Case law

Opdyke Investment Company v. City of Detroit

883 F.2d 1265 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 25, 1989

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), that the federal antitrust laws were not intended to apply to municipalities. In City of Lafayette v. … Woolen v.

Clark B. GIBSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Defendant-Appellee

946 F.2d 1229 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1991

Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio, 490 U.S. 642 , 109 S.Ct. 2115 , 104 L.Ed.2d 733 (1989); Hazelwood School District v. United States, 433 U.S. 299, 308 , 97 S.Ct. 2736, 2741-42 , 53 L.Ed.2d 768 (1977). … Lynch v. Freeman, 817 F.2d 380, 383 (6th Cir.1987). Plaintiff has failed in carrying his “ultimate burden of persuasion regardless of the theory under which [he] proceeds.” Lynch, 817 F.2d at 383 .

The Associated Press v. Taft-Ingalls Corporation

323 F.2d 114 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 7, 1963

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 306 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1513 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 . In United States v. F. & M. … Brown v. United States, 225 F.2d 861, 863 (C.A. 8). Moreover, cases have held that an earlier docket entry did not constitute a judgment though it included the word. Securities and Exchange Comm. v. Jean R.

United States v. Gary McClellan A/K/A Jerome L. McClellan A/K/A James Johnson A/K/A Lenn Jerome Johnson A/K/A Kent Jackson

38 F.3d 1217 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 25, 1994

United States v. … In United States v.

Robinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

63 F.2d 652 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1933

The Board of Tax Appeals affirmed (21 B. T. … The order of the Board is affirmed.

Hygienic Products Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

111 F.2d 330 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 12, 1940

Niles Bement Pond Co. v. United States, supra; United States v. Anderson, supra. … See United States v. Anderson, supra; Niles Bement Pond Co. v. United States, supra. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Kales v. United States

115 F.2d 497 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 9, 1940

Woodworth v. Kales, supra. … Compare Reynolds v. McMurray, 10 Cir., 77 F.2d 740 ; Ferguson v. United States, Ct.Cl., 2 F.Supp. 1012 .

Bradley v. Milliken

828 F.2d 1186 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 18, 1987

Board of School Comm’rs of Indianapolis, Ind., 466 F.2d 573, 575 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 909 , 93 S.Ct. 964 , 35 L.Ed.2d 271 (1973); Liddell v. … Bradley v. Milliken, 620 F.2d 1141, 1142 (intervenor’s arguments had already been raised by the Detroit School Board and the court had ordered that the issues be taken into account).

Sergio Waldmir Billeke-Tolosa v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

385 F.3d 708 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 30, 2004

See Mickeviciute v. INS, 327 F.3d 1159 , 1164 n. 4 (10th Cir.2003); Okpa v. INS, 266 F.3d 313, 317 (4th Cir.2001); Najjar v. Ashcroft, 257 F.3d 1262 , 1297 (11th Cir.2001); Bernal-Vallejo v. … Nor would the BIA itself endorse such a view, as its own regulations provide that “[ejxcept as Board decisions may be modified or overruled by the Board or the Attorney General, decisions of the Board, and decisions of the

National Labor Relations Board v. Nrc, Inc.

933 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 21, 1991

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NRC, INC., Respondent. No. 91-5311. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. May 21, 1991. Before ALAN E. … Any questions concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Board's Office, 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 300, Detroit, Michigan 48226-2569, Telephone 313-226-3219.

Harrison v. City Of Pontiac

285 F.2d 305 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 18, 1961

HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PONTIAC, MICH., Board of Trustees of Pontiac General Hospital, Medical Staff of Pontiac General Hospital, a voluntary unincorporated association, Defendants-Appellees. … See also Martinson v.

United States of America Ex Rel. Alexander Piscione v. John M. Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration & Naturalization Service

234 F.2d 810 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 5, 1956

Appellant’s appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals was dismissed by the Board on November 19, 1954 and a warrant of deportation was issued on December 3, 1954 on the three grounds above stated. … Tisi v. Tod, 264 U.S. 131 , 44 S.Ct. 260 , 68 L.Ed. 590 ; Zakonaite v. Wolf, 226 U.S. 272 , 33 S.Ct. 31 , 57 L.Ed. 218 . The judgment is affirmed.

Daniel Grand v. City of University Heights, Ohio

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 2025

Only the zoning board, not Brennan or McConville, can answer that question. … Due to Grand’s decision to withdraw his special use application, the zoning board had no application to act on, leaving us with “no idea” how the ordinance works in this setting. Toilet Goods Ass’n, Inc. v.

Elnemr v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

95 F. App'x 121 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 15, 2004

In Suassuna v. INS, this Court reaffirmed decisions in Ashki v. INS, 233 F.3d 913 (6th Cir.2000), and Bartoszewska-Zajac v. … See Yuk v. Ashcroft, 355 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2004); Dia v. Ashcroft, 353 F.3d 228 (3d Cir.2003); Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845 (9th Cir.2003); Georgis v. Ashcroft, 328 F.3d 962 (7th Cir.2003); Mendoza v. U.S.

In Re Griggs

965 F.2d 54 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 18, 1992

See United States v. Brown, 915 F.2d 219, 223 (6th Cir.1990). 7 We begin by examining the texts and purposes of the two statutes at issue in this case. … See Marietta Baptist Tabernacle v.

Union Stockyards Bank of Wichita v. Hamilton

246 F. 580 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 15, 1917

To like effect are Gillespie v. Brown, 16 Neb. 457 , 20 N. W. 632 , Payne v. King, 141 Mo. App. 246 , 124 S. W. 1066 , and National Register Co. v. Slater, 156 Mo. App. 733 , 137 S. … In Gillespie v.

Storey v. Local 327, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers

759 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 1985

However, section 301 does not provide the only exception to the rule that the Board has exclusive jurisdiction. In Vaca v. … In Vaca v.

Grand Trunk Ry. Co. of Canada v. Knapp

233 F. 950 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 1916

The procedure to recover is by filing claim with the Industrial Accident Board and arbitration in case of disagreement between employer and employé, with a righj of review by the Accident Board of the arbitrator’s findings … , the action of the Board being final except that the Supreme Court may review questions of law involved.

Sharon Puckett, Cross-Appellee v. Tennessee Eastman Company, Cross-Appellant

889 F.2d 1481 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 7, 1989

In Zipes v. … Jones v. American State Bank, 857 F.2d 494, 499-500 (8th Cir.1988); Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Co., 744 F.2d 354, 358 (3d Cir.1984); Wrighten v.

Vance L. Wiley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Frank D. Wiley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

266 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 24, 1959

In Schaeffer v. … Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193, 200-201 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 ; Heiner v. Mellon, 304 U.S. 271, 276 , 58 S.Ct. 926 , 82 L.Ed. 1337 ; Burnet v.