Case law

Elizabeth K. Nobles v. Robert Brown, Jr., Director, Michigan Department of Corrections

980 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 9, 1992

NOBLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr., Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-1409. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 9, 1992.

Baker v. Board of Educ. of Clay County, Ky.

78 F.3d 584 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 6, 1996

Donnie Lee BAKER; Ruth Baker, Coadministrators of the Estate of Donald Scott Baker, Deceased; Donnie Lee Baker, Individually; Ruth Baker, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CLAY COUNTY, KENTUCKY; W.J. Watkins; Leewood Cornett; James Gibson, Jr.; Charles D.

Mary Patrick Latham v. The Office of the Attorney General of the State of Ohio

395 F.3d 261 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 10, 2005

The next month, Brown was replaced as head of the Consumer Protection Section by Helen MacMurray. … Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62, 91 , 120 S.Ct. 631 , 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000), held that Congress, when enacting the ADEA, did not abrogate States’ sovereign immunity.

Fisher v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

108 F.2d 707 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 15, 1939

Taylor Oil & Gas Co. v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 47 F. *709 2d 108; Hellebush v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 65 F.2d 902 ; First Nat. Bank of Greeley, Colo. v. United States, 10 Cir., 86 F.2d 938 . … Helvering v. Winston Bros. Co., supra; C. H. Mead Coal Co. v. Commissioner, 4 Cir., 72 F.2d 22 .

Gund's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

113 F.2d 61 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1940

As was stated by the Board of Tax Appeals in Craig v. … Bank v.

Commissioner v. Marshman

279 F.2d 27 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 31, 1960

The Board considered this difference an immaterial one and approved and followed the Board’s prior ruling in L. W. Mesta, supra, 42 B.T.A. 933 . … United States v. Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo Navigation Co., 338 U.S. 396, 402-407 , 70 S.Ct. 217 , 94 L.Ed. 195 ; Heiner v. Crosby, 3 Cir., 24 F.2d 191, 193 ; Champlin v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 71 F.2d 23, 29 .

Abulay Nian v. Warden

994 F.3d 746 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 19, 2021

Brown v. Romanowski, 845 F.3d 703, 711 (6th Cir. 2017) (quoting Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 99- 100 (2011)). … Respondent contends that Doan is not good law and cites to two subsequent decisions, Brown v. Bradshaw and Hoffner v. Bradshaw.

S. S. Kresge Company, K-Mart Division v. National Labor Relations Board, and Retail Store Employees Union, Local 36, Rcia, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. F & G Merchandising, Inc., Cunningham Drug Stores, Inc., Holly Stores, Inc., Miles Shoes, Dunham's Garden City, Inc., Schiller Co., and Levitt Co., and Retail Store Employees Union, Local 36, Rcia, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Acme Quality Paints, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Retail Store Employees Union, Local 36, Rcia, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

416 F.2d 1225 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 15, 1969

KRESGE COMPANY, K-Mart Division, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Retail Store Employees Union, Local 36, RCIA, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Accord, Gallenkamp Stores Co. v. N.L.R.B., supra ; S. D. Warren Co. v.

Taylor v. Barns

55 F. App'x 746 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 11, 2003

Knuckles El v. Toombs, 215 F.3d 640, 642 (6th Cir.2000); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 . … Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 645 (6th Cir.1999); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

Mark Thompson v. Quorum Health Resources, LLC

485 F. App'x 783 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 22, 2012

“Board”). … Brown testified about the nature of Thompson’s fraud allegations and further opined that the Board was adequately informed of changes to the management agreement.

Giraldo v. Holder

654 F.3d 609 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 2011

An “order of [removal]” becomes “final” upon “a determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming such order,” or upon “the expiration of the period in No. 09-4445 Giraldo, et al. v. … The Board order sustaining the INS appeal from the granting of asylum is likewise final. As “an order issued by the Board,” it was “final as of the date of the Board's decision.” Id.

Merritt v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

613 F.3d 609 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 22, 2010

Brown v. Raymond Corp., 432 F.3d 640, 647 (6th Cir.2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). B. … Brown v. Raymond Corp., 432 F.3d 640, 647 (6th Cir.2005) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Commissioner v. Goulder

123 F.2d 686 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 2, 1941

Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 557 , 61 S.Ct. 719 , 85 L.Ed. 1037 ; Helvering v. Richter, 312 U.S. 561, 562 , 61 S.Ct. 723 , 85 L.Ed. 1043 ; Commissioner v. Central National Bank, 6 Cir., 119 F.2d 470 . … General Utilities & Operating Co., etc., v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200, 207 , 56 S.Ct. 185 , 80 L.Ed. 154 ; Hormel v. Helvering, supra; Helvering v. Richter, supra.

Marsh v. Board of Educ. of City of Flint

762 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 4, 1985

STUART MARSH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. … Jackson Board of Educ., 746 F.2d 1152 (6th Cir. 1984). 7 In addition, plaintiff's contention that the least restrictive means be used in remedying past discrimination is erroneous. See Fullilove v.

Austin L. Evans v. Cleveland State University Board of Trustees

934 F.2d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 1991

EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-3759. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 3, 1991. … Murray v.

Shkulaku-Purballori v. Mukasey

514 F.3d 499 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 19, 2007

In Almuhtaseb v. … In Soe v.

Harnischfeger Corporation v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Afl-Cio, and Sheet Metal Workers Union, Local No. 94, Afl-Cio

436 F.2d 351 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 21, 1970

Union v. Morton, supra, at 260 , 84 S.Ct. at 1258-1259 ; see Ritchie v. United Mine Workers, 410 F.2d 827, 836 (6th Cir. 1969). … In NLRB v.

Myrtle Clark v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

838 F.2d 197 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 5, 1988

The Benefits Review Board affirmed the AU as to the abandonment issue, but reversed the award of benefits on the basis of a regulation ( 20 C.F.R. § 725.309 (c)) not cited by either party. *199 CLARK v. … There is no need for us to ask the Benefits Review Board to make its own review of the evidence, because the Board must apply the same standard of review that we apply. *201 Gibas v.

Jamal Thomas v. George Stephenson

898 F.3d 693 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 6, 2018

See Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191, 204 (6th Cir. 2009). We give two layers of deference to state-court convictions. … See Brown, 567 F.3d at 205; see also Schriro v.

Taylor v. Principi

92 F. App'x 274 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 11, 2004

See Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. Espy, 39 F.3d 1339, 1355 (6th Cir. 1994). … See Bogle v. Sullivan, 998 F.2d 342, 347 (6th Cir.1993). The board’s decision was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion. In addition, the board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.