Case law

Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. Cleveland Trinidad Pav. Co.

62 F.2d 85 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 1932

The Board of Tax Appeals held that the latter course was the proper one, and the-Commissioner brings the present proceeding to review. In Commissioner v. R. J. … The decision of the Board is, accordingly, affirmed.

Plain Dealer Publishing Co., Cross-Appellee v. City of Lakewood, Cross-Appellant

794 F.2d 1139 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 10, 1986

of Review (“the Board”). … The Chairman of the Architectural Board admitted at trial that the Board had no standards for approving or disapproving the design of newsracks.

United States v. Harold Dean McKenzie

446 F.2d 949 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 10, 1971

United States v. Averell, 296 F.Supp. 1004 (E.D.N.Y.1969); United States v. Matellian, 31 F.R.D. 233 (D. Mass.1962). … See United States v. Haskins, 345 F.2d 111 (6th Cir. 1965); United States v. Gross, 137 F.Supp. 244 (S.D.N.Y.1956); United States v.

Buck Creek Coal Company v. Gay Sexton

706 F.3d 756 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 11, 2013

The ALJ awarded benefits and the Benefits Review Board affirmed. … The Board affirmed the award of benefits as to Mr. Sexton’s claim and affirmed in part and vacated No. 11-4304 Buck Creek Coal, et al. v. Sexton, et al.

Colvin v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

838 F.2d 192 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 4, 1988

Accordingly, we decline to remand and affirm the decision of the Board which we find to be supported by substantial evidence. I. The starting point for the dispute in this case is the Board’s decision in Pyle v. … the Board overruled Pyle in Hunter v.

Michelle Oliver, Etc. v. School District of the City of Kalamazoo, County of Kalamazoo

448 F.2d 635 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 30, 1971

The injunction of the District Judge directs the Kalamazoo Board of Education to implement immediately the school attendance plan adopted by the Board on May 7, 1971, and to make this plan completely and fully effective at … Bradley v. Milliken, 433 F.2d 897, 904 (6th Cir. 1970). This principle applies to an order granting a preliminary injunction as well as to an order denying a preliminary injunction. Deckert v.

Wooten v. Logan

92 F. App'x 143 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 14, 2004

In Turner v. … Wooten cites Brown v.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bradley

56 F.2d 728 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 8, 1932

The Commissioner seeks to review such decision of the Board here. … Second National Bank of Saginaw v. United States (Ct. Cl.) 42 F.(2d) 344 ; 21 Ruling Case Law, 70; 48 Corpus Juris, 618.

United States v. Jimmie Durrell Washington

392 F.2d 37 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 26, 1968

The Court observed in Witmer v. … In United States v.

Amir Al-Dabagh v. Case Western Reserve Univ.

777 F.3d 355 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 28, 2015

See Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd., 614 N.E.2d 748 (Ohio 1993) (affirming a medical board’s decision to suspend a doctor after he had sex with an emotionally vulnerable patient). … Halpern v. Wake Forest Univ. Health Scis., 669 F.3d 454, 463 (4th Cir. 2012). Refusing to approve a Ph.D. thesis because its acknowledgement section was unprofessional is “academic,” says another. Brown v.

Johnston-Taylor v. Gannon

907 F.2d 1577 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 1990

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). … Roth, 408 U.S. at 576 , 92 S.Ct. at 2701 , citing Slochower v. Board of Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956).

Gwyn R. Hartman Revocable Living Trust U/A/D 11/16/93 v. Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc.

780 F.3d 724 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 13, 2015

In Bourne v. Sanford, 41 N.W.2d 515 (Mich. 1950), the directors tried to convene a board meeting to dissolve a company without letting its only shareholder know. … Horbal v. St.

Hickok Oil Corp. v. Commissioner

120 F.2d 133 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 5, 1941

It is true that in Nachod & United States Signal Co. v. Helvering, 6 Cir., 74 F.2d 164 , in reliance upon what we assumed to be the rationale of Sinclair Refining Co. v. … Our conclusion in the Nachod case has been thought unsound in the Second Circuit, Guggenheim v. Helvering, 117 F.2d 469 , and the Supreme Court, in Dayton Power & Light Co. v.

United States v. Le' Ardrus Burris

912 F.3d 386 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 3, 2019

State v. Brown , 119 Ohio St.3d 447 , 895 N.E.2d 149 , 150-51 (2008). But we are aware of no Ohio Supreme Court cases that purport to limit Ohio's statutory definition of "serious physical harm" to only physical harms. … Hicks v.

Starkman v. Marathon Oil Co.

772 F.2d 231 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 13, 1985

See, e.g., Sunray v. DX Oil Co. v. … Greenfield v.

United States v. Jose Pacheco

841 F.3d 384 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 28, 2016

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 741 (1983). … United States v. Szymkowiak, 727 F.2d 95, 98 (6th Cir. 1984) (citing Brown, 460 U.S. at 745 (Powell, J., concurring)).

NLRB v. Bannum, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 23, 2024

The Board also argues that we should “impose a  Nos. 21-2664/2690 NLRB v. Bannum, Inc. et al. … Co. v.

Town & Country Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

352 F. App'x 20 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 9, 2009

Nos. 08-2242/2384 Town & Country Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. … It is logical for the Board to Nos. 08-2242/2384 Town & Country Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v.

Bobby A. Williams v. Robert Brown John Jabe

890 F.2d 417 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 29, 1989

WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN; John Jabe, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 88-2214, 89-1445. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 29, 1989. Before KEITH and BOGGS, Circuit Judges and JOHN W. … See Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police, 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2311 (1989). Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

United States v. Helen M. Lavalley Jacqueline Hudson John S. Ecclestone, II Peter C. Dougherty Luella C. Bassett Elizabeth Laforest and Kim Leith

957 F.2d 1309 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1992

Brown, 882 F.2d 1068, 1071 (6th Cir.1989), and since we hold that the court's factual findings were not erroneous, we reject appellants’ contention that the bar letters were improperly admitted. V. … Greer v.