Case law

Brown v. Brown

929 F.2d 700 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 1991

Carson Lynn BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr.; Raymond G. Toombs; Craig Hutchinson, M.D.; Donald Mason; Raymond Palmer; Dan Bolden; Marjorie Vanochten; Frank Williams; Peter Vidor; Z. … During the course of the appeal, Brown was moved from Ionia to the state prison in Marquette, Michigan.

Mason v. Mitchell

543 F.3d 766 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 3, 2008

In Mason v. … In Williams v.

Brown v. Brown

920 F.2d 932 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 12, 1990

Carson Lynn BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr., Raymond G. Toombs, Craig Hutchinson, M.D., Donald Mason, Raymond Palmer, Dan Bolden, Marjorie Vanochten, Frank Williams, Peter Vidor, Z. … See Brown v. Brown, No. 89-60010 (E.D.Mich. filed Jan. 13, 1969), appeal dismissed, No. 89-2408 (6th Cir. June 8, 1990).

Brown v. Michigan Department of Corrections

41 F. App'x 831 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 2002

Brown ordered the transcript but did not make arrangements to pay for it, or move for a free transcript. Therefore, the court is unable to resolve any issues that would require reference to the transcript. Alizadeh v. … Safeway Stores, Inc., 910 F.2d 234, 237 (5th Cir.1990); Turnbull v. Wilcken, 893 F.2d 256, 258 (10th Cir.1990).

Vaughn MacHinery Company v. Renegotiation Board

273 F.2d 235 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 31, 1959

Following a unilateral determination of the Renegotiation Board that the petitioner received excess profits in the amount of $200,000.00 for the taxable year 1952, petitioner sought a redeter-mination thereof by the Tax Court

Alexander v. Youngstown Board of Education

675 F.2d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 9, 1982

Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, supra, at 458 , 99 S.Ct. at 2946 . … Board of Education v. State, 45 Ohio St. 555 , 16 N.E. 373 (1888). .

Patricia BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEAD CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

646 F.2d 1163 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 13, 1981

Fox v. … Thus, even if the notice were facially valid, as was the first notice issued to appellant Brown, a defendant could compel inquiry into the action of the agency.

Brown Insulating System Inc. v. Secretary of Labor

629 F.2d 428 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 1980

*429 ORDER Appellant, Brown Insulating Systems, Inc., seeks a review of a decision by the Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission (OSHRC) finding serious and willful violations by appellant of the standards regulating

Vincent Moore v. Mike Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 19, 2022

Brown As we previously explained, the limitations period under § 2244(d)(1)(A) expired on September 17, 2015. Moore v. Brown, No. 21-1514 (6th Cir. Jan. 13, 2022) (order). … United States v. White, 874 F.3d 490, 495 (6th Cir. 2017). -9- No. 21-1514, Moore v. Brown been different.

Morrison v. National Labor Relations Board

772 F.2d 283 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 18, 1985

The Board’s decision and order are reported at 272 NLRB No. 59 (1984). … This court reviews the findings of the Board under the standard of substantial evidence and is required to uphold findings of fact made by the Board if so supported.

Hill v. Franklin County Board of Education

390 F.2d 583 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 1968

In Hill v. County Board of Education of Franklin County, Tenn., 232 F.Supp. 671 , the judge found “a continuation of their [board of education] initially-announced policy of adamant obstinacy.” … Vaughan v. Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527 , 82 S.Ct. 997 , 8 L.Ed.2d 88 (1962); Bell v. School Board of Powhatan County, Virginia, 321 F.2d 494 (4th Cir. 1963); Rolax v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 186 F.2d 473 (4th Cir. 1951).

Akron Board of Education and Conrad C. Ott v. State Board of Education of Ohio

490 F.2d 1285 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 15, 1974

The school board is attempting to obey and apply the federal law laid down by the Supreme Court in the Brown case and the defendants attempt and threaten to subvert and prevent it. … Swann v. Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 15 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (II), 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); Bradley v.

Wheeling Traction Co. v. Board of Com'rs

248 F. 205 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1918

Justice Brown held ( 167 U. S. 94 , 17 Sup. Ct. 748, 42 L. … In Reading v.

Goss v. Board of Education of Knoxville

301 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 1962

v. … It was further ordered that the board should put the plan as approved into effect. On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court decided, in Brown v.

Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

22 F. App'x 562 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 2001

Garcia v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 46 F.3d 552, 555 (6th Cir. 1995). Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla of evidence but less than a preponderance, Bell v. Comm’r of Soc. … Buxton v. Halter, 246 F.3d 762, 772 (6th Cir.2001). If supported by substantial evidence, the Commissioner’s decision must be affirmed, even if the reviewing court would decide the case differently, Felisky v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Wells

283 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 4, 1960

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for summary entry of a Decree against the respondents herein, enforcing its order dated March 3, 1960. … This Court has considered the entire transcript of record filed in this cause, and on November 3, 1960 being fully advised in the premises, issued its decision granting the petition and enforcing the said Order of the Board

National Labor Relations Board v. Galicks, Inc.

671 F.3d 602 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 2012

Page 6 statutory authority to exercise the Board’s delegated powers. New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 560 U.S. ___, 130 S. Ct. 2635, 2645 (2010). Consequently, we remanded the case to the Board. See Galicks, Inc. v. … Galicks must show that the Board’s story is unreasonable. Accord Island Creek Coal Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mackneish

272 F.2d 184 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 9, 1959

The issue is essentially one of fact; and determination of the facts, and the inferences to be drawn therefrom are for the Board. … A review of the copious record discloses that the Board’s findings were supported by substantial evidence on the record, considered as a whole. *185 The petition of the Board for enforcement of its order is, accordingly,

Kellogg Company v. National Labor Relations Board

457 F.2d 519 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 1972

This is a petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board 1 and a cross petition for enforcement of such order. The Board ordered reinstatement of two employees of the petitioner with back pay. … National Labor Relations Board v.

United States v. Board of Education

581 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 1978

reasons set out by District Judge Thomas in his Memorandum Opinion filed October 4, 1976, 435 F.Supp. 949 (1976) and for the reasons set out in the Opinion of the three judge District Court in the case of United States v.