Case law

James Phillips v. McCollom

788 F.3d 650 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 2015

Phillips v. … See Butler v. Elle, 281 F.3d 1014, 1023 (9th Cir. 2002). The argument at any rate would fail even if the board did have authority over criminal prosecutions.

Rieth-Riley Construction Co. v. Operating Engineers Local 324

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 2026

Garmon rested in large part on respecting the Board’s primacy over resolving labor-law disputes. Under Loper Bright Enterprises v. … The labor-law question must be one that the Board has not yet resolved; if the Board has already spoken on the subject, Garmon’s Board-first rationale falls away.

Kuhnle Brothers, Inc. v. County of Geauga

103 F.3d 516 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 1997

Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989 (6th Cir.1989). In reaching this decision, the Browning court considered Ohio Rev. Code §§ 2305.10 & .11, but did not discuss § 2305.09(D). … Since Browning , several Ohio courts of appeals have rejected Browning and applied § 2305.09(D)’s four-year statute of limitations to § 1983 actions.'

Stevens Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Local 17 Iron Workers Pension Fund

877 F.3d 663 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 13, 2017

The Board of Trustees of the Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund oversees and administers the Fund. The Fund is severely underfunded, with a deficit of over $170 million. … See Mohamad v. Palestinian Auth., 566 U.S. 449, 458 (2012).

Cogar v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

44 F.2d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 10, 1930

The Board of Tax Appeals sustained the commissioner and petitioner seeks review. The hoard followed Weiss v. Wiener, 279 U. S. 333 , 49 S. Ct. 337 , 73 L. Ed. 720 . … However this may be, none of the evidence before the Board of Tax Appeals is returned with the record and we cannot therefore review the question. U. S. v. Copper Queen Min. Co., 185 U. S. 495, 497 , 22 S.

Charles Edward Brown, Sr. v. Michael O'dea, Warden

977 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 8, 1992

Charles Edward BROWN, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael O'DEA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-5340. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Oct. 8, 1992. … Capps v.

Davis v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

81 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 10, 1936

Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U.S. 716 , 49 S.Ct. 499 , 73 L.Ed. 918 ; Noel v. Parrott, 15 F.(2d) 669 (C.C.A.4); Bass v. Hawley, 62 F.(2d) 721 (C.C.A.5); Levey v. … The orders of the Board of Tax Appeals are affirmed.

McKemy v. Supreme Lodge A. O. U. W.

180 F. 961 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 1910

St. 1901, p. 696); United States v. Buford, 3 Pet. 10, 12 , 7 L. Ed. 585 ; Smith v. Vaughan, 10 Pet. 366 , 9 L. Ed. 457 ; Jackson v. Ashton, 10 Pet. 480 , 9 L. Ed. 502 ; Chapman v. Barney, 129 U. S., at page 681, 9 Sup. … That equity has jurisdiction of such a case is *969 clear. 1 Bacon on Benefit Societies, § 39; Burke v. Roper, 79 Ala. 138 ; Colley v. Wilson, 86 Mo. App. 396 ; Blair v.

Gjokic v. Ashcroft

104 F. App'x 501 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 2004

Petitioners first challenge the Board’s summary-affirmance procedure, arguing that it violates due process for a single Board member summarily to affirm an immigration judge’s opinion. Our recent decision in Denko v. … Denko holds that the Board’s summary-affirmance procedure does not violate due process. Id. at 729-30 (citing cases); see, e.g., Blanco de Bel-bruno v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 272 , 280-83 (4th Cir.2004); Zhang v.

Patricia MacIntosh v. Ron Clous

69 F.4th 309 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 31, 2023

Wilson, however, determined that a board did not violate the First Amendment by censuring its own member for criticizing and suing the board. … In Wilson, the Court held that a board of elected officials’ censure of a board member did not count as an adverse action for purposes of a retaliation claim. 142 S. Ct. at 1261.

Haycraft v. Hollenbach

606 F.2d 128 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1979

Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 706 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 (1974); Huecker v. Milburn, 538 F.2d 1241 , 1245 n. 9 (6th Cir. 1976); Bell v. … See also Clark v. Board of Education, 369 F.2d 661, 671 (8th Cir. 1966). AFFIRMED. .

Ba v. Holder

561 F.3d 604 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 2009

He subsequently denied her motion to reopen, a decision affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”). … Dec. 665, 673 (BIA 2008) (citing Silva-Carvalho Lopes v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 156 (2d Cir.2008); Santana Gonzalez v. Att’y Gen. of the United States, 506 F.3d 274 (3d Cir.2007); Sembiring v.

Cohen v. United States

294 F. 488 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1923

Browne v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 290 Fed. 870, 872 . … The applicable rule has been fully stated by this court in Browne v. U. S., supra, 290 Fed. at pages 873 and 874, and by our earlier decisions there cited. See, also, Zucker v. U. S. (C. C. A. 3) 288 Fed. 12, 14, 17 .

Dunn v. Retail Clerks International Association

307 F.2d 285 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 22, 1962

National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, 18, 19 , 63 S.Ct. 394 , 87 L.Ed. 579 ; Retail Store Employees Union Local 954, etc. v. Rothman, 298 F.2d 330 , 332, C.A.D.C.; Hourihan v. … National Labor Relations Board v.

John C. Singleton v. Lewis B. Stevens, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Milan, Michigan, United States Board of Parole

306 F.2d 513 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 22, 1962

Fleming v. Tate, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 156 F.2d 848 (1946); Hurley v. Reed, supra; Robbins v. Reed, supra; Moore v. Reid, supra; Barnes v. Reed, 301 F.2d 516 (C.A.D.C., 1962). … Because of various court decisions, the United States Parole Board now provides by rule that: “All federal prisoners who have been returned to custody as parole or mandatory release violators under a Board war- *514 rant

United States v. Raymond Leon Jackson

408 F.2d 1000 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 24, 1969

Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114, 122 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946) ; United States v. Beatty, 350 F.2d 287 (6th Cir. 1965). … Estep v. United States, supra; United States v. Beatty, supra. Furthermore, the procedures employed accorded appellant due process in all respects, and the Board’s order to report for civilian work was therefore valid.

Michael Kitchen v. Gretchen Whitmer

106 F.4th 525 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 28, 2024

” and the “board could deny parole.” … To order the Parole Board to consider him now rewrites that sentence.11 This sort of adjustment lies in the province of habeas, not § 1983. V.

Harmount v. Commissioner

58 F.2d 118 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 3, 1932

Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co., 275 U. S. 243 , 48 S. Ct. 63 , 72 L. Ed. 262 ; Wadsworth Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 44 F.(2d) 762 (C. C. A. 6). … Burnet v. Houston, 283 U. S. 223 , 51 S. Ct. 413 , 75 L. Ed. 991 . The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 465, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,497 Hanson Bratton v. City of Detroit, and Guardians of Michigan, Intervening

704 F.2d 878 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 1983

Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed. 666 (1979). … As in Fullilove , this program is acceptable under any of the “formulas of analysis articulated in such cases as University of California Board of Regents v.

Rhoden v. Campbell

153 F.3d 773 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 1998

Scola v. Beaulieu Wielsbeke, N.V., 131 F.3d 1073, 1075 (1st Cir.1997); Hope v. United States, 43 F.3d 1140, 1143-44 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1132 , 115 S.Ct. 2558 , 132 L.Ed.2d 812 (1995); Pinion v. … Bisby, 869 F.2d 1070, 1072-73 (7th Cir.1989). 4 Counsel for the appellant relies on this court's decision of Birrell v. Brown.