Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.04s
563 F.2d 311 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 13, 1977
Reference is made to the decision and order of the Board, reported at 219 N.L.R.B. No. 19, for a recitation of pertinent facts. … The court concludes that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFederal Ins. Co. v. Detroit Fire & Marine Ins.
202 F. 648 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 1913
Brown v. Merchants’ Marine Ins. Co., 152 Fed. 411, 413 , 81 C. C. A. 553 . True, the case of The Livingstone, 130 Fed. 746 , 65 C. C. … But we think the reversal was not intended to affect the principle announced in the decision below and approved by Judge Gilbert in Brown v. Merchants’ Marine Ins. Co., supra.
Cited 15 timesPublishedClay Sims v. R. W. Alvis, Warden
242 F.2d 506 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 1957
Hawk v. Olson, 1945, 326 U.S. 271, 276 , 66 S.Ct. 116 , 90 L.Ed. 61 ; Brown v. Allen, 1953, 344 U.S. 443, 475 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 . … Brown v. Allen, 1953, 344 U.S. 443, 448, 486 , 73 S.Ct. 397 ; Cranor v. Gonzales, 9 Cir., 1955, 226 F.2d 83, 94 .
Cited 4 timesPublished107 F.2d 883 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 1939
But this does violence to the findings of the Board upon facts which reasonably support them. See Dulin v. Com’r, 6 Cir., 70 F.2d 828 . … Unless the evidence shows that the findings of the Board to the contrary were clearly erroneous (Tracy v. Com’r, 6 Cir., 53 F.2d 575 ; Marshall v. Com’r, 6 Cir., 57 F.2d 633 ) we are bound by its decision.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States v. William Bela Binder, No
313 F.2d 243 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 31, 1963
The Statute authorizes the Board to impose certain terms and conditions upon the parole of a prisoner. It is a matter within the discretion of the Board. “Court action is not made a part of it.” Hiatt v. … Gould v. Green, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 363 , 141 F.2d 533, 534 ; Clark v. Stevens, 291 F.2d 388 , C.A.6th.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMcKemy v. Supreme Lodge A. O. U. W.
180 F. 961 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 1910
St. 1901, p. 696); United States v. Buford, 3 Pet. 10, 12 , 7 L. Ed. 585 ; Smith v. Vaughan, 10 Pet. 366 , 9 L. Ed. 457 ; Jackson v. Ashton, 10 Pet. 480 , 9 L. Ed. 502 ; Chapman v. Barney, 129 U. S., at page 681, 9 Sup. … That equity has jurisdiction of such a case is *969 clear. 1 Bacon on Benefit Societies, § 39; Burke v. Roper, 79 Ala. 138 ; Colley v. Wilson, 86 Mo. App. 396 ; Blair v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedObserver & Eccentric Newspapers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
136 F. App'x 720 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 25, 2005
As with the Board’s factual findings, we review the Board’s application of law to facts under the substantial evidence standard. Holly Farms Corp. v. NLRB, 517 U.S. 392, 398-99 (1996); NLRB v. … See V&S ProGalv, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedGraphicana Corporation v. Baia Corporation
472 F.2d 1202 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 30, 1973
Corp. v. F. E. Myers & Bro. Co., 384 F.2d 4, 10 (6th Cir. 1967); Brown v. Ford Motor Co., 57 F.Supp. 825, 827 (E.D.Mich.1944). … Smith v. General Foundry Machine Co., 174 F.2d 147 (4th Cir), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 869 , 70 S.Ct. 144 , 94 L.Ed. 533 (1949); Villani v. Industrial Shoe Machinery Corp., 210 F.Supp. 298 (D.C.Mass.1962); Brown v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHerbick v. Salem City School District Board of Education
151 F. App'x 463 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 25, 2005
v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). The district court granted summary judgment to the Board because Herbick failed to prove the fourth element of the prima facie case. … The district court properly granted summary judgment to the Board on this claim. V.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAlexander Leon Banks v. Rockwell International North American Aircraft Operations
855 F.2d 324 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 1988
See also Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). 2 In the instant case, the EEOC mailed appellant’s notice of right to sue on September 7, 1983. … Cook , however, relied on Brown v. Mead Corp., 646 F.2d 1163, 1165 (6th Cir.1981), decided prior to Zipes , which stated that Title VII filing requirements are jurisdictional.
