Case law

Uritsky v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 7, 2005

In Devison, the Board considered whether an adjudication as a “youthful offender” under the New York criminal No. 03-4331 Uritsky v. … No. 03-4331 Uritsky v.

Harris v. Birkett

20 F. App'x 443 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 25, 2001

. § 1997e(a); Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1824-25 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). … See Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

Glenn R. Black, M.D. v. Barberton Citizens Hospital

134 F.3d 1265 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 1998

Wolotsky v. Huhn, 960 F.2d 1331, 1335 (6th Cir.1992); see also Ellison v. Garbarino, 48 F.3d 192, 194 (6th Cir.1995). … As we stated in Yashon v.

Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

159 F.2d 940 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 17, 1947

Schechter Poultry Corp. v. … Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v.

United States v. Thomas Eugene Potter

457 F.2d 1316 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 10, 1972

He relies on United States v. Cabbage, 430 F.2d 1037 (6th Cir. 1970). … . § 1604.52 (b) (1971), and that the District Court was advised that, since the Cabbage decision, board membership in that judicial district has been reconstituted. We also observe that in United States v.

NLRB v. St. Francis Health

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 19, 2000

Burgoyne, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. NLRB, 758 F.2d 308 (8th Cir. 1985) (same). … We will deny enforcement of the Board’s bargaining order and remand the case to the Board to conduct an evidentiary hearing on St. Francis’s objection to the second election. 38 NLRB v. St.

Williams v. Order of Commercial Travelers of America

41 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 13, 1930

We do not so certify a question of law unless it seems to us so difficult or doubtful that we feel the necessity of a Supreme Court decision (Cella v. Brown [C. C. … Our former decision is not the law of the case to such an extent as to deprive us of power to review the questions involved and reach another result (Chesapeake, etc., Co. v. McKell [C. C.

Jeff Dye v. Office of the Racing Comm'n

702 F.3d 286 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 18, 2012

R. 49-8 (Brown Aff. at ¶¶ 1-5) (Page ID # 635-36). Brown also states that during meetings, Post would say that “ ‘he did not trust the stewards’ ” and would “make clear his animosity toward the Plaintiff group.” … V.

Maureen Hansen v. Westerville City School District, Board of Education

43 F.3d 1472 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 7, 1994

Smith v. … White v.

Arnold Palmer Golf Company v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.

541 F.2d 584 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 31, 1976

See Godfrey v. Heublein, 219 F.2d 654, 656 (2d Cir. 1955), 1 Corbin on Contracts, § 30. We held in S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. … pleasure of such Board.

Teresa Bartoszewska-Zajac v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

237 F.3d 710 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 12, 2001

Discussion The Board of Immigration Appeals found petitioner ineligible for relief under its interpretation of the 1996 and 1997 laws. We review this legal determination de novo. Kabongo v. … We generally defer to the Board’s interpretation of immigration statutes. INS v. Aguirre Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415, 424-25 , 119 S.Ct. 1439 , 143 L.Ed.2d 590 (1999) (citing Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v.

Gfell v. Rickelman

441 F.2d 444 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 1971

The dress code of which the rule is a part was promulgated under authority of the rules of the Board of Education of West Geauga Local School Board, Art. … Griffin v. Tatum (5th Cir. 1970), 425 F. 2d 201 , 203.” See also Stevenson v. Board of Education (5th Cir. 1970), 426 F. 2d 1154, 1156 .

Island Creek Coal Co. v. Elizabeth Maynard

87 F.4th 802 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 2023

No. 23-3238 Island Creek Coal Co. v. Maynard, et al. Page 5 Board affirmed the award of benefits. Id. at 660 (BRB Dec. at 10). … Standard of Review “In reviewing an appeal from the Board, we review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo.” Ogle, 737 F.3d at 1068.

Colonial Milling Co. v. Commissioner

132 F.2d 505 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 1942

Cudahy Packing Co. v. United States, 7 Cir., 126 F.2d 429 ; United States v. H. T. Poindexter & Sons Merchandise Co., supra. … Andrew Jergens Co. v. Conner, 6 Cir., 125 F.2d 686, 689, 690 . Cf. Luzier’s, Inc. v. Nee, 8 Cir., 106 F.2d 130, 131 , certiorari denied, 309 U.S. 660 , 60 S.Ct. 514 , 84 L.Ed. 1008 ; Honorbilt Products, Inc. v.

Neinast v. Bd Trustees Columbus

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 10, 2003

Co. v. Zenith Radio persons.” Neinast also claims that the Board’s claim of a Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586 (1986). … Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 3 Neinast mischaracterizes the extent of the authority granted to Black by the Board .

Kaelin v. Grubbs

682 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 9, 1982

On April 17, 1979, the Walton-Verona Board of Education ("Board") held a hearing concerning Michael's behavior. The Board did not convene or consult the AARC before or during this hearing. … Doe v.

37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 288, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,072 Roy T. Whitfield, Paris D. Goin, Cross-Appellant v. City of Knoxville, Cross-Appellees

756 F.2d 455 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 6, 1985

. § 1738 ; Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 896 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984); Kremer v. … For a concise statement of the difference between these two doctrines, see Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 894 n. 1, 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984). 3 .

United States v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 2008

Brown, 66 F.3d 124, 129 (6th Cir. 1995) (holding that “abuse of trust [is not] a necessary element of the crime of embezzlement”). … See United States v.

Watler v. Campbell

33 F. App'x 764 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 2002

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 877 (6th Cir.1999); Wright v. Morris, 111 F.3d 414, 417 (6th Cir.1997). … Wyatt, 193 F.3d at 878 ; Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). The district court may not adjudicate an unexhausted claim and must enforce the requirement sua sponte if not raised by the defendant.

A & E Coal Co. v. James Adams

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 11, 2012

The Board concluded that the ALJ did not violate the APA. We review the Board’s conclusion de novo. See Peabody Coal Co. v. Greer, 62 F.3d 801, 804 (6th Cir. 1995). … See Peabody Coal Co. v. Groves, 277 F.3d 829, 836 (6th Cir. 2002). Thus, the ALJ accurately and specifically referenced the evidence supporting his conclusions. The Board was correct to affirm his decision.