Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

0.60s

  • Keith Vaughn Jennifer Vaughn v. Lawrenceburg Power System

    269 F.3d 703 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 19, 2001

    Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).” Rahn v. Drake Ctr., Inc., 31 F.3d 407, 412 (6th Cir.1994); see also Johnson v. … Chappel v. Montgomery County Fire Prot. Dist. No. 1, 131 F.3d 564 , 575 (6th Cir.1997) (quoting Brown v. City of Trenton, 867 F.2d 318, 322 (6th Cir.1989)).

    Overruled — as noted by a later courtCited 106 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service

    872 F.2d 1027 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 1989

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner Cross-Respondent, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent Cross-Petitioner. Nos. 88-5734, 88-5812. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 27, 1989. … ORDER 1 The National Labor Relations Board (Board) has applied for enforcement of its decision finding an unfair labor practice. (No. 88-5734).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ziegler v. Michigan

    90 F. App'x 808 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 2004

    Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). … Coleman v. GMAC, 296 F.3d 443, 446 (6th Cir.2002). The magistrate judge properly noted that Ziegler had not exhausted administrative remedies on the issues on which he sought injunctive relief. Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Cumberland River Coal Company v. Billie Banks

    690 F.3d 477 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 8, 2012

    The Board also vacated the ALJ’s finding that “the existence No. 11-3500 Cumberland River Coal Co. v. Banks, et al. … This court has a “limited scope of review over the decisions of the Benefits Review Board and the ALJ.” Saginaw Mining Co. v. Ferda, 879 F.2d 198, 205 (6th Cir. 1989).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Dambrot v. Central Michigan University

    55 F.3d 1177 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 5, 1995

    Board of Educ. v. … Lane, 921 F.2d 677 (6th Cir.1991) (statements in dispute over office policy not matters of public concern but statements at public hearing regarding office policy were matters of public concern); Brown v.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Taylor Trust Ex Rel. Taylor v. Security Trust Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

    844 F.2d 337 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 12, 1988

    *339 BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, David L. Taylor III (Taylor) and the Andrew D. … FDIC v. Investors Assocs. X, Ltd., 775 F.2d 152 (6th Cir.1985); FSLIC v. Third National Bank, 173 F.2d 192 (6th Cir.1949).

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Thawatchai Foythong v. Eric Holder, Jr.

    743 F.3d 1051 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 2014

    The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed. No. 13-3914 Foythong v. Holder Page 3 In June 2013, Foythong asked the Board to reopen his case. … He may well have provided extensive evidence of the No. 13-3914 Foythong v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bill Fox Chevrolet, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    765 F.2d 144 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1985

    BILL FOX CHEVROLET, INC., PETITIONER, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT. … Upon due consideration thereof the Court finds that the findings and order of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 3 It is therefore ORDERED that the order of the Board in this case be

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. Trautwein

    111 F.2d 923 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 10, 1940

    Ry. v. Bolle, 284 U.S. 74, 78 , 52 S.Ct. 59 , 76 L.Ed. 173 , and that the District Court had jurisdiction. We do not deem it nec- • essary to undertake a differentiation of the decided cases on this particular subject. … end thereof to tilt the board and pull it under the girder.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Randy Haight v. LaDonna Thompson

    763 F.3d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 15, 2014

    See, e.g., Cubero v. Burton, 96 F.3d 1450 , 1450 (7th Cir.1996) (unpublished) (Wisconsin); Allen v. Toombs, 827 F.2d 563 , 565 n. 5 (9th Cir.1987) (Oregon); Brown v. … See Brown v. Entm’t Merchs. Ass’n, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2729, 274-41 , 180 L.Ed.2d 708 (2011).

    Cited 200 timesPublished
  • Bernie Hatfield v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    743 F.2d 1150 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 6, 1984

    See e.g., Haywood v. Secretary, 699 F.2d 277 , 283 and 285 (6th Cir.1983); Smith v. Califano, 682 F.2d 583, 587 (6th Cir.1982); Lawson v. Secretary, 688 F.2d 436, 438 (6th Cir.1982); Miniard v. … In Miniard v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Mullins Coal Co. of Va. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 484 U.S. 135 (1988)Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Keene v. Zelman

    337 F. App'x 553 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 29, 2009

    Defendants Ohio Board of Education and Susan Zelman, Ohio Board of Education Superintendent and Director, appeal a district court order granting plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees under the fee-shifting provision of the … Deja Vu v. Metro.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Calvin L. Baird, Sr. v. United States Department of Agriculture

    39 F.3d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 10, 1994

    In Thornton v. … See Stamper v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sanford v. Harvard Industries, Inc.

    262 F.3d 590 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 2001

    Yeager v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. … It relied on Sharkey v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dulin v. Commissioner

    70 F.2d 828 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 10, 1934

    Duiin, then the Board’s decision upon that issue is conclusive. Tracy v. Commissioner, 53 F.(2d) 575 (C. C. A. 6); Commissioner v. Isaac Winkler & Bros. Co., 53 F.(2d) 580 (C. C. … Grissom v. Sternberger, supra; Owen v. Commissioner, supra; Smith v. Commissioner, supra; Johnston v. Laflin, 103 U. S. 800 , 26 L. Ed. 532 ; 12 R. C. L. 942.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Canada Coal Co. v. Stiltner

    866 F.2d 153 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 13, 1989

    Director, OWCP v. Reed, No. 86-990 (Ben. Rev. Bd. June 11, 1987) (per curiam). The Board reasoned that the AU’s orders were invalid because they lacked judicial finality. … For example, in FTC v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Diego Pavia v. NCAA

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 1, 2025

    Brown v. Yost, 122 F.4th 597, 601 (6th Cir. 2024) (en banc) (per curiam) (quoting Church of Scientology of Cal. v. United States, 506 U.S. 9, 12 (1992)). … NCAA Division I Board of Directors Waiver Guidance for 2025-26 Eligibility Question and Answer Document, NCAA (July 18, 2025), https://perma.cc/4QFS-NU2W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • St. Luke's Hospital Association of Cleveland, Ohio, of the Methodist Church, a Non-Profit Corporation v. United States

    333 F.2d 157 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 18, 1964

    Doctor’s Hospital v. Board of Tax Appeals, 173 Ohio St. 283 , 181 N.E.2d 702 (1962). … Brown & Bartlett v. United States, 330 F.2d 692 (C.A. 6 1964); Lietz v. Flemming, 264 F.2d 311 (C.A. 6 1959).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Patrick Baker v. Iron Workers Local 25

    999 F.3d 394 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 2021

    Believing the board would soon change the plan to resolve these two uncertainties, he certified the return. No. 20-1946 Baker, et al. v. Iron Workers Local 25, et al. … No. 20-1946 Baker, et al. v. Iron Workers Local 25, et al. Page 4 The trust agreement meets these requirements. It has a six-member board.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Peabody Coal Company v. Greer

    62 F.3d 801 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 16, 1995

    This Court has plenary authority to review the Board's legal conclusions. Gibas v. … Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.