Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

0.82s

  • Graham v. Snyder

    68 F. App'x 589 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 18, 2003

    The administrative remedy available to a federal prisoner challenging an adverse parole decision is to file an appeal with the National Appeals Board under 28 C.F.R. § 2.26 . Urbina v. … The National Appeals Board affirmed the Commission’s decision. Graham challenged the decision in an earlier § 2241 petition. The district court denied the petition, Graham appealed, and this court affirmed. Graham v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Arnold Frost v. Benefits Review Board

    821 F.2d 649 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 26, 1987

    Arnold FROST, Petitioner, v. BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, et al., Respondents. No. 85-4034. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 26, 1987. … See Couch v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Holly Lawson v. Kayla Creely

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 16, 2025

    Finally, she seeks to hold the Board responsible pursuant to Monell v. … The Board Is Not Liable Under Monell To establish the Board’s municipal liability under Monell, Lawson must show both “the deprivation of a constitutional right” and that the Board “is responsible for that violation

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Otto Cerni Cabinet Shop, Inc.

    979 F.2d 851 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 1992

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. OTTO CERNI CABINET SHOP, INC., Respondent. No. 92-6277. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 13, 1992. … , the Board, on May 8, 1992, issued its Decision and Order fixing the amount of backpay due the discriminatee and having thereafter applied to this Court for summary entry of a supplemental judgment specifying the amount

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Billy Don Dunlap v. State of Tennessee

    514 F.2d 130 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 17, 1975

    The board met and agreed with Colonel Akin’s decision. … Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93 , 73 S.Ct. 534, 540 , 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953). Cf. Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733 , 94 S.Ct. 2547 , 41 L.Ed.2d 439 (1974); Mindes v. Seaman, 453 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1971); Gianatasio v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Tennessee v. Dunlap, 426 U.S. 312 (1976)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Commissioner v. Vandeveer

    114 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 1940

    We think the Company’s prospects may properly have been considered by the Board to outweigh other factors in determining the value of its stock. Behles v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 87 F.2d 228, 230 ; Couzens v. … See Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 342 , 40 S.Ct. 155 , 64 L.Ed. 297 . The judgment of Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • William Ashford v. Univ. of Mich.

    89 F.4th 960 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 9, 2024

    He did not receive any follow-up from the Board of Regents. Id. at 171–72 (Page ID #351–52). … Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 436, 444 (6th Cir. 2016).

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • William Brown Burch v. William R. Story, Warden

    805 F.2d 1033 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 7, 1986

    William Brown BURCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William R. STORY, Warden, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 86-5383. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Oct. 7, 1986. … His various arguments concerning this issue are all controlled by this Court's decision in Adams v. Keller, 736 F.2d 320, 324 (6th Cir.1984) (en banc).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Freeman

    86 F. App'x 35 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 2003

    See, e.g., McKelvey v. … See United States v. Valentine, 63 F.3d 459, 462 (6th Cir.1995); see also United States v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Odle v. Decatur County, Tennessee

    421 F.3d 386 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 26, 2005

    a final Board decision. … Board of Airport Comm'rs v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 574 , 107 S.Ct. 2568 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987); City Council of Los Angeles v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Jorge Oxlaj-Perez v. Todd Blanche

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 29, 2026

    For example, we have held that equitable tolling applies to the 90-day deadline to file motions to reopen Board proceedings. Sarkisov v. … Petitions for review of Board decisions often raise humanitarian claims. For example, petitioners may seek relief against deportation because they would likely be tortured in their home country, e.g., Kamar v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • David T. Brown v. Arnold Jago Wayne Price

    798 F.2d 1413 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 9, 1986

    BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arnold JAGO; Wayne Price, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-3402. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 9, 1986. … Peake v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Realty Inv. Co. v. Moore

    104 F.2d 716 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 1939

    See Ladd v. Ladd, 8 How. 10, 27 , 12 L.Ed. 967 . Moreover, this was the exact meaning given to it by the board itself. … United States v. Guinzburg, 2 Cir., 278 F. 363 ; Plant v. Walsh, D.C., 280 F. 722 ; West Bay City Sugar Co. v. United States, D.C., 22 F.Supp. 844 ; McLaren v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Xin Kong Ni v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    54 F. App'x 212 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 27, 2002

    See Perkovic v. INS, 33 F.3d at 620-21 . … In support of its position, the Board cited the Ninth Circuit decision in Chan v. Reno, 113 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir.1997).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wolverine Fabricating & Mfg. Co. v. Detroit Gasket & Mfg. Co.

    148 F.2d 399 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 10, 1945

    Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co., 6 Cir., 106 F.2d 605 , cert. denied, 309 U.S. 657 , 60 S.Ct. 471 , 84 L.Ed. 1006 ; Western Auto Supply Co. v. American-National Co. 6 Cir., 114 F.2d 711 . … There was no invention in substituting one material, vulcanized fiber, for another material chip board, fiber board or Bakelite, or in substituting Thiokol for natural rubber. Timken Detroit Axle Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • P.I. & I. Motor Express, Inc. v. RLI Ins. Co.

    40 F.4th 398 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 6, 2022

    Brown v. Ind. Ins. Co., 184 S.W.3d 528, 534–35 (Ky. 2005) (collecting cases). RLI identifies four Ohio cases that it suggests follow this rule. See Crum & Forster Indem. Co. v. … Co. of Am., Inc. v. Mandrill Corp., 243 F. App’x 961, 967 (6th Cir. 2007) (opinion of Kennedy, J.); Brown, 184 S.W.3d at 537–38.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jamal Ali

    437 F. App'x 439 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 6, 2011

    The officer then asked Brown if he could check his person. Brown agreed and cooperated by leaning up in his seat and opening up his jacket. … The officer found drugs concealed between layers of clothing and arrested Brown, who was led off the bus by another officer. Id.

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • Dyer v. Bowlen

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 30, 2006

    In Miller v. … See Lopez v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Roberson

    249 F.3d 539 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 4, 2001

    Brown, and was later amended to add James W. … The trial court granted directed verdicts to Defendants Brown and Rayner.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bobby J. Brown v. Reynolds and Reynolds Co.

    798 F.2d 1413 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 28, 1986

    BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-3004. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 28, 1986. Before KENNEDY, WELLFORD and BOGGS, Circuit Judges. … Continental Casualty Co. v. DLH Services, Inc., 752 F.2d 353, 356 (8th Cir.1985); United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.