Case law

Williams v. Michigan Board of Dentistry

39 F. App'x 147 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 7, 2002

See generally Welch v. … . & Hosp. v.

Hill v. Franklin County Board of Education

390 F.2d 583 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 1968

In Hill v. County Board of Education of Franklin County, Tenn., 232 F.Supp. 671 , the judge found “a continuation of their [board of education] initially-announced policy of adamant obstinacy.” … Vaughan v. Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527 , 82 S.Ct. 997 , 8 L.Ed.2d 88 (1962); Bell v. School Board of Powhatan County, Virginia, 321 F.2d 494 (4th Cir. 1963); Rolax v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 186 F.2d 473 (4th Cir. 1951).

Doe v. Board Education Tullahoma City Schools

9 F.3d 455 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 5, 1993

of the handicapped announced in Board of Educ. v. … In Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 206 , 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3051 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982), the Supreme Court indicated that a complete de novo review is inappropriate.

Akron Board of Education and Conrad C. Ott v. State Board of Education of Ohio

490 F.2d 1285 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 15, 1974

The school board is attempting to obey and apply the federal law laid down by the Supreme Court in the Brown case and the defendants attempt and threaten to subvert and prevent it. … Swann v. Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 15 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (II), 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); Bradley v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Swift & Co.

127 F.2d 30 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 11, 1942

Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 312 U.S. 660 , 61 *31 S.Ct. 736, 85 L.Ed. 1108 , and National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance Mach. … Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 514 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 ; Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., Ltd., v.

Millard K. Brown v. United States

25 F.3d 1047 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 24, 1994

See United States v. Brown, No. 89-6281 (6th Cir. … See Lincecum v. Collins, 958 F.2d 1271, 1280-81 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 417 (1992); United States v. Snyder, 787 F.2d 1429, 1432-33 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 836 (1986); United States v.

Ruby Brown, Administratrix of the Estate of Marvin Brown v. United States

273 F.2d 433 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 1960

It is further concluded that the position of peril and danger in which Brown’s negligence placed him was not and could not have been discovered by George (postal *434 employee) in time to have avoided the collision.” … Jordan v. Clough, Ky., 313 S.W.2d 581 ; Johnson v. Morris, Adm’x., Ky., 282 S.W. 2d 835 ; Saddler v. Parham, Ky., 249 S. W.2d 945 ; Payne’s Adm’r v. Stone, 299 Ky. 704 , 187 S.W.2d 267 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Pinkerton's, Inc.

621 F.2d 1322 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1980

Conflicting inferences are for the Board to resolve. See 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v. … See Argus Optics v. NLRB, 515 F.2d 939, 945 (6th Cir. 1975). The Board or the Hearing Officer has the power to revoke a subpoena. See Herman Brothers Pet Supply, Inc. v.

Gerald Brown v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corporation, a Delaware Corp.

300 F.2d 280 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 19, 1962

Plaintiff-appellant, Gerald Brown, appeals from judgment for defendant-appellee, Addressograph-Multigraph Corporation, entered upon a jury verdict. … Dempsey v. Heise, 250 F.2d 852 (C.A.6, 1958); Hayes v. Coleman, 338 Mich. 371, 376 , 61 N.W.2d 634 ; Cook v. Vineyard, 291 Mich. 375, 382 , 289 N.W. 181 ; Hanna v. McClave, 273 Mich. 571, 573 , 263 N.W. 742 .

Yeiser v. United States Board & Paper Co.

107 F. 340 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 1901

by Browne and Stuart from the Leonard Paper-Box Board Company to the United States Board and Paper Company; and whereas, it is for the best interests of the company to further its business in purchasing the same; therefore … Browne, as president of the United States Board & Paper Company, gave that company’s check on the same hank to Browne and Stuart for $85,000.

Thomas H. Ellison v. Robert Brown

16 F.3d 1219 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 14, 1994

ELLISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-1511. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 14, 1994. Before: KEITH, NELSON and RYAN, Circuit Judges. … Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 221 (1982); Long v.

Zainalian v. Memphis Board of Education

3 F. App'x 429 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 5, 2001

See Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 605 (6th Cir.1993). … Hafford v. Seidner, 183 F.3d 506, 515 (6th Cir.1999).

National Labor Relations Board v. Baja's Place

733 F.2d 416 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 3, 1984

First, the Board’s determination that chief cook Brown was a supervisor is alleged as error. … Therefore, the Board’s findings as to these violations are supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld. NLRB v. Brown, 546 F.2d 690 (6th Cir.1976). See also, e.g., Charge Card Ass’n v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Galicks, Inc.

671 F.3d 602 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 2012

Page 6 statutory authority to exercise the Board’s delegated powers. New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 560 U.S. ___, 130 S. Ct. 2635, 2645 (2010). Consequently, we remanded the case to the Board. See Galicks, Inc. v. … Galicks must show that the Board’s story is unreasonable. Accord Island Creek Coal Co. v.

Brown J. Sharp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

689 F.2d 87 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 25, 1983

On January 11, 1972, petitioner-appellant, Brown J. Sharp, and Sarah R. Sharp were granted a divorce. … Deputy v. du Pont, 308 U.S. 488, 498 , 60 S.Ct. 363, 368 , 84 L.Ed. 416 (1940). Cf. Meilink v.

Kellogg Company v. National Labor Relations Board

457 F.2d 519 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 1972

This is a petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board 1 and a cross petition for enforcement of such order. The Board ordered reinstatement of two employees of the petitioner with back pay. … National Labor Relations Board v.

United States v. Board of Education

581 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 1978

reasons set out by District Judge Thomas in his Memorandum Opinion filed October 4, 1976, 435 F.Supp. 949 (1976) and for the reasons set out in the Opinion of the three judge District Court in the case of United States v.

John Moody v. Michigan Gaming Control Board

790 F.3d 669 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 2015

LLC v. Charter Twp. of W. Bloomfield, 691 F.3d 794, 798 (6th Cir. 2012). Qualified immunity involves a two-step inquiry. Brown v. … See, e.g., Feathers v. Aey, 319 F.3d 843, 848 (6th Cir. 2003). After Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009), we consider reasonableness during our evaluation of the two qualified-immunity factors. See Brown v.

Board of Commerce v. Security Trust Co.

225 F. 454 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 1915

Justice Brown said: ‘•When a negative is averred in pleading, or plaintiff's case depends upon tlie establishment oi! a negative, and the means oi proving the fact are equally within the control oi! … The Board, in its contract, was acting in a trust capacity.

National Labor Relations Board v. Erikson

273 F.2d 477 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 12, 1960

National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 596 , 61 S.Ct. 358 , 85 L.Ed. 368 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 6 Cir., 252 F.2d 428, 430 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Ford, 6 Cir., 170 F.2d 735, 739 . On Saturday, June 30, 1956 Mr.