Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

1.17s

  • Leslie Ward v. Eric Holder, Jr.

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 15, 2013

    Where, as here, the Board adopts the Immigration Judge’s reasoning, but adds its own comments, we review both the Immigration Judge’s decision and the Board’s additional remarks. Karimijanaki v. … Holder, 579 F.3d 710, 714 (6th Cir. 2009) (citing Gilaj v. Gonzales, 408 F.3d 275, 282–83 (6th Cir. 2005)). We review de novo the Board’s conclusions of law. Marku v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Curtis Tate v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation

    821 F.2d 650 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 23, 1987

    Curtis TATE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BROWN AND WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-1824 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 23, 1987. … See Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • McInerney v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    82 F.2d 665 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 9, 1936

    Ahles Realty Corp. v. Commissioner, 71 F.(2d) 150, 151 (C.C.A.2); West Texas Refining & Development Co. v. Commissioner, 68 F.(2d) v7 (C.C.A.10); Shoenberg v. Commissioner, 77 F.(2d) 446, 448 (C.C.A.8). … Burnet, Commissioner, v. Leininger, 285 U.S. 136 , 52 S.Ct. 345 , 76 L.Ed. 665 ; Lucas, Commissioner, v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111 , 50 S.Ct. 241 , 74 L.Ed. 731 ; Wood v. Commissioner, 74 F.(2d) 78 (C.C.A.6).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Calhoun v. Frisco Railroad

    64 F. App'x 420 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 28, 2003

    See Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir.2000); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir.1997). A complaint “is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. … Hicks v. Hines, Inc., 826 F.2d 1543, 1544 (6th Cir.1987).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Kelly Richards

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 9, 2026

    And they had seen him point guns at them, pistol-whip his dog, break a board over that dog, and slap L.W. on the head. Despite their fear, L.W. and No. 24-3952 United States v. … United States v. Brown, 498 F.3d 523, 530 (6th Cir. 2007). But see United States v. Gardner, 488 F.3d 700, 719 (6th Cir. 2007) (finding a nine- month delay insufficient).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chattanooga Mailers' Union, Local No. 92 v. The Chattanooga News-Free Press Company

    524 F.2d 1305 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 29, 1975

    Groves & Sons Co. v. … In NLRB v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Joan Bacashihua, American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service, 859 F.2d 402 (1988)Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Ramirez-Canales v. Mukasey

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 2008

    The Supreme Court has held that Chevron deference to the Board’s interpretation of immigration statutes is appropriate. See INS v. … See United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 227 (2001). We therefore review the Board’s interpretation for reasonableness. See Chevron, 467 U.S. at 845.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morris Coal Co. v. Commissioner

    48 F.2d 810 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 1931

    Passing the question of our jurisdiction to review the board upon this subject [Enameled Co. v. Com’r (C. C. A. 3) 42 F.(2d) 213 —certiorari granted, 51 S. Ct. 89 , 75 L. … The order of the board is affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • James R. Barnes v. United States Army, Board of Corrections

    863 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 18, 1988

    BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ARMY, BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-3451. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. … Attached to this motion was a letter from the Army's Board for Correction of Military Records stating that "you have exhausted your remedy within the Department of the Army" and that the only remaining recourse was to file

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Terrell v. United States

    564 F.3d 442 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 26, 2009

    OfficeMax, Inc. v. United States, 428 F.3d 583, 596 (6th Cir.2005) (citing Brown, 513 U.S. at 121 , 115 S.Ct. 552 ). … OfficeMax, 428 F.3d at 596 (quoting Brown, 513 U.S. at 121 , 115 S.Ct. 552 ).

    Cited 152 timesPublished
  • Ebco Manufacturing Co. v. Secretary of Commerce

    221 F.2d 902 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 4, 1955

    War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 281 , 192 F.2d 405 ; Armstrong v. … War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, and Warner v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Litco, Division of R.V.L. Corporation

    2 F.3d 1151 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 1993

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LITCO, DIVISION OF R.V.L. CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 93-5907. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. … Any questions concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Board's Office. 28 Region 9, National Labor Relations Board, 3003 John Weld Peck Federal Building, 550 Main Street, Cincinnati,

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Joseph F. Hogan v. Wilbur C. Wright, D/B/A Wright Construction Company

    356 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1966

    Foster v. Young, 172 Cal. 317 , 156 P. 476 ; Corthell v. Summit Thread Co., 132 Me. 94 , 167 A. 79 , 92 A.L.R. 1391 ; Pillois v. Billingsley, 179 F.2d 205 (C.A.2, 1949); Millar v. … Ullman v. May, supra.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Huntington Nat. Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    90 F.2d 876 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 1937

    This contention was not presented to the Board except by petition to reopen on the merits, the granting of which, it has been repeatedly held, rests within the sound discretion of the Board. Bankers’ Coal Co. v. … United States v. Mroch, 88 F.(2d) 888 (C.C.A.6). Whether, if the point had been timely raised before the Board, the doctrine of Stone v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Inmates of Orient Correctional Institute v. Ohio State Adult Parole Authority

    929 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 26, 1991

    Id. at 7 , 99 S.Ct. at 2104 (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)) (emphasis supplied). … Thus in Jago v.

    Cited 134 timesPublished
  • Kemmons Wilson, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration

    882 F.2d 1041 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 1989

    As the First Circuit observed in a similar case in which the Civil Aeronautics Board, in a conclusory fashion, dismissed without a hearing an airline’s claim of discrimination, Trailways of New England, Inc. v. … proceedings by the Board....

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Dixie Fuel Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

    700 F.3d 878 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 28, 2012

    Gray v. SLC Coal Co., 176 F.3d 382, 389 (6th Cir. 1999); see also Island Creek Coal Co. v. … For these reasons, we vacate the decision of the Board and remand with instructions for the Board to remand this case to an ALJ for further consideration.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Morton H. Franklin

    608 F.2d 241 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 6, 1979

    Before KEITH, Circuit Judge, PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge, and BROWN, District Judge. * HARRY PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. 1 Morton H. … See United States v. Giordano, supra; Logsdon v. United States, supra.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,631 Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. M.C. McCoy

    995 F.2d 649 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 14, 1993

    The Board scheduled a hearing on the claims for February 11, 1992. … Roney, 981 F.2d at 898 (quoting PaineWebber, Inc. v. Hartmann, 921 F.2d 507, 513 (3d Cir.1990)).

    Cited 40 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.