Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

2.82s

  • Wesley v. Lamanna

    27 F. App'x 438 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 30, 2001

    See Charles v. Chandler, 180 F.3d 753, 755 (6th Cir.1999). … See generally Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Aguirre

    410 F.3d 297 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 2005

    See, e.g., Ellis v. … Carpenters Council Health & Welfare Fund v. C.J. Rogers, Inc., 933 F.2d 376, 384 (6th Cir. 1991) (citing Laborers’ Pension Trust Fund v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Shea v. United States

    224 F. 426 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 1915

    Brown (C. C. A. 4) 120 Fed. 496 , 56 C. C. A. 646 . … Evans v. State Bank, supra; Chamberlain Transp. Co. v. South Pier Coal Co., supra; Gould v. United States, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Timothy Moxley v. The Ohio State University

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 2022

    Doe v. Brown Univ., 896 F.3d at 131. … Snyder-Hill, 48 F.4th at 708–09 (quoting Doe v. Brown Univ., 896 F.3d at 132).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reison Gray v. John W. Wingo, Warden Kentucky State Penitentiary

    391 F.2d 268 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 22, 1967

    Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). Ground (3) is without merit because petitioner has not availed himself of the post-conviction procedure provided by Kentucky laws.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Technicote Corp.

    865 F.2d 260 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 22, 1988

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TECHNICOTE CORP., Respondent. No. 88-6128. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 22, 1988. ORDER 1 Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and NATHANIEL R. … . * 2 This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for summary entry of a judgment against Respondent, Technicote Corp., Memphis, Tennessee, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. B and R Coal Co., Inc.

    869 F.2d 1491 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 17, 1989

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. B AND R COAL CO., INC., Respondent. No. 88-6007. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 17, 1989. 1 Before RALPH B. GUY and ALAN E. … ORDER 2 This Court having on May 14, 1987, entered its judgment enforcing in full the backpay provision of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, the Board, on June 30, 1988, issued its Supplemental Decision and

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Shelton Heating and Air Conditioning Co.

    865 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 22, 1988

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SHELTON HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING CO., Respondent. No. 88-6198. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 22, 1988. ORDER 1 Before BOYCE F. … JONES, Circuit Judges and JOHN FEIKENS, Senior District Judge. * 2 This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for summary entry of a judgment against Respondent, Shelton Heating and

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Craigmiles v. Giles

    312 F.3d 220 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 2002

    In City of Cleburne v. … See Saenz v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Robert Wayne Storey v. Local 327, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters

    759 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 1985

    However, section 301 does not provide the only exception to the rule that the Board has exclusive jurisdiction. In Vaca v. … In Vaca v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • J. Ralph Erwin v. William L. Neal

    494 F.2d 1351 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 10, 1974

    We so held in Madison v. … Emerson v. Machamer, 221 Tenn. 739 , 431 S.W.2d 283 (1968); Brown v. Dunstan, 219 Tenn. 291 , 409 S.W.2d 365 (1966). In our opinion plaintiff could have asserted his cause of action on May 28, 1969. Hodge v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lawrence Wagner v. John J. Gilligan, Governor

    609 F.2d 866 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 19, 1979

    Thereafter, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Greenholtz v. … Accord, Bell v. Kentucky Parole Board, 556 F.2d 805, 808 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 960 , 98 S.Ct. 492 , 54 L.Ed.2d 320 (1977).

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Surgical Appliance Industries, Inc., Respondent(s)

    9 F.3d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 21, 1993

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SURGICAL APPLIANCE INDUSTRIES, INC., Respondent(s). No. 93-6191. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Oct. 21, 1993. … enforced; and that the Respondent, Surgical Appliance Industries, Inc., its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, abide by and perform the directions of the Board in said order contained.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. C & H Moving and Storage Company

    932 F.2d 969 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 14, 1991

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. C & H MOVING AND STORAGE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 90-6377. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. … judgment granting enforcement of the Board's decision should be entered. 5 It therefore is ORDERED that the Board's application for summary enforcement of its decision in Case No. 7-CA-29536 is granted.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In Re Griggs

    965 F.2d 54 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 18, 1992

    See United States v. Brown, 915 F.2d 219, 223 (6th Cir.1990). 7 We begin by examining the texts and purposes of the two statutes at issue in this case. … See Marietta Baptist Tabernacle v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bernard C. Hasson and Helen Hasson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    239 F.2d 778 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 1956

    Hoefle v. … Under the statute the court may modify or reverse the decision of the Board only if it is ‘not in accordance with law’ ”. In Burford-Toothaker Tractor Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Storer Communications of Jefferson County, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    876 F.2d 104 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1989

    STORER COMMUNICATIONS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, INCORPORATED, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. … ORDER 1 On petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board, 2 This cause came on to be heard on the record of the Board, and the briefs of the parties.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ohio Republican Party v. Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 30, 2008

    Nos. 08-4242/4243/4251 Ohio Republican Party et al. v. … Nos. 08-4242/4243/4251 Ohio Republican Party et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benjamin Gray v. Edward D. Nelson and Joyce Blackburn, Defendants-Counter and the Board of County Road Commissioners of the County of Livingston, Defendant-Counter Martha Tibbs Gray v. The Board of County Road Commissioners of the County of Livingston

    533 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 1976

    NELSON and Joyce Blackburn, Defendants-Counter Plaintiffs, and The Board of County Road Commissioners of the County of Livingston, Defendant-Counter Defendant-Appellee. Martha Tibbs GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Zimmer v. State Highway Department, 60 Mich.App. 769 , 231 N.W.2d 519 (1975); Kerkstra v. State Highway Depart., 60 Mich.App. 761 , 231 N.W.2d 521 (1975); Stremler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Luis Cuellar Garcia v. William P. Barr

    960 F.3d 893 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 8, 2020

    Amir v. Gonzales, 467 F.3d 921, 927 (6th Cir. 2006). In doing so, our circuit abrogated a prior Board of Immigration Appeals decision known as In re S-V-, 22 I. & N. … I would therefore vacate the Board’s order dated October 5, 2018, and remand to the Board for review of Garcia’s asylum application under the reasoning set forth in J.O.P. v. Department of Homeland Security.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.