Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.76s
General Telephone Co. Of Ohio v. Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio
648 F.2d 452 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 1981
In United Steelworkers of America v. … This Court, in Timken Co. v. Local U.
Cited 39 timesPublishedUnited States v. Laquinton Perry
864 F.3d 412 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 19, 2017
United States v. Spikes, 158 F.3d 913, 924 (6th Cir. 1998) (quoting United States v. … United States v. Brown, 732 F.3d 569, 572–73 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Greene, 250 F.3d at 478).
Cited 14 timesPublished472 F.3d 420 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 22, 2006
The district court granted Local 223’s motion, noting that under Vaca v. … He made an internal motion to this effect with the Local 223 executive board, and the motion was seconded by board member Stan Kulik.
Cited 19 timesPublished900 F.2d 903 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 18, 1990
See, e.g., Brown v. General Servs. … See, e.g., Chance v. Board of Examiners & Bd. of Educ., 534 F.2d 993 , 998 (2d Cir.1976) ("Congress has clearly placed its stamp of approval upon seniority systems in 42 U.S.C.
Cited 5 timesPublishedWillie Worthams v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools
936 F.2d 574 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1991
See, e.g., American Postal Workers Union v. … See Policy v.
Cited 3 timesUnpublishedDavid M. Brown v. The Equitable Financial Companies U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
959 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 1992
BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE EQUITABLE FINANCIAL COMPANIES; U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-5975. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. … Brown objected. The district court accepted that recommendation, and then denied Brown's motion to strike responsive pleadings and motions. Brown filed a document entitled "Record".
Cited 0 timesUnpublished359 F.2d 966 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 10, 1966
The company argues that the pension plan was not and could not be terminated under Article VIII without formal action of its Board of Directors. … Section 3 of Article V of the plan provides: “The Company shall have no right, title or interest in the contributions made by it to the trustee and no part of the pension or insured fund shall revert to the Company * * *
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. William Stivers
722 F.3d 788 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 17, 2013
Election officers are appointed by the Clay County Board of Elections (the “Board”), which must also certify the results. The Board was alleged to be the racketeering enterprise in this conspiracy. … On appeal, Adams does not challenge these instructions; instead, he argues that he was not associated with the Board of Elections because (1) he was not a member of the Board, (2) he could not have controlled the Board in
Cited 146 timesPublished59 F.2d 937 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1932
A.) 23 F.(2d) 918 , and NG Sui Wing v. United States (C. C. A.) 46 F. (2d) 755. The fact that the appellant’s ’■ original entry was legal does not help him. United States v. Day, supra. … Nor is the question affected by Browne v. Zurbrick, 45 F.(2d) 931 (6 C. C.
Cited 6 timesPublished342 F.3d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 25, 2003
Peabody Coal Company and its insurer, Old Republic Insurance Company (collectively referred to as "Peabody" hereinafter), appealed the award of benefits to the Benefits Review Board ("the Board"). The Board affirmed. … See Sharondale, 42 F.3d at 996 ; Woodward v. Director, OWCP, 991 F.2d 314 , 319 (6th Cir. 1993); Saginaw Mining Co. v. Ferda, 879 F.2d 198, 205 (6th Cir.1989); Orange v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 2003
existing Board o r federal court precedent and does 8 C.F.R. § 100 3.1(a)(7). No. 02-3746 Denko v. INS 13 14 Denko v. … .”); see also Mendoza v. Board, such review is not constitutionally compelled. The U.S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 20, 2004
Amadou v. Board concluded that the record provided “little apparent INS, 226 F.3d 724 (6th Cir. 2000). … Accordingly, we reverse the Board’s order denying Petitioner’s motion for No. 02-3653 Daneshvar v. Ashcroft 23 24 Daneshvar v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Gilbert G. Hamel
551 F.2d 107 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 10, 1977
Brown, 482 F.2d 1359, 1360 (9th Cir. 1973). Affirmed. 1 . The Supreme Court discussed the reasons for the amendments in Environmental Protection Agency v. … State Water Resources Control Board, 426 U.S. 200 , 96 S.Ct. 2022 , 48 L.Ed.2d 578 (1976). 2 .
Cited 24 timesPublishedPeabody Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
48 F. App'x 140 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 2, 2002
Peabody claims the ALJ and the Board have erred as a matter of law in misapplying the statute of limitations to Dukes’s claim. Legal errors are reviewed by this Court de novo. Detroit Free Press v. … The standard of review is well settled in cases appealed from the Benefits Review Board. We will affirm any finding of fact made by an ALJ if supported by substantial evidence. See Glen Coal Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedCentral Ohio Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
762 F.3d 483 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 2014
When the Board upheld the ALJ’s decision, Central Ohio timely appealed the Board’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. … In black-lung-benefits cases, we review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo and review the ALJ’s decision (not the Board’s) to determine whether it was supported by substantial evidence. Greene v.
Cited 33 timesPublishedLeevester Pennington v. Stephen Gosselin John Harkness, Charles Ellis Kirk Kande Robert Brown
848 F.2d 193 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 23, 1988
Leevester PENNINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen GOSSELIN; John Harkness, Charles Ellis; Kirk Kande; Robert Brown, Defendants. No. 88-1252. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedYvonne Craddock v. FedEx Corp. Servs., Inc.
102 F.4th 832 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 22, 2024
See Principal Op. at 12–16; see also Brown v. … Brown, 338 F.3d at 592 (principal op.)
Cited 10 timesPublished56 F. App'x 705 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 4, 2003
See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 736-41 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir.1999); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998). … See White v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 899 F.2d 555, 559 (6th Cir.1990).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 2005
Jocelyn Lopez Wright, David V. … The board’s decision will be upheld if it is “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” Mikhailevitch v.
Cited 0 timesPublished886 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 29, 1989
Thus, in Gibas v. … See also Crisp, 866 F.2d at 184 ; Wright v. Island Creek Coal Co., 824 F.2d 505, 508 (6th Cir.1987); Roberts v. Benefits Review Board, 822 F.2d 636, 638-39 (6th Cir.1987).
Cited 137 timesPublished
Ask Donna