Case law

Haddad v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 9, 2006

See Tzankov v. … . § 1252(a); Prekaj v. INS, 384 F.3d 265, 268 (6th Cir. 2004). “The decision to grant or deny a motion to reopen . . . is within the discretion of the Board.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a).

National Labor Relations Board v. Baddour, Inc.

848 F.2d 193 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 19, 1988

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BADDOUR, INC., Respondent. No. 86-6224. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. May 19, 1988. Before DAVID A. NELSON and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and S. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951); NLRB v. Okun Bros.

Haywood Cash and Rennell Cash v. Swifton Land Corporation

434 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1970

See Foster v. Mobile County Hospital Board, 398 F.2d 227 (5th Cir. 1968) (five members too few to make a class action); Smith v. Board of Education, 365 F.2d 770 (8th Cir. 1966) (seven members too few); Perry v. … See Gray v. Board of Trustees of the University of Tennessee, 342 U.S. 517 , 72 S.Ct. 432 , 96 L.Ed. 540 (1952). The original complaint, however, of the Appellants sought damages, as well as injunctive relief.

United States v. Robert E. Smith (98-5888) Kathy Burch (98-5894) Raymond Burch (98-5895) Danny Eakles (98-5898) Deborah Eakles (98-5939)

197 F.3d 225 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 24, 1999

See Pinkerton v. United States, 145 F.2d 252 (5th Cir.1944). The Supreme Court adopted this rule in Brown v. … It seems that the Sixth Circuit has not addressed the Brown v. Elliott rule since 1923. See Hammerschmidt v. United States, 287 F. 817 (6th Cir.1923). 2 .

Alonzo Bullock, William A. Brakebill, Lawrence J. Brantley, Clyde A. Cook, Mary Nell Currier and Willard H. Till v. United States of America, Frederick John Kasper v. United States

265 F.2d 683 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 15, 1959

As pointed out by Chief Judge Simons in Kasper v. Brittain, supra, it would seem that the case of Brown v. … County Board of Education of Anderson County, Tennessee, supra, constitute a conclusive response to appellants' contentions on this point. As the Supreme Court stated in Brown v.

Capobianco v. Summers

377 F.3d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 23, 2004

A regulation promulgated by the Tennessee Board of Chiropractic Examiners, the licensing board for all practitioners of chiropractic in Tennessee, restricts such solicitations. … Florida Bar, 515 U.S. at 632 , 115 S.Ct. 2371 (citing Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y. v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469, 480 , 109 S.Ct. 3028 , 106 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989)).

Manning v. Unknown Parties

56 F. App'x 710 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 4, 2003

The parole board informed Manning that he had to complete the RGC recommendations, but that the board was not responsible for entering him into the assaultive offender program. … See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 487 , 115 S.Ct. 2293 , 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); Murdock v. Washington, 193 F.3d 510, 513 (7th Cir. 1999).

John Paterek v. Village of Armada

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 8, 2015

Ultimately, the Village Council dissolved the DDA board in early 2013 and appointed Delecke as the new Chairman of the DDA; the Planning Commission constituted the new board. … See, e.g., Brown v. Crowley, 312 F.3d 782, 790 (6th Cir. 2002) (issuing baseless citations in response to a plaintiff’s protected speech activities violates the First Amendment); Warren v.

Rushton v. Schram

143 F.2d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 31, 1944

Oakfield Township Board, 188 Mich. 524, 530 , 154 N.W. 657 ; Board of Sup’rs of Arenac County v. Board of Sup’rs of Iosco County, 158 Mich. 344, 347 , 122 N.W. 629 ; Davis v. Michigan. Cent. R. … An injunction restraining the Board of Escheats from enforcing the Act had been prayed.

