Case law

David Couch v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor and Falcon Coal Company

893 F.2d 130 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 26, 1990

Our standard of review in black lung cases was stated in Kolesar v. … However, the Board determined that petitioner failed to establish the requisite elements of Part 410. Moreover, on the basis of this court’s decision in Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v.

Hochevar v. Maryland Casualty Co.

114 F.2d 948 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 15, 1940

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Board of Education, 202 N.C. 354 , 162 S.E. 763 ; Robinson Mfg. Co. v. Blaylock, 192 N.C. 407 , 135 S.E. 136 . See also National Surety Co. v. … County Board of Education, 4 Cir., 15 F.2d 933 ; Claiborne Parish School Board v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 5 Cir., 40 F.2d 577 ; Fort Worth Independent School District v.

United States v. Patrick Galvan (04-1741) Charles Johnson (05-1188)

453 F.3d 738 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 2006

Johnson v. … Harrell, in turn, told another co-conspirator, Gary Brown, to bring the weapon, and Brown complied.

Dunn Brothers, Inc., Dunn & Dunn, Inc., and Pic-Pac Food Stores-Southgate, Inc., D/B/A Pic-Pac Food Stores v. The National Labor Relations Board

321 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 2, 1963

This case is before the Court on a petition for review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. … It is our conclusion that the Order of the Board is not sustained by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The Petition for Enforcement of the Board’s Order is, accordingly, denied.

Modern Products Supply Co. v. Drachenberg

152 F.2d 203 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 13, 1945

Hildreth v. Mastoras, 257 U.S. 2; 42 S.Ct. 20 , 66 L.Ed. 112 ; Consolidated Bunging Apparatus Co. v. Peter Schoenhofen Brewing Co., C.C., 28 F. 428 . … Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. R. Co., 6 Cir., 172 F. 371, 377 ; Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Jiffy Lubricator Co., 8 Cir., 81 F. 2d 786, 793 ; Wire Tie Machinery Co. v. Pacific Box Corporation, 9 Cir., 102 F.2d 543, 556 .

Prater v. Boyd

263 F.2d 788 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 17, 1959

See: Booker v. State of Tennessee Board of Education, 6 Cir., 240 *790 F.2d 689 ] certiorari denied 1957, 353 U.S. 965 , 77 S.Ct. 1050 , 1 L.Ed.2d 915 . … Co., 1914, 232 U.S. 134, 137 , 34 S.Ct. 283 , 58 L.Ed. 538 ; Hawks v. Hamill, 1933, 288 U.S. 52, 60-61 , 53 S.Ct. 240 , 77 L.Ed. 610 ; Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v.

Mx Group, Inc. v. City of Covington

293 F.3d 326 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 2002

See Havens Realty Corp. v. … Bigelow v.

Koch v. Local 438, United Autoworkers Union

54 F. App'x 807 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 2002

After a meeting of the executive board where Blaine described plaintiffs alleged *809 misconduct and advised the board that a letter from Patterson detailing the problems would be forthcoming, the board directed its recording … Corp. v. Allen, 697 S.W.2d 332, 334 (Tenn.1985).

Alder v. Correctional Medical Services

73 F. App'x 839 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 27, 2003

See Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir.2000). … See Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir.1999); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998).

Fairless v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

67 F.2d 475 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 8, 1933

Pierce v. United States, supra; Roche v. Commissioners, 63 F.(2d) 623 (C. C. A. 5). … In this state of the record we are unable to say that the Board of Tax Appeals was in error in its decisions sustaining the respondent. Collin National Bank v. Commissioner, 48 F. (2d) 207 (C. C. A. 5); Stranahan v.

UAW v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 13, 2020

“The Board’s construction of the Act is permissible where it does not ‘exceed the reach’ of the Act.” Meijer, Inc. v. NLRB, 463 F.3d 534, 539 (6th Cir. 2006) (quoting NLRB v. J. … Witness credibility determinations are the Board’s bailiwick and receive even more deference. NLRB v. Galicks, Inc., 671 F.3d 602, 607 (6th Cir. 2012) (citing NLRB v. Taylor Mach.

Pope v. Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Health And Welfare Fund

27 F.3d 211 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 10, 1994

Pope, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … (quoting Musto v.

Walker v. Bethenergy Mines, Inc.

4 F. App'x 218 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 26, 2001

This court must affirm the Board’s decision if the Board has not committed any legal error or exceeded its statutory scope of review of the ALJ’s determination. See Glen Coal Co. v. … See Knuckles v. Director, OWCP, 869 F.2d 996, 998 (6th Cir.1989). Citing Shupe v.

United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local No. 626 v. Kroger Co.

778 F.2d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 1985

BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. … The charge was subsequently denied by the Board. None of these issues is now before us. .

Sexton v. Barry

233 F.2d 220 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 18, 1956

Ritholz v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners in Optometry, D.C.N.C., 18 F.Supp. 409, 413 (three-judge court); Davega-City Radio v. Boland, D.C.N.Y., 23 F. Supp. 969, 970 (three-judge court); Hall v. … North Carolina State Board, D.C.M.D.N.C., 18 F.Supp. 409, 413 . Here the plaintiff has presented to the state court the same questions as to the jurisdiction of the state Board that it wishes this court to decide.

Gwendolyn T. Graham-Humphreys, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

209 F.3d 552 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 2000

Accord, Johnson v. United States Postal Service, 64 F.3d 233, 237-38 (6th Cir.1995); Johnson-Brown v. Wayne State University, 173 F.3d 855 (Table), 1999 WL 191322 (6th Cir. … Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 96 , 111 S.Ct. 453 , 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990); Andrews v. Orr, 851 F.2d 146, 151 (6th Cir.1988); Brown v. Mead Corp., 646 F.2d 1163, 1165 (6th Cir.1981).

Hellebush v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

65 F.2d 902 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1933

Hellebush to review the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (24 B. T. … S. v. Phellis, 257 U. S. 156 , 42 S. Ct. 63 , 66 L. Ed. 180 ; Board v. Comm’r, 51 F.(2d) 73, 75 (C. C.

Amer Family Prepaid v. Columbus Bar Assn

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 2007

See, e.g., Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill (1985) 470 U.S. 532, 105 S. … Family Prepaid Legal Corp. v. Columbus Bar Ass’n Page 6 Rights Comm’n v. Dayton Christian Sch., 477 U.S. 619, 627 (1986)). UPL 02-10 and UPL 05-02 are currently pending before the UPL Board.

Swastika Oil & Gas Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.

123 F.2d 382 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1941

United States v. Safety Car Heating Co., supra, 297 U.S. 93 , 56 S.Ct. 353 , 80 L.Ed. 500 ; North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U.S. 417, 424 , 52 S.Ct. 613 , 76 L.Ed. 1197 ; Board v. … The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Miltimore Sales Inc v. Intl Rectifier Inc

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 23, 2005

In support of its argument, Miltimore Sales, Inc. points to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4 and this Court’s decision in Brown v. … In Brown, the losing party, Local 58, filed a Rule 59(e) motion following the entry of judgment. Brown, 76 F.3d at 765.