Case law

Swaim v. Commissioner

417 F.2d 358 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 17, 1969

In Swaim v. … In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.

John Chanik and Betty Chanik v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

492 F.2d 1182 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 4, 1974

Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 26 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 173-174 , 89 S.Ct. 961 , 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1968); United States v.

United States v. Diamond Match Co.

115 F. 288 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 1902

It was so held by this court in Warehouse Co. v. Collector of Customs, 1 C. C. A. 371 , 49 Fed. 561 , 6 U. S. App. 53. But the method and system of review remain unaltered. … In Muhlenberg Co. v. Dyer, 13 C. C. A. 64 , 65 Fed. 634 , 31 U. S.

Landesman-Hirschheimer Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.

44 F.2d 521 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 1930

Baker & Taylor Co. v. U. S., 26 F.(2d) 187 (C. C. A. 2). … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is therefore affirmed.

Roberto Hernandez-Serrano v. Merrick B. Garland

30 F.4th 535 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 2022

v. … No. 20-3175 Hernandez-Serrano v.

Eugene Woodard v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

107 F.3d 1178 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 3, 1997

Id. at 249-50 , 103 S.Ct. at 1747-48 ; see also Sweeton v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1164-65 (6th Cir.1994) (en banc) (following Olim ), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1158 , 115 S.Ct. 1118 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1082 (1995). … See, e.g., Board of County Comm'rs v. Umbehr, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996) (free speech); FCC v.

Peabody Coal v. Dir. OWCP

342 F.3d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 25, 2003

More than a mere scintilla, substantial evidence is the award of benefits to the Benefits Review Board (“the that which “a reasonable mind might accept as adequately Board”). The Board affirmed. … In Tussey v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Schmidlin, Inc.

865 F.2d 1268 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 3, 1989

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner (87-6049), Cross-Respondent (87-6065), Respondent (87-6089), v. … Southport Petroleum Co. v. NLRB, 315 U.S. 100, 106 (1942).

National Labor Relations Board v. The Akron Paint and Varnish Company

935 F.2d 270 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1991

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The AKRON PAINT AND VARNISH COMPANY, Respondent. No. 89-6082. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 11, 1991. Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and DAVID A. … ORDER 1 Upon the motion of the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") for an order permitting the Board to withdraw its petition for adjudication in civil contempt against the respondent Akron Paint and Varnish Company

Ziegler v. Aukerman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 14, 2008

Donna Brown, a doctor at the hospital. Dr. Brown then met with Plaintiff and determined that she was depressed and suicidal. … Brown requested that Plaintiff be hospitalized. Some time after Dr. Brown signed the certificate, Plaintiff stated that the law did not allow the hospital to hold her and she announced her intention to leave.

Parker v. Renico

506 F.3d 444 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 17, 2007

Id. at 324 n. 16, 99 S.Ct. 2781 ; see also Brown v. Palmer, 441 F.3d 347, 351 (6th Cir.2006). … Recently, in Brown v.

Kimberly Ann Carlson v. Raymond Henry Conklin, Perry Johnson

813 F.2d 769 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 12, 1987

Regardless of whether, as a matter of state tort law, the parole board could be said either to have had a ‘duty’ to avoid harm to his victim or to have proximately caused her death, see Grimm v. … He was in no sense an agent of the parole board. Cf. Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 US 232 , 40 LEd2d 90 , 94 SCt 1683 , 71 Ohio Ops2d 474.

Cooper v. Overton

83 F. App'x 791 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 11, 2003

Knuckles El v. Toombs, 215 F.3d 640, 642 (6th Cir.2000); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 . … See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 645 (6th Cir. 1999); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Link Corporation

869 F.2d 1492 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 23, 1989

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LINK CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 88-5776. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 23, 1989. Before WELLFORD and ALAN E. … See NLRB v.

Dustin W. Seal v. Allen Morgan, Superintendent, Knox County School (99-5090/5600) Knox County Board of Education (99-5600),defendants-Appellants, Vicki Dunaway, Principal, Powell High School

229 F.3d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 6, 2000

See Vacco v. … Rosa R. v.

Comcast Cablevision-Taylor, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, Communications Workers of America Local 4100, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

232 F.3d 490 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 14, 2000

NLRB v. … See NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Akron Paint and Varnish Company

890 F.2d 416 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 1, 1989

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The AKRON PAINT AND VARNISH COMPANY, Respondent. No. 89-6082. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 1, 1989. Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and ALAN E. … ORDER 1 On August 28, 1989, the National Labor Relations Board ("The Board") filed an application for enforcement of its April 24, 1989, order in Board Case No. 8-CA-20959 wherein it found the respondent committed an unfair

Alfred Kwamena Newton and Florita S. Newton v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

736 F.2d 336 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1984

See Mathews v. … In Velasco v.

Susan P. Asmo v. Keane, Inc.

471 F.3d 588 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 18, 2006

DiCarlo also cites Brown v. … See Brown v. Mark, 709 F.2d 1499 (6th Cir. Mar.3, 1983) (listed only as a one-line entry reading “Affirmed” in an Unreported Decision section of that volume of the Federal Reporter 2d). Therefore, Brown v.

Charles Johnston v. Arnold R. Jago

691 F.2d 283 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 22, 1982

Upon the execution of this document, the Appellant shall withdraw his appeal before the State Personnel Board of Review. 6. … As the Supreme Court stated in Maher v.