Case law

Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Trautwein

111 F.2d 923 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 10, 1940

Ry. v. Bolle, 284 U.S. 74, 78 , 52 S.Ct. 59 , 76 L.Ed. 173 , and that the District Court had jurisdiction. We do not deem it nec- • essary to undertake a differentiation of the decided cases on this particular subject. … end thereof to tilt the board and pull it under the girder.

Creighton E. Miller, Administrator of the Estates of Juvenal J. Rezendes, Deceased (99-3703), Louie E. Hudson, Deceased (99-3705), Booker T. Pompey, Deceased (99-3707), Walter L. Bowman, Deceased (99-3708), William B. Birch, Jr. (99-3709) v. American Heavy Lift Shipping

231 F.3d 242 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 3, 2000

v. … Note: 1 For example, in Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 323 U.S. 574 (1945), the amendment added a new claim arising out of a single accident that led to the death of a railroad employee. In Brown v.

Creek Coal Co. v. Bates

134 F.3d 734 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 31, 1997

Lindh v. Murphy, — U.S.-,-, 117 S.Ct. 2059, 2062 , 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997) (citing and quoting Landgraf v. … Landgraf 511 U.S. at 257 & n. 10, 114 S.Ct. at 1493 & n. 10 (citing Schwabenbauer v. Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Olean, 667 F.2d 305 , 310 n. 7 (2d *738 Cir.1981); Condit v.

Townsend v. Vasbinder

365 F. App'x 657 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 18, 2010

United States v. City of Detroit, 401 F.3d 448, 450-51 (6th Cir.2005) (quoting McPherson v. Mich. High Sch. Athletic Ass’n, 119 F.3d 453, 458 (6th Cir.1997) (en banc)). This case is analogous to Demis v. … In Thompson v.

Keene v. Zelman

337 F. App'x 553 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 29, 2009

Defendants Ohio Board of Education and Susan Zelman, Ohio Board of Education Superintendent and Director, appeal a district court order granting plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees under the fee-shifting provision of the … Deja Vu v. Metro.

Alhaj v. Holder

576 F.3d 533 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 10, 2009

When, as in this case, the Board issues its own separate opinion after reviewing the decision of an immigration judge, the appellate court treats that Board ruling as the final agency determination. See Morgan v. … “Under this deferential standard, we may not reverse the Board’s determination simply because we would have decided the matter differently.” Koliada v.

Calvin L. Baird, Sr. v. United States Department of Agriculture

39 F.3d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 10, 1994

In Thornton v. … See Stamper v.

Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 3, 2003

See United States v. made); United States v. … Sagan v. United States, 342 F.3d No. 01-5215 Smith v. United States 13 493, 501 (6th Cir. 2003) (citations omitted). See also Brown v. Crowley, 312 F.3d 782, 791-92 (6th Cir. 2002).

Dulin v. Commissioner

70 F.2d 828 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 10, 1934

Duiin, then the Board’s decision upon that issue is conclusive. Tracy v. Commissioner, 53 F.(2d) 575 (C. C. A. 6); Commissioner v. Isaac Winkler & Bros. Co., 53 F.(2d) 580 (C. C. … Grissom v. Sternberger, supra; Owen v. Commissioner, supra; Smith v. Commissioner, supra; Johnston v. Laflin, 103 U. S. 800 , 26 L. Ed. 532 ; 12 R. C. L. 942.

Canada Coal Co. v. Stiltner

866 F.2d 153 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 13, 1989

Director, OWCP v. Reed, No. 86-990 (Ben. Rev. Bd. June 11, 1987) (per curiam). The Board reasoned that the AU’s orders were invalid because they lacked judicial finality. … For example, in FTC v.

St. Luke's Hospital Association of Cleveland, Ohio, of the Methodist Church, a Non-Profit Corporation v. United States

333 F.2d 157 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 18, 1964

Doctor’s Hospital v. Board of Tax Appeals, 173 Ohio St. 283 , 181 N.E.2d 702 (1962). … Brown & Bartlett v. United States, 330 F.2d 692 (C.A. 6 1964); Lietz v. Flemming, 264 F.2d 311 (C.A. 6 1959).

Patrick Baker v. Iron Workers Local 25

999 F.3d 394 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 2021

Believing the board would soon change the plan to resolve these two uncertainties, he certified the return.  No. 20-1946 Baker, et al. v. Iron Workers Local 25, et al. … No. 20-1946 Baker, et al. v. Iron Workers Local 25, et al. Page 4 The trust agreement meets these requirements. It has a six-member board.

Barbara Jean Berry v. School District of the City of Benton Harbor, William G. Milliken, Governor of the State of Michigan

698 F.2d 813 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 24, 1983

Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406 , 97 S.Ct. 2766 , 53 L.Ed.2d 851 (1977); Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979) and Dayton Board of Education v. … Penick v. Columbus Board of Education, 583 F.2d 787 (6th Cir.1978), aff’d, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2982 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979); Brinkman v. Gilligan, 583 F.2d 243 , aff’d, Dayton Board of Education v.

Peabody Coal Company v. Greer

62 F.3d 801 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 16, 1995

This Court has plenary authority to review the Board's legal conclusions. Gibas v. … Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v.

United States v. Lawrence Flack

941 F.3d 238 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 23, 2019

See United States v. Brown, 879 F.3d 1231, 1235–40 (11th Cir. 2018); Muhammad, 478 F.3d at 250 n.2; Williamson v. United States, 265 F.2d 236, 239 (5th Cir. 1959). … Crim P. 35(a); Brown, 879 F.3d at 1236; United States v. Palmer, 854 F.3d 39, 48 (D.C. Cir. 2017).

Ohio Manufacturers' Association v. City Of Akron

801 F.2d 824 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 31, 1986

Inc. v. … Healthy Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 280 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 572 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). Moreover, in Mt.

Anestis Ex Rel. Estate of Anestis v. United States

749 F.3d 520 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 18, 2014

Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 970 (6th Cir. 1997); see also Veterans for Common Sense v. … In Beamon v. Brown, this court held that Section 511 precludes district court review of a claim challenging the manner in which the Department of Veterans Affairs processes claims for veterans’ benefits.

V & M STAR STEEL v. Centimark Corp.

678 F.3d 459 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 25, 2012

Testing done for Centimark by PSI showed that, if one board was removed from a bundle, the panels No. 10-3584 V&M Star Steel v. Centimark Corp. … Even if the missing boards could have been removed from the bundle only by intentional force, as Centimark argues, a jury question remains as to whether it is more probable that Centimark employees removed the boards and

Inmates' Councilmatic Voice, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. David Rogers, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees

541 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 9, 1976

In Hruska v. … See also Savage v. United States Parole Board, 422 F.2d 1248 (6th Cir. 1970).

American Fibre-Chamois Co. v. Buckskin-Fibre Co.

72 F. 508 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 10, 1896

Brown v. Piper, 91 U. S. 38 . … In Cochrane v. Deener, 94 U. S. 780 , which Mr. Justice Brown cites in Locomotive Works v.