Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Watson-Rummell Electric Company

818 F.2d 31 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 14, 1987

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. WATSON-RUMMELL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Respondent. No. 86-5247. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. May 14, 1987. … On 1 April 1987, the Court, being fully advised of the premises, handed down its opinion granting in part and denying in part enforcement of the Board's Order and remanding the case to the Board for additional proceedings

Yayeshwork Abay and Burhan Amare v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General and Immigration and Naturalization Service

368 F.3d 634 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 19, 2004

Mikhailevitch v. INS, 146 F.3d 384, 389 (6th Cir.1998); Perkovic v. INS, 33 F.3d 615, 620 (6th Cir.1994). … We may not reverse the Board’s determination simply because we would have decided the matter differently. See Klawitter v. INS, 970 F.2d 149, 151-52 (6th Cir.1992).

William C. Schaub, Jr. v. West Michigan Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

250 F.3d 962 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 21, 2001

(quoting Gottfried v. Frankel, 818 F.2d 485, 493 (6th Cir.1987)). Whether the Board’s legal theory is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo. Kobell, 965 F.2d at 1406-07 . … The district court, citing *971 Eisenberg v.

Midland Insurance v. Adam

781 F.2d 526 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1985

Rather, such proceedings ended when no appeal was filed with the Board following the AU’s decision on remand. Moreover, in Blevins v. … See also Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. Benefits Review Board, 535 F.2d 758 (3d Cir.1976).

STATE of Michigan, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellee

744 F.2d 32 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1984

Department of Health and Human Services, 708 F.2d 627 (11th Cir.1983); Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Departmental Grant Appeals Board, 698 F.2d 22 (1st Cir.1983); and State of New Jersey v. … Justice Powell in Schweiker v.

Shamrock Coal Co. v. Lee

751 F.2d 187 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 4, 1985

At oral argument, counsel for the Board stated that the Board has stopped using the “reasonable opportunity to be hired” test since Central Appalachian Coal Co. v. Fletcher, 679 F.2d 1086 (4th Cir.1982). … See Central Appalachian Coal Co. v.

Richard A. Sullivan v. River Valley School District, and Charles O. Williams, Superintendent, Individually and in His Official Capacity

197 F.3d 804 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 29, 1999

See also Kvintus v. R.L. … See Wathen v.

Sunfire Coal Company and Ashlo Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of America, R. P. Price, C. H. Kelly and Follace Fields, Partners, D/B/A Elkhorn Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of America

335 F.2d 958 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 20, 1964

The recitations of the facts in our decisions of Gilchrist v. United Mine Workers of America, 290 F.2d 36 (CA 6, 1960); Flame Coal Company v. … The record does not disclose how the affidavit went from its confidential and professional custody in the hands of attorney Noble to the Board of Commissioners of the City of Hazard.

Portage Silica Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

89 F.2d 958 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1937

Upon our consideration of the prior case it was our duty to accept the fact findings of the Board as conclusive [Phillips v. Com’r, 283 U.S. 589 , 600, 51 S.Ct. 608 , 612, 75 L.Ed. 1289 ; Tracy v. … of the last excepting clause of section 283 (b) of the act of 1926 ( 44 Stat. 63 ), petitioner had, until the decision of the Board, the right to pay the tax and sue for a refund (Old Colony Trust Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. National Building Associates, Inc.

972 F.2d 347 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 13, 1992

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL BUILDING ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent. No. 92-5892. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 13, 1992. 1 Before MILBURN and RALPH B. … the opportunity to perform work on weekends for cash without payment of fringe benefits, and actually paying Unit employees in this manner for weekend work, contrary to the wage and fringe benefit provisions of Article V

Kizer v. SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT

649 F.3d 462 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 17, 2011

Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 (1985) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)). … They suggest that Lewis and the Board employed a “policy No. 10-5161 Kizer, et al. v. Shelby County Gov’t, et al.

National Labor Relations Board v. Seminole Intermodal Transport, Inc.

94 F.3d 645 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 18, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SEMINOLE INTERMODAL TRANSPORT, INC., Respondent. No. 96-6304. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 18, 1996. Before: BROWN, JONES, and BOGGS, Circuit Judges. … ORDER 1 This cause is submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for summary entry of a judgment against Respondent, Seminole Intermodal Transport, Inc., its officers, agents, successors, and assigns

Gary L. Penick v. Columbus Education Association, Intervenor-Appellant

574 F.2d 889 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 27, 1978

Although the CEA cites some cases in which the interests of a school board and school teachers were clearly adverse, it has provided no specific example in briefs or oral argument to suggest that in this case the Board of … Penick v. Columbus Board of Education, 429 F.Supp. 229 (S.D.Ohio 1977).

Cornel Viorel Scorteanu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

339 F.3d 407 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 2003

See Dobrota v. … Moreover, the Board need not “list every possible positive and negative factor in its decision.” Rodriguez-Rivera v. INS, 993 F.2d 169, 170-71 (8th Cir.1993).

Nationwide Recovery, Inc. v. City of Detroit, Mich.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 2026

Beginning with the motion to strike, the court held that Parish’s statements about the probable conduct of the Board came from his “personal experience and knowledge.” Nationwide Recovery, Inc. v. … See Zinermon v.

Dambrot v. Central Michigan University

55 F.3d 1177 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 5, 1995

Board of Educ. v. … Lane, 921 F.2d 677 (6th Cir.1991) (statements in dispute over office policy not matters of public concern but statements at public hearing regarding office policy were matters of public concern); Brown v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School

597 F.3d 769 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 9, 2010

Called teachers are hired by the voting members of the Hosanna-Tabor church congregation upon the recommendation of the Board of Education, Board of Elders, and Board of Directors. … Hoeft notified Perich of the Board's decision on January 10, 2005. . See, e.g., Petruska v. Gannon Univ., 462 F.3d 294 , 302 (3d Cir.2006); Bryce v.

Warman v. Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co.

839 F.2d 257 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 9, 1988

839 F.2d 257 Henry WARMAN, Petitioner, v. … Welch v. Benefits Review Board, 808 F.2d 443, 445 (6th Cir.1986). If we remanded this case to the Board it would confront the identical facts now before this court.

United States v. James P. Fitch

964 F.2d 571 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 20, 1992

United States v. Pelletier, 898 F.2d 297, 301 (2nd Cir.1990). An agreement not to prosecute is contractual in nature, and subject to contract law standards. United States v. Brown, 801 F.2d 352, 354 (8th Cir.1986). … Brown, 801 F.2d at 355 .

National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service

19 F.3d 19 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 7, 1994

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-6546. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 7, 1994. … Before: MILBURN and SILER, Circuit Judges; and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. 1 The National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") applies to this court for summary entry of a judgment enforcing its October 6, 1993, decision