Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

1.01s

  • Deeds v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    47 F.2d 695 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 4, 1931

    Upon this issue the finding of the Board is affirmed. 2. … Compare Stranahan v. Commissioner, 42 F.(2d) 729 (C. C. A. 6); Sherman & Bryan v. Blair, 35 F.(2d) 713 (C. C. A. 2); Minnehaha National Bank v. Commissioner, 28 F.(2d) 763 (C. C. A. 8).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Kennison v. Kanzler

    4 F.2d 315 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 13, 1925

    Co. v. Soutter, 2 Wall. 510 , 17 L. Ed. 860 ; Wilder v. New Orleans (C. C.) 87 F. 843 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Hawkins, 74 F. 395 , 20 C. C. A. 468 , 33 L. R. A. 739; Hamilton v. David C. … Compare Lewis v. Monson, 151 U. S. 545, 549 ; St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. v. St. Paul Water Commissioners, 168 U. S. 349, 358 ; Archer v. Greenville Gravel Co., 233 U. S. 60, 68, 69 ; Guffey v. Smith, 237 U.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Mascot Stove Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.

    120 F.2d 153 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 1941

    Co. v. Com’r of Int. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Kramer v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

    571 F.3d 499 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 2009

    Co. v. Glenn, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2343 , 171 L.Ed.2d 299 (2008). … Moon v. Unum Provident Corp., 405 F.3d 373, 379 (6th Cir.2005).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • N'Diom v. Gonzales

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 24, 2006

    Guo v. … See Sako v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Winston v. General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89

    93 F.3d 251 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 22, 1996

    See, e.g., Humphrey v. Moore, 375 U.S. 335 , 84 S.Ct. 363 , 11 L.Ed.2d 370 (1964); Hines v. … This kind of prospective claim was recognized as a valid § 301 claim in Humphrey v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. R.J. Liddy Moving and Transport, Inc.

    960 F.2d 149 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 14, 1992

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. R.J. LIDDY MOVING AND TRANSPORT, INC., Respondent. No. 92-5457. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 14, 1992. Before ALAN E. … Said payments will be mailed to the Regional Office of the Seventh Region of the Board, where they shall be held in escrow until the issuance of the Board's Supplemental Order, at which time all payments held in escrow will

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Black v. Ryder/P.I.E. Nationwide, Inc.

    15 F.3d 573 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 2, 1994

    See, e.g., Brown v. International Bhd, of Elec. Workers Local Union No. 58, 936 F.2d 251 , 255 (6th Cir.1991). … Brown v. International Bhd. of Elec. Workers Local Union No. 58, 936 F.2d 251 , 255 (6th Cir.1991).

    Cited 192 timesPublished
  • United States v. Anthony Ozomaro

    44 F.4th 538 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 2022

    United States v. Brown, 823 F.2d 591, 596 (D.C. Cir. 1987). To avoid the danger that a juror will be discharged based on their view of the evidence, the D.C. … The Second Circuit adopted the Brown rule in its entirety. See United States v. Thomas, 116 F.3d 606, 622 (2d Cir. 1997).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Marc David Manson v. George C. Edwards, Clerk for the City of Detroit

    482 F.2d 1076 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 12, 1973

    See Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 , 90 S.Ct. 1153 , 25 L.Ed.2d 491 (1970); McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961); Robinson v. Board of Regents, 475 F.2d 707 (6th Cir. 1973). … In McDonald v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Mertik v. Blalock

    983 F.2d 1353 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 15, 1993

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-71 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Procedural Due Process — Property Interest The federal Constitution does not create property interests. … Joseph Bros. v. Brown, 65 Ohio App.2d 43 , 415 N.E.2d 987, 990 (1979) (citations omitted). Whether or not the law of Ohio expressly confers property right status on contract rights is not controlling for our analysis.

    Cited 163 timesPublished
  • Rich-Sampliner Co. v. Ensten

    291 F. 1003 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 1923

    Without deciding whether the Henry application, as disclosed by this record, is so far within the principle of Brown v. Guild and Brown v. Selby, 90 U. S. (23 Wall.) 181 , 23 L. … In Coffin v. Odgen, 85 U. S. (18 Wall.) 120 , 21 L.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rochester Harris v. James Blanchard, Robert Brown, Dale Foltz

    848 F.2d 191 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1988

    Rochester HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James BLANCHARD, Robert Brown, Dale Foltz, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-2100. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. May 13, 1988. 1 Before WELLFORD and ALAN E. … See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (1973). 4 Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. * The Honorable R. Allan Edgar, U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Fingal E. Johnson v. Chris Daniels G.B. Brown Robert Atherton

    70 F.3d 1272 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 20, 1995

    JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chris DANIELS; G.B. Brown; Robert Atherton, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-1981. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 20, 1995. … See King v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Groseclose v. Dutton

    788 F.2d 356 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 14, 1986

    Bradley v. … Id. at 209; accord: Liddell v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 693 F.2d 721 (8th Cir. 1981).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Karen Strehlke v. Grosse Pointe Pub. Sch. Sys.

    654 F. App'x 713 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 2016

    See Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297, 322-23 , 100 S.Ct. 2671 , 65 L.Ed.2d 784 (1980); Wilson v. Yaklich, 148 F.3d 596, 604 (6th Cir. 1998). 1. Plaintiffs first argue, relying on Brown v. … Brown mandates that GPPSS provide “on equal terms” the educational opportunities it undertakes to provide. Id. at 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686 .

    Cited 5 timesUnpublished
  • W. B. Sanders, Etc. v. International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Charles Hobbs, Etc., Cross-Appellants v. W. B. Sanders, Cross-Appellee. Local Union 595, Etc. v. International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Wilford B. Sanders v. John H. Lyons, Etc., John H. Lyons, Etc., Cross-Appellants v. Wilford B. Sanders, Cross-Appellee

    235 F.2d 271 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 1956

    SANDERS, Etc., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL & ORNAMENTAL IRON WORKERS et al., Appellees. Charles HOBBS, Etc., et al., Cross-Appellants, v. W. B. SANDERS, Cross-Appellee. … LOCAL UNION 595, Etc., et al., Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL & ORNAMENTAL IRON WORKERS, et al., Appellees. Wilford B. SANDERS et al., Appellants, v. John H.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Singh v. Lynch

    638 F. App'x 487 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 3, 2016

    Thompson v. Lynch, 788 F.3d 638, 642 (6th Cir.2015) (quoting Camaj v. Holder, 625 F.3d 988, 991 (6th Cir.2010)). When the Board provides its own reasoning for affirming the denial of relief, we review only its decision. … (citing Cordova v. Gonzales, 245 Fed.Appx. 508, 511-12 (6th Cir.2007)). To the extent that the Board adopts the reasoning of the Immigration Judge, we also review that decision. Al-Ghorbani v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • OPAWL - Building AAPI Feminist v. Dave Yost

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 2025

    Brown v. Ent. Merchs. Ass’n, 564 U.S. 786, 799 (2011). Satisfying the standard requires pointing to “record evidence or legislative findings demonstrating the need to address a special problem.” … Brown, 564 U.S. at 804. Ohio responds by arguing that the Supreme Court upheld speech restrictions under strict scrutiny in four cases: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, Bluman v. FEC, Burson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jeremy Duval

    742 F.3d 246 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 7, 2014

    The Duvals principally rely on People v. Brown, 825 N.W.2d 91 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012), in making this argument, but their reliance is misplaced. … Brown, 825 N.W.2d at 94 (internal quotation marks omitted). Nos. 12-2338/2339 United States v. Duval, et al.

    Cited 34 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.