Case law

Smith v. Local No. 25 Iron Workers' Pension Plan

99 F. App'x 695 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 26, 2004

. § 1001 et seq., in federal district court against the Plan, its Board of Trustees (the “Board”), and certain Plan personnel. The district court dismissed Smith’s claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. … Weiner v. Klais & Co., 108 F.3d 86, 90 (6th Cir.1997) (quoting Miller v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 925 F.2d 979, 986 (6th Cir.1991)).

Carmen Miranda De Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

996 F.2d 804 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1993

V. A. … Berman v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Rockwell International Corp.

619 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 10, 1980

NLRB v. … Carey v. Westinghouse Corp., 375 U.S. 261 , 84 S.Ct. 401 , 11 L.Ed.2d 320 (1964); NLRB v. Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers, supra; New Orleans Typographical Union No. 17 v. NLRB, 368 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1966).

Amir Al-Dabagh v. Case Western Reserve Univ.

777 F.3d 355 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 28, 2015

See Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd., 614 N.E.2d 748 (Ohio 1993) (affirming a medical board’s decision to suspend a doctor after he had sex with an emotionally vulnerable patient). … Halpern v. Wake Forest Univ. Health Scis., 669 F.3d 454, 463 (4th Cir. 2012). Refusing to approve a Ph.D. thesis because its acknowledgement section was unprofessional is “academic,” says another. Brown v.

Caldwell v. McNutt

158 F. App'x 739 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 10, 2006

Harbin-Bey v. Rutter, 420 F.3d 571, 575 (6th Cir. 2005). … Michigan law, which imbues the Parole Board with broad discretion, does not create a liberty interest in the granting of parole. Sweeton v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1164-65 (6th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, CIO v. Hinz

218 F.2d 664 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 1, 1955

Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Union, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed. 228 , the National Labor Relations Board has exclusive jurisdiction. In a later decision, United Construction Workers v. … To the same effect is Bethlehem Steel Company v. New York State Labor Relations Board, 330 U.S. 767 , 67 S.Ct. 1026 , 91 L.Ed. 1234 . Cf. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., v.

Consolidated Television Cable Service, Incorporated v. City of Frankfort, Kentucky

465 F.2d 1190 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 2, 1972

Nelson v. State Highway Board, 110 Vt. 44 , 1 A.2d 689 , 118 A.L.R. 915 ; Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Butler, 105 F.2d 732 (8th Cir.1939). … The complaint avers that Community since 1967 has been under the control of the Plant Board and is an agency of the Plant Board'.

Multi-Flow Dispensers of Toledo, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

340 F. App'x 275 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 4, 2009

v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 (1947)). In fact, the scope of this Court’s review of the Board’s unit determination is “exceedingly narrow,” NLRB v. Am. … “Thus, the burden of proof on parties seeking to have a Board-supervised election set aside is a ‘heavy one.’” Kux Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 890 F.2d 804, 808 (6th Cir. 1989) (quoting Harlan #4 Coal Co. v.

Sami K. Berri Tina Orham Berri v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

468 F.3d 390 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 16, 2006

race or group.’ ” Denko v. … In Denko v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Leslie Seals

942 F.2d 986 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 23, 1991

See Trent Coal, Inc. v. Day, 739 F.2d 116, 118 (3d Cir.1984). (“The regulation must be construed so as to conform to the statute. … .”); Daugherty v. Director, OWCP, U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 897 F.2d 740, 743 (4th Cir.1990).

Kimethu v. Lynch

634 F. App'x 583 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 25, 2016

The Board affirmed in a reasoned opinion. This petition followed. … Ferrans v. Holder, 612 F.3d 528, 531 (6th Cir.2010).

Maria Madrigal v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 9, 2009

. § 1252(a)(1) to review Board orders denying motions to reopen removal proceedings, see, e.g., Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 303 (5th Cir. 2005); Patel v. … No. 08-3132 Madrigal v. Holder Page 6 C. Propriety of the Board’s Withdrawal Order We review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo.

Argo-Collier Truck Lines Corporation v. United States

611 F.2d 149 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 13, 1979

Before CELEBREZZE, BROWN and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. CORNELIA G. … Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Co. v. United States, 545 F.2d 1046, 1047 (6th Cir. 1976). 2 Review Board Number 2 of the ICC initially denied Watkins' application.

Ragon Cunningham v. Island Creek Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

144 F.3d 388 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 5, 1998

Dockins v. … See Lukman v.

Clark Engineering and Construction Company v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Four Rivers District Council

510 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 17, 1975

In Gateway Coal Co. v. … Co. v.

Akhtar v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 29, 2005

To the extent that the Board adopts the reasoning of the IJ, this court reviews the IJ’s decision rather than the Board’s decision. See Denko v. INS, 351 F.3d 717, 726 (6th Cir. 2003). … Akhtar now petitions this court to review the Board’s denial of this latter motion. Although we review a decision of the Board to deny a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, Sinistaj v.

Meijer, Inc. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 21, 2006

The Board’s construction of the Act is permissible where it does not “exceed the reach” of the Act and “the Board has adequately explicated the basis of its interpretation.” NLRB v. J. … Meijer objects to the Board’s construction of the Act. It contends that Nos. 05-1951/2025 Meijer, Inc. v.

Camaj v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

78 F. App'x 465 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 10, 2003

We must defer to the Board’s interpretation if it is reasonable. See Chevron U.S.A, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837, 843-45 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984). … See Giday v. INS, 113 F.3d 230, 233 (D.C.Cir.1997); Tedeeva v. INS, 88 F.3d 826, 827 (9th Cir.1996).

Wise v. Ohio Department of Education (94-4101)

80 F.3d 177 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 4, 1996

Defendants, the Ohio Department of Education, Lorain County Board of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, and Avon Local Board of Education, appeal the District Court’s order awarding summary judgment to two … See Rettig v. Kent City Sch. Dist., 720 F.2d 463, 466-67 (6th Cir.1983).

Whitson v. Union Boiler Co.

47 F. App'x 757 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 2, 2002

Whitson testified that the job required walking on two-foot-wide boards fourteen stories in the air without life lines and without a safety net. … See Still v.