Cited 68 timesPublishedSam Williams v. Dwight Browman Grant Harris Daniel Barnes
981 F.2d 901 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 1992
See Brown v. Waters, 959 F.2d 233 2104, (6th Cir.1992) (unpublished per curiam). … Pro se petitioner Brown’s complaint contained the following handwritten language: [Signature of Plaintiff Brown] I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements in My complaint herein from page 1 through
Cited 214 timesPublishedUnited States v. Masonry Contractors Ass'n
497 F.2d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1974
United States v. … This Court’s statements in Head v.
Cited 15 timesPublished704 F.2d 878 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 1983
Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed. 666 (1979). … As in Fullilove , this program is acceptable under any of the “formulas of analysis articulated in such cases as University of California Board of Regents v.
Modified by Bratton v. City of Detroit, 712 F.2d 222 (1983)Cited 66 timesPublishedChun Ok Song v. City of Elyria
985 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 4, 1993
Elyria Ordinance No. 91-22 prohibits massagists who are not licensed by the state medical board from massaging persons of the opposite gender (“cross-massaging”). … United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 442 , 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1711-12 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965). The ban on bills of attainder limits the role of the legislature to formulating general rules.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUniversity of Cincinnati v. Heckler
733 F.2d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 14, 1984
See, e.g., Loma Linda University v. Schweiker, 705 F.2d 1123, 1126 (9th Cir.1983); Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Inc. v. Schweiker, 698 F.2d 336, 340 (8th Cir.1983); Chesire Hospital v. N.H.-V.T. … In Northwest Hospital, Inc. v.
Cited 15 timesPublished532 F.2d 1083 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1976
Welch, 327 U.S. at 554 , 66 S.Ct. at 718 , 90 L.Ed.2d at 849; Brown v. United States, 263 U.S. 78, 81 , 44 S.Ct. 92, 101 , 68 L.Ed. 171, 180 (1923); Agee, 372 F.2d at 143; United States v. … Certain Real Estate Lying on the South Side of Board Street, 217 F.2d 920 , 924 (6th Cir. 1954); Starr v.
Cited 0 timesPublished260 F.2d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 10, 1958
As held in Hicks v. … Rudulph v. State, 16 Ga.App. 353 , 85 S.E. 365 . Where a municipal board took no action upon a claim against the county, it was held to be a refusal to allow it. Board of Supervisors of Jefferson County v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedAmerican Rolling Mill Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
41 F.2d 314 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1930
A. 1246; Hibbard, etc., v. Commissioner, 5 B. T. A. 464; Superior Co. v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. A. 380; and Indiana, etc., R. R. Co. v. Commissioner, 16 B. T. A. 279. In Corning Glass Works v. Lucas, Commissioner (App. … Russell, 46 Kan. 382 , 26 P. 715 ; Roberts v. Mays Mills, 184 N. C. 406 , 114 S. E. 530 , 28 A. L. R. 338; Temple St. Cable Ry. v. Hellman, 103 Cal. 634 , 37 P. 530 ; Steinway v. Steinway & Sons, 17 Misc.
Cited 14 timesPublishedMcCarthy v. Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corp.
466 F.3d 399 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 17, 2006
Lancaster, Maria V. … Brentwood Academy v. Tenn. Secondary Sch. Athletic Ass’n, 442 F.3d 410, 440 (6th Cir. 2006) (alteration in original) (quoting Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 352 (1943)).
Cited 46 timesPublishedGottfried v. Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local Union No. 80
876 F.2d 1245 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 18, 1989
P 11,325 Bernard GOTTFRIED, Regional Director of the Seventh Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … As we said in Gottfried v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna