Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

1.76s

  • General Telephone Co. Of Ohio v. Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio

    648 F.2d 452 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 1981

    In United Steelworkers of America v. … This Court, in Timken Co. v. Local U.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • United States v. Laquinton Perry

    864 F.3d 412 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 19, 2017

    United States v. Spikes, 158 F.3d 913, 924 (6th Cir. 1998) (quoting United States v. … United States v. Brown, 732 F.3d 569, 572–73 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Greene, 250 F.3d at 478).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Darryl White v. Detroit Edison Company, Utility Workers Union of America Afl-Cio, and Utility Workers Union of America Local 223

    472 F.3d 420 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 22, 2006

    The district court granted Local 223’s motion, noting that under Vaca v. … He made an internal motion to this effect with the Local 223 executive board, and the motion was seconded by board member Stan Kulik.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Willie Worthams v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools

    936 F.2d 574 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1991

    See, e.g., American Postal Workers Union v. … See Policy v.

    Cited 3 timesUnpublished
  • David M. Brown v. The Equitable Financial Companies U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

    959 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 1992

    BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE EQUITABLE FINANCIAL COMPANIES; U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-5975. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. … Brown objected. The district court accepted that recommendation, and then denied Brown's motion to strike responsive pleadings and motions. Brown filed a document entitled "Record".

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Textron Inc.

    359 F.2d 966 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 10, 1966

    The company argues that the pension plan was not and could not be terminated under Article VIII without formal action of its Board of Directors. … Section 3 of Article V of the plan provides: “The Company shall have no right, title or interest in the contributions made by it to the trustee and no part of the pension or insured fund shall revert to the Company * * *

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. William Stivers

    722 F.3d 788 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 17, 2013

    Election officers are appointed by the Clay County Board of Elections (the “Board”), which must also certify the results. The Board was alleged to be the racketeering enterprise in this conspiracy. … On appeal, Adams does not challenge these instructions; instead, he argues that he was not associated with the Board of Elections because (1) he was not a member of the Board, (2) he could not have controlled the Board in

    Cited 146 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Zurbrick

    59 F.2d 937 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1932

    A.) 23 F.(2d) 918 , and NG Sui Wing v. United States (C. C. A.) 46 F. (2d) 755. The fact that the appellant’s ’■ original entry was legal does not help him. United States v. Day, supra. … Nor is the question affected by Browne v. Zurbrick, 45 F.(2d) 931 (6 C. C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Peabody Coal Co. v. Odom

    342 F.3d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 25, 2003

    Peabody Coal Company and its insurer, Old Republic Insurance Company (collectively referred to as "Peabody" hereinafter), appealed the award of benefits to the Benefits Review Board ("the Board"). The Board affirmed. … See Sharondale, 42 F.3d at 996 ; Woodward v. Director, OWCP, 991 F.2d 314 , 319 (6th Cir. 1993); Saginaw Mining Co. v. Ferda, 879 F.2d 198, 205 (6th Cir.1989); Orange v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Denko v. INS

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 2003

    existing Board o r federal court precedent and does 8 C.F.R. § 100 3.1(a)(7). No. 02-3746 Denko v. INS 13 14 Denko v. … .”); see also Mendoza v. Board, such review is not constitutionally compelled. The U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Daneshvar v. INS

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 20, 2004

    Amadou v. Board concluded that the record provided “little apparent INS, 226 F.3d 724 (6th Cir. 2000). … Accordingly, we reverse the Board’s order denying Petitioner’s motion for No. 02-3653 Daneshvar v. Ashcroft 23 24 Daneshvar v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Gilbert G. Hamel

    551 F.2d 107 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 10, 1977

    Brown, 482 F.2d 1359, 1360 (9th Cir. 1973). Affirmed. 1 . The Supreme Court discussed the reasons for the amendments in Environmental Protection Agency v. … State Water Resources Control Board, 426 U.S. 200 , 96 S.Ct. 2022 , 48 L.Ed.2d 578 (1976). 2 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Peabody Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

    48 F. App'x 140 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 2, 2002

    Peabody claims the ALJ and the Board have erred as a matter of law in misapplying the statute of limitations to Dukes’s claim. Legal errors are reviewed by this Court de novo. Detroit Free Press v. … The standard of review is well settled in cases appealed from the Benefits Review Board. We will affirm any finding of fact made by an ALJ if supported by substantial evidence. See Glen Coal Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Central Ohio Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

    762 F.3d 483 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 2014

    When the Board upheld the ALJ’s decision, Central Ohio timely appealed the Board’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. … In black-lung-benefits cases, we review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo and review the ALJ’s decision (not the Board’s) to determine whether it was supported by substantial evidence. Greene v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Leevester Pennington v. Stephen Gosselin John Harkness, Charles Ellis Kirk Kande Robert Brown

    848 F.2d 193 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 23, 1988

    Leevester PENNINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen GOSSELIN; John Harkness, Charles Ellis; Kirk Kande; Robert Brown, Defendants. No. 88-1252. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Yvonne Craddock v. FedEx Corp. Servs., Inc.

    102 F.4th 832 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 22, 2024

    See Principal Op. at 12–16; see also Brown v. … Brown, 338 F.3d at 592 (principal op.)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Ballard

    56 F. App'x 705 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 4, 2003

    See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 736-41 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir.1999); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998). … See White v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 899 F.2d 555, 559 (6th Cir.1990).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gishta v. Gonzales

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 2005

    Jocelyn Lopez Wright, David V. … The board’s decision will be upheld if it is “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” Mikhailevitch v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jesse Adams v. Director, Owcp

    886 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 29, 1989

    Thus, in Gibas v. … See also Crisp, 866 F.2d at 184 ; Wright v. Island Creek Coal Co., 824 F.2d 505, 508 (6th Cir.1987); Roberts v. Benefits Review Board, 822 F.2d 636, 638-39 (6th Cir.1987).

    Cited 137 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.