Case law

T. Marzetti Co. v. Roskam Baking Co.

680 F.3d 629 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 25, 2012

Downey, FROST BROWN TODD LLC, Columbus, Ohio, Matthew C. Blickensderfer, FROST BROWN TODD LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Matthew J. Gipson, Steven L. Underwood, Jason L. … Browne Drug Co. v. Cococare Products, Inc., 538 F.3d 185, 192 (3d Cir. 2008). However, Sixth Circuit precedent does not require rigid adherence to the primary significance test.

Richard L. Tingler, Jr. v. Ronald Marshall

716 F.2d 1109 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 15, 1983

We adhere to our previous statements in Brown v. Stickler, 422 F.2d 1000 (6th Cir.1970) and Martin v. … See Brown v. Strickler, 422 F.2d 1000 (6th Cir. 1970).

Observer & Eccentric Newspapers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

136 F. App'x 720 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 25, 2005

As with the Board’s factual findings, we review the Board’s application of law to facts under the substantial evidence standard. Holly Farms Corp. v. NLRB, 517 U.S. 392, 398-99 (1996); NLRB v. … See V&S ProGalv, Inc. v.

George Corey, Trust Fund v. New York Stock Exchange

691 F.2d 1205 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 2, 1982

Tamari v. Conrad, 552 F.2d 778, 780 (7th Cir. 1977) (Chicago Board of Trade arbitrators); Cahn, supra, (labor arbitrator). See E.C. Ernst, Inc. v. … Ohio 1980) (labor arbitrators); Raitport v. Provident National Bank, 451 F.Supp. 522, 527 (E.D.Pa.1978) (Joint Board of Trade); Merchants Despatch Transportation Corp. v.

United States v. Heman H. McGuire

347 F.2d 99 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 11, 1965

The Board met periodically, voting at such meetings upon the payment of invoices submitted by the Board’s vendors. It is in connection with the payment of bills rendered to the Board that defendant’s offenses occurred. … McKenna v. United States, 232 F.2d 431, 436-437 (C. A.8th 1956); United States v.

Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Warren

841 F.2d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 30, 1987

Ratliff v. Benefits Review Board, 816 F.2d 1121, 1123 (6th Cir.1987). … In 1983, when the employer would have been required to file its brief with the Benefits Review Board, the Board had reaffirmed its position in Kuhar v.

Roane Cty. Emer. Commc'ns v. BellSouth

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 24, 2017

Brown, 328 S.W.3d at 853. … Brown, 328 S.W.3d at 855.

Mercantile Nat. Bank v. Hubbard

105 F. 809 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 1900

Cummings v. Bank, 101 U. S. 153 , 25 L. Ed. 903 ; Grether v. Wright, 23 C. C. A. 498 , 75 Fed. 742 . The statute gives the board no jurisdiction to increase the assessment without notice. … Justice White in City of New Orleans v.

Vasquez Salazar v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 31, 2008

The Board abuses its discretion when it acts “arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law.” Id. at 532; Alizoti v. Gonzales, 477 F.3d 448, 451 (6th Cir. 2007). … See Anssari- Gharachedaghy v. INS, 246 F.3d 512, 514 (6th Cir. 2000); Malak v. Gonzales, 419 F.3d 533, 534 (6th Cir. 2005).

Kaelin v. Grubbs

682 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 9, 1982

On April 17,1979, the Walton-Verona Board of Education (“Board”) held a hearing concerning Michael’s behavior. The Board did not convene or consult the AARC before or during this hearing. … In Goss v.

Monroe Body Co. v. Herzog

298 F. 423 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 1924

the finger upon the board. … Keyser v. Farr, 105 U. S. 265 , 26 L. Ed. 1025 ; Foster, Fed. Prac. (6th Ed.) § 709.

Baird v. NHP Mill Creek Apartments

94 F. App'x 328 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 9, 2004

Whitmore v. … As stated in Bertrand v.

United States v. Marcus Henderson

2 F.4th 593 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 25, 2021

As we explain below, acting to affect the outcome of a review board proceeding fits within the Supreme Court’s explanation of a  No. 20-3707 United States v. … Here, by contrast, the prosecution correctly identified the relevant question as whether a disciplinary board would punish the inmate. ]  No. 20-3707 United States v.

Johnson v. Kosmos Portland Cement Co.

64 F.2d 193 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1933

An explosion occurred, killing every one on board, including Wilberding, for whose estate appellant Johnson is administrator, and Sauer, for whose estate appellant Rose Sauer, his widow, is executrix. … A. 9]), drought (Anderson v. M., St. P. & S. S. Ry., 146 Minn. 430 , 179 N. W. 45 ), lightning (Brown v. West Riverside Coal Co., 143 Iowa, 662 , 120 N. W. 732 , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1260), flood (Vyse v. C., B. & I. Ry.

Mark Thompson v. Quorum Health Resources, LLC

485 F. App'x 783 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 22, 2012

“Board”). … Brown testified about the nature of Thompson’s fraud allegations and further opined that the Board was adequately informed of changes to the management agreement.

Health Care and Retirement Corporation of America, D/B/A Glenside Nursing Center, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

255 F.3d 276 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 3, 2000

Co. v. NLRB, 890 F.2d 804, 808 (6th Cir. 1989). Moreover, "it is the Board's function to resolve questions of fact and credibility when there is a conflict in the testimony." NLRB v. … It is the Board's function to resolve questions of fact and credibility when there is a conflict in the testimony. See Adair Standish Corp. v. NLRB, 912 F.2d 854, 860 (6th Cir. 1990); NLRB v.

Stark Electric R. v. McGinty Contracting Co.

238 F. 657 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 9, 1917

E. 227 ; Board of Education v. Berry, 62 W. Va. 433, 442 , 59 S. E. 169 , 125 Am. St. Rep. 975 . Stiles v. Coal Co., 47 W. Va. 838, 847 , 35 S. E. 986 , is not, in our opinion, an authority to the contrary. … Memphis Trust Co. v. Brown-Ketchum Iron Works (C. C. A. 6) 166 Fed. 398 , 93 C. C. A. 162 ; Second National Bank v. Pan-Amer. Bridge Co. (C. C. A. 6) 183 Fed. 391 , 105 C. C.

Carthage Tobacco Works v. Barlow-Moore Tobacco Co.

5 F.2d 469 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 1925

Columbia Mill Co. v. Alcorn, 150 U. S. 460, 463 , 14 S. Ct. 151 , 37 L. Ed. 1144 ; Rouss, Inc., v. Winchester Co. (C. C. A.) 300 F. 706, 711 , and cases there cited. … Schlitz Brewing Company v. Houston Ice Co., 250 U. S. 28, 30 , 39 S. Ct. 401 , 63 L. Ed. 822 .

Grinter v. Knight

532 F.3d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 19, 2008

See Sweeton v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1165 (6th Cir.1994) (holding that due process does not require that parole authorities follow established procedure). … Dismas Charities, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 401 F.3d 666, 677 (6th Cir.2005). 8 . Jones v. Bock overruled Brown v.

Grainger v. Douglas Park Jockey Club

148 F. 513 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 27, 1906

Co. v. Bristol, 151 U. S. 567 , 14 Sup. Ct. 437, 38 L. Ed. 269 ; Davis v. Massachusetts, 167 U. S. 43 , 17 Sup. Ct. 731, 42 L. Ed. 71 ; Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183 , 20 Sup. Ct. 633, 44 L. Ed. 725 ; L’Hote v. … of Yick Wo v.