Glenn v. Campbell

40 F. App'x 21 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 28, 2002

Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir. 1999); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998). … Wyatt, 193 F.3d at 878 ; Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tuttle

89 F.2d 112 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1937

We conclude that Douglas v. Will-cuts does not reach the present case, and that the Board of Tax Appeals’ decision *116 was right. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Rommel-McFerran Co. v. Local Union No. 369, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

361 F.2d 658 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 31, 1966

See, e. g., Labor Board v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, 191 F.2d 65 (C.A.2d Cir.); Piezonki v. Labor Board, 219 F.2d 879 (C.A.4th Cir.); Labor Board v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters, 212 F.2d 216 (C.A.7th Cir.); Labor Board v. … Local 761, International Union of Electrical Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 366 U.S. 667, 677 , 81 S.Ct. 1285, 1291 , 6 L.Ed.2d 592 (1961).

Dennis L. Vertin v. Gary Gabry

70 F.3d 116 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1995

See Sweeton v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1164-65 (6th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1118 (1995). … However, because the amendments do not divest the Parole Board of its discretion in granting parole, the amendments do not qualify as ex post facto laws. See United States v.

Frederick Spalla v. Dale Foltz

788 F.2d 400 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1986

See also Brown v. Davis, 752 F.2d 1142, 1144 (6th Cir.1985); Fuller v. Anderson, 662 F.2d 420, 423 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1028 , 102 S.Ct. 1734 , 72 L.Ed.2d 150 (1982). … In Raper v.

Hudson Motor Car Co. v. City of Detroit

136 F.2d 574 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 22, 1943

In its complaint, appellant alleged that the Board of Assessors of the City of Detroit, the Common Council of the City of Detroit, sitting as a Board of Review with the approval of the Michigan State Tax Commission, valued … State of Missouri v. Dockery, 191 U.S. 165, 171 , 24 S.Ct. 53 , 48 L.Ed. 133 , 63 L.R.A. 571 ; Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of Wakefield, 247 U.S. 350, 353 , 38 S.Ct. 495 , 62 L.Ed. 1154 ; Baker v.

Peabody Coal Co. v. Holskey

888 F.2d 440 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 24, 1989

The Board’s decision must be upheld if it was based upon “substantial evidence.” Under this test, “an appellate tribunal may not reweigh the evidence or make credibility determinations.” Adams v. … See Borgeson v. Kaiser Steel Corp., BRB No. 81-1834 BLA (Oct. 10, 1985); York v. Benefits Review Board, 819 F.2d 134 (6th Cir.1987).

Willie Hullom v. Howard T. Ziel, Clerk

266 F.2d 546 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 24, 1959

Phillips v. McCauley, 9 Cir, 92 F.2d 790 . The jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals is exclusively appellate. … Roche v. Evaporated Milk Association, 319 U.S. 21, 25-26 , 63 S.Ct. 938 , 87 L.Ed. 1185 . Compare: Brown v. Beckham, Clerk, 6 Cir, 137 F.2d 644, 647 , certiorari denied 320 U.S. 803 , 64 S.Ct. 430 , 88 L.Ed. 485 .

Fegley v. Higgins

19 F.3d 1126 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 26, 1994

Before: JONES, Circuit Judge; BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge; and WEBER, District Judge. * BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. 1 Plaintiff Robert Fegley ("Fegley") and defendant Foremost Industries, Inc. … Posner v.

Ford v. Nicks

741 F.2d 858 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 20, 1984

Ford, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Chancellor Roy S. NICKS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer, State of Tennessee Board of Regents; Governor Ray Blanton; C.C. … Bond; Wayne Brown; Sam Ingram; Kenneth Ezell; Edward S. Porter; Dale Glover; James H. Jones, Jr.; Charles J. Liner; Johnella H. Martin; Ella V. Ross; J. Frank Taylor; J.

Miller v. Blackwell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 29, 2004

- - Nos. 04-4299/4300/4301 v. … hearings, including those already scheduled, regarding the pre-election challenges to voter eligibility at issue 1 Nos. 04-4299/4300/4301 Miller, et al. v.