Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

3.93s

  • Sanford v. Harvard Industries, Inc.

    262 F.3d 590 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 2001

    Yeager v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. … It relied on Sharkey v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Starcher v. Correctional Medical Systems, Inc.

    7 F. App'x 459 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 26, 2001

    Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 415 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … See United States v. Mays, 69 F.3d 116, 121 (6th Cir.1995) (disqualification of counsel); United States v. Iles, 906 F.2d 1122 , 1130 & n. 8 (6th Cir.1990) (withdrawal of counsel); Criss v.

    Cited 165 timesPublished
  • United States v. Charlie Lee Hart

    449 F.2d 340 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 20, 1971

    at all practicable, be residents of the area in which their local board has jurisdiction.” 1 Appellant urges that our opinion in United States v. … We did not, however, overrule United States v. Brooks, 415 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1969).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. All Type Masonry, Inc.

    996 F.2d 1216 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 24, 1993

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ALL TYPE MASONRY, INC., Respondent. No. 93-5652. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 24, 1993. … Any questions concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Board's Office, 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 300, Detroit, Michigan 48226-2569, Telephone 313-226-3219.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Anderson v. International Union, United Plant Guard Workers

    370 F.3d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 2004

    could have eliminated the § 501 problem by amending Brown-Graves Co. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest UPGWA’s constitution. We reject this argument. … See Meyers v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Mobile Home Estates, Inc.

    915 F.2d 1572 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 10, 1990

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MOBILE HOME ESTATES, INC., Respondent. No. 89-5265. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Oct. 10, 1990. … Take the following affirmative action which the Board has found necessary to effectuate the policies of the Act. 7 (a) Offer Alan C.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kizer v. SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT

    649 F.3d 462 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 17, 2011

    Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 (1985) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)). … They suggest that Lewis and the Board employed a “policy No. 10-5161 Kizer, et al. v. Shelby County Gov’t, et al.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Associated Builders & Contractors v. Michigan Department of Labor & Economic Growth

    543 F.3d 275 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 2008

    Wright, 364 U.S. 642, 647 , 81 S.Ct. 368 , 5 L.Ed.2d 349 (1961); Sweeton v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1166 (6th Cir.1994) (en banc). … Leaders Assoc. v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Richard F. Davet v. City of Cleveland, Robert Vilkas and City of Cleveland Department of Building & Housing

    456 F.3d 549 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 1, 2006

    VI, cl. 2; see Marshall v. … .”); Clark v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Olympic Plating Industries, Inc.

    33 F.3d 55 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 18, 1994

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. OLYMPIC PLATING INDUSTRIES, INC., Respondent. No. 94-5643. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 18, 1994. … JUDGMENT 1 This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for summary entry of a judgment against Respondent, Olympic Plating Industries, Inc., Canton, Ohio, its officers, agents, successors

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Brandon Fox v. Ronald Desoto, Louisville Regional Airport Authority

    489 F.3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 2007

    He boarded the airplane and had not yet been introduced to the captain and crew as is required by regulation, when he got into a verbal exchange with a female passenger and her flaneé. … City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 389 , 109 S.Ct. 1197 , 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989); Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 411 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

    Abrogated on other grounds by Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)Cited 304 timesPublished
  • Joseph J. Shavrnoch v. Clark Oil and Refining Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation

    726 F.2d 291 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 1, 1984

    See Over the Road Drivers, Inc. v. Transport Insurance Co., 637 F.2d 816, 821 (1st Cir.1980); Thi-Hawaii, Inc. v. First Commerce Financial Corp., 627 F.2d 991, 994 (9th Cir.1980); British Airways Board v. … See also Security Tire & Rubber Co. v. Gates Rubber Co., 598 F.2d at 964-67 ; Brown v. Hansen Publications, Inc., 556 F.2d 969, 971-72 (9th Cir.1977); Emil J. Lauter Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Janan v. Trammell

    785 F.2d 557 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 11, 1986

    Walker Process Equip., Inc. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 382 U.S. 172, 174-75 , 86 S.Ct. 347, 348-49 , 15 L.Ed.2d 247 (1965); Windsor v. … Jones v. Phyfer, 761 F.2d 642 (11th Cir.1985); Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84 (4th Cir.1983); Humann v. Wilson, 696 F.2d 783 (10th Cir.1983); Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616 (7th Cir.1982).

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Destiny Delivery Systems, Inc.

    892 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 18, 1989

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DESTINY DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC., Respondent. No. 89-5484. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 18, 1989. … GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges. 1 This Court having on June 20, 1985, entered its judgment enforcing in full the backpay provision of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, the Board, on December 30, 1988, issued its

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. John Davis Electrical, Inc.

    972 F.2d 347 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 13, 1992

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. JOHN DAVIS ELECTRICAL, INC., Respondent. No. 92-5702. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 13, 1992. 1 Before MILBURN and RALPH B. … Any questions concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Board's Office at 82 Iona, N.W., Grand Rapids, MI 49503. * The Honorable Julian A. Cook, Jr., U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cass County v. Gibson

    107 F. 363 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1901

    Society v. Faulkner, 91 U. S. 415 , 23 L. Ed. 283 ; Railroad Co. v. Varnell, 98 U. S. 479 , 25 L. Ed. 233 ; Railway Co. v. Jurey, 111 U. S. 584 , 4 Sup. Ct. 566, 28 L. Ed. 527 ; Newport News & M. Val. Co. v. … Reuting v. City of Titusville, 175 Pa. 512 , 34 Atl. 916 ; Kramrath v. City of Albany, 127 N. Y. 575 , 28 N. E. 400 ; Shea v. Milford, 145 Mass. 529 , 14 N. E. 764 ; Collins v. Holyoke, 146 Mass. 298 , 15 N.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service

    66 F.3d 326 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1995

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-6032. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Sept. 14, 1995. Before: CONTIE, NELSON, and RYAN, Circuit Judges. … JUDGMENT 1 This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") for the enforcement of a certain order on consent issued by it against the respondent, United States Postal Service

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Cromwell Plastering & Drywall, Inc.

    66 F.3d 326 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1995

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CROMWELL PLASTERING & DRYWALL, INC., Respondent. No. 95-5959. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Sept. 14, 1995. … The respondent did not file an answer to the complaint and has not made an appearance either before the Board or this court. Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Charter Township of West Bloomfield

    691 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 21, 2012

    Commc’ns v. City of Mequon, 352 F.3d 1147, 1148 (7th Cir. 2003)); MetroPCS, Inc. v. … That the Zoning Ordinance (Section 26-49 a.10) specifies that the Township Board found that the presence of numerous towers and pole No. 11-1568 T-Mobile Cent. v. Twp. of W.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Randy Haight v. LaDonna Thompson

    763 F.3d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 15, 2014

    See, e.g., Cubero v. Burton, 96 F.3d 1450 , 1450 (7th Cir.1996) (unpublished) (Wisconsin); Allen v. Toombs, 827 F.2d 563 , 565 n. 5 (9th Cir.1987) (Oregon); Brown v. … See Brown v. Entm’t Merchs. Ass’n, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2729, 274-41 , 180 L.Ed.2d 708 (2011).

    Cited 200 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.