New Hampshire v. … Browning, 283 F.3d at 776.

United Transportation Union, Local 74 v. Consolidated Rail Corp., United Transportation Union

881 F.2d 282 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 16, 1989

This decision was appealed to the Union Board of Appeals by representatives of several former PC groups; in denying the appeal the Board stated that there is no such thing as an “identifiable” train, so equity must be determined … See Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, 607 F.2d 705, 707 (6th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982) (citing Dairy Queen v.

Stanley Afek, Paul Bartolotta, and Donald Brown v. Firestone Steel Products, an Ohio Corporation

831 F.2d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 20, 1987

Stanley AFEK, Paul Bartolotta, and Donald Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FIRESTONE STEEL PRODUCTS, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-2015. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Oct. 20, 1987.

Arnold v. Arnold Corp.-Printed Communications for Business

920 F.2d 1269 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 1990

Co. v. … Mabbs was a member of the Board of Directors and Chairman of its Executive Committee. Lindgren was a member of the Board of Directors. .

United States v. Ryan Sumlin

956 F.3d 879 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 21, 2020

In particular, he compares the instant affidavit with the one at issue in United States v. Brown, 828 F.3d 375 (6th Cir. 2016), which this court ultimately determined lacked a sufficient nexus. … Furthermore, we agree with the district court that Sumlin’s reliance on United States v. Brown, 828 F.3d 375, 383–84 (6th Cir. 2016) is misplaced.

Omnipoint Holdings v. Southfield

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 15, 2004

v. … When the board not in the resolution itself.

Local Union 760, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Presley

296 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 5, 1961

Defending Educ. v. Olentangy Loc. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 2025

Workers Union Loc. 751 v. Brown Grp., Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 554–55 (1996). These concessions leave only associational standing’s first requirement. … See Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968).

Dimitrios Papas v. Buchwald Capital Advisors, LLC

728 F.3d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 26, 2013

.”); Gerber v. MTC Elec. Techs. … See Denney v.

Doe v. United States

932 F.2d 481 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 26, 1991

Doe v. Rosenberry, 255 F.2d at 120 . Although commentators have criticized the Doe v. … That prosecution may culminate in a disciplinary hearing before a three attorney panel appointed by the Board. M.C.R. 9.111. The actions of that panel are reviewable by the full Board. M.C.R. 9.110(D)(5).

Maxwell's Pic-Pac, Inc v. Tony Dehner

739 F.3d 936 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 15, 2014

Section 243.230(7) does just that, granting limited discretion to the administrative board. … At bottom, the statutory language limits the board’s authority to define the terms of the statute. This fact distinguishes this case from the one relied upon by the grocers, Diemer v.

Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and Cardinal Federal Savings Bank v. Robert W. Quinn and Daniel J. Gannon

922 F.2d 1251 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 1991

Corp. v. Quinn, 711 F.Supp. 366, 379 (N.D.Ohio 1989). We disagree with the District Court’s conclusion that the preliminary injunction should issue. … Shortly after beginning work on November 24, 1987, Quinn and Gannon, along with Cardinal’s other officers, entered a consent agreement on December 17, 1987, under which the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“Bank Board”), as

Pope v. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund

27 F.3d 211 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 15, 1994

Pope argues that a welfare plan amendment reducing coverage for certain medical benefits enacted by Central States’ Joint Board of Trustees (“the Joint Board”) is reviewable under ERISA’s fiduciary duty standards. … (quoting Musto v.

United States v. Willard Hardaway

350 F.2d 1021 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 23, 1965

He also provided in his judgment: “The Defendant shall become eligible for parole at such time as the Board of Parole may determine.” … It appears that Judge Medina, in a well considered opinion in United States v.

James G. Jackson v. City of Columbus, Gregory Lashutka, Thomas W. Rice, Sr.

194 F.3d 737 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 17, 1999

Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568, 88 . S.Ct. 1731, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … In support of this claim, he cites Cleveland Board of Education v.