Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.71s
Othen v. Ann Arbor School Board
699 F.2d 309 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 2, 1983
Othen v. Ann Arbor School Board, 507 F.Supp. 1376 (E.D.Mich.1981). A final judgment dismissing the action was then entered. *313 B. … In Johnston v. Jago, supra, this court adopted the reasoning of Nadeau v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDerek Sweatt v. Samuel Philipp
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 9, 2025
See Jones v. … (citing Bard v. Brown County, 970 F.3d 738, 750 (6th Cir. 2020)). Sweatt has thus failed to show entitlement to relief under Rule 60(b)(6).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEdward Brown, Quebecor, Inc., Intervening v. The Raymond Corporation
432 F.3d 640 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 21, 2005
Brown v. The Raymond Corp., 318 F.Supp.2d 591, 599-600 (W.D.Tenn.2004). … The only one of the five Tennessee cases that cuts in favor of Brown’s position is Hughes v.
Cited 60 timesPublished84 F. App'x 625 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 15, 2003
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, All U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). In order to recover under the ADA, Banks was required to show that he is disabled. Cassidy v. … Laurin v. Providence Hosp., 150 F.3d 52, 61 (1st Cir.1998). Nor is an employer required to shift difficult tasks to a worker’s fellow employees. Hoskins v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThe Amberley Company v. The Brown Company
408 F.2d 1358 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 17, 1969
He obviously did not believe the testimony of Schulman and Brown. We are of the opinion that this finding of fact of the District Judge is supported by substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous. United States v. … KVP was acquired by The Brown Company, appellee, in 1966, and Brown was substituted as a party defendant in the place of KVP.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDickey v. National Labor Relations Board
217 F.2d 652 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 16, 1954
B. v. Colten, 105 F.2d 179, 183 , and N. L. R. B. v. Fred P. Weissman Co., 170 F.2d 952, 954 , which control decision here. … B. v. Franks Bros. Co., 1 Cir., 137 F.2d 989 ; Continental Oil Company v. N. L. R. B., 10 Cir., 113 F.2d *656 473 ; N. L. R. B. v. E. A. Laboratories, Inc., 2 Cir., 188 F.2d 885 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedMargaret White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 2012
Kuebel, 643 F.3d at 365 (reversing summary judgment); Brown v. Family Dollar Stores of Ind., LP, 534 F.3d 593, 596-97 (7th Cir. 2008) (same); Allen v. Bd. of Pub. … 728, 740 (1981) (noting FLSA rights cannot be waived); see also Allen, 495 F.3d at 1321 (“[E]ven if these Plaintiffs did not inform their supervisors that they were not recording their hours, a jury could still charge the Board
Cited 0 timesPublished451 F.2d 158 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 24, 1971
See Wells v. United States, 311 F.2d 409 (10th Cir. 1962). A conviction under Count 1 (second paragraph) would have required a sentence of 25 years. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. 1 . … That in attempting such robbery, Edward Brown, defendant herein', did knowingly and willfully aid and abet another person, unknown by name to the Grand Jury, to put the life of the said Charles Bartlett in jeopardy by the
Cited 0 timesPublishedMoore v. Detroit School Reform Board
293 F.3d 352 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 2002
293 F.3d 352 Helen MOORE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DETROIT SCHOOL REFORM BOARD; David Adamany; Dennis W. … The act in question in Burton v. Lindsay, like the legislation now before us, was designed to change the composition of the school board in Detroit. The opinion in Burton v.
Cited 1 timesPublished789 F.2d 374 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 25, 1986
789 F.2d 374 Katherine RANN; Lawrence Rann; Sue Brown; Kenneth Brown; Judith Brown; Leland Brown; Ruth Strand; Gordon Strand; and Mary Brown, Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. W.P. McINNIS, M.D.; Victoria Hospital; and St. … Keenan, 79 Mich.App. 543 , 261 N.W.2d 80, 82 , quoting Gelineau v. N.Y.U. Hospital, 375 F.Supp. 661, 667 (D.N.J.1974). 22 International Shoe Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedKellogg Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
840 F.3d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 26, 2016
Though we also review de novo the Board’s legal conclusions that are unrelated to the NLRA, Montague v. NLRB, 698 F.3d 307, 314 (6th Cir. Nos. 15-2031/2183 Kellogg Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedGlenn v. Merit Systems Protection Board
616 F.2d 270 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1980
The petitioners seek review of adverse personnel actions by the Merit Systems Protection Board (the “Board”). … The Board’s regulation lends support for our interpretation of the Savings Clause. The regulation has been held valid. Kyles v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Lowe
406 F.2d 1033 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1969
An examination of the record is convincing that the Board’s decisions and orders, based upon the findings of the trial examiner, are sustained by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. … In consideration of the foregoing, enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.
Cited 1 timesPublishedExum v. National Labor Relations Board
546 F.3d 719 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 7, 2008
National Labor Relations Board Page 6 Plasti-Line, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., 278 F.2d 482, 486-87 (6th Cir. 1960). … V. Conclusion There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s determination.
Cited 5 timesPublishedNational Credit Union Administration Board v. Jurcevic
867 F.3d 616 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 2017
The Board thus established that the Nos. 14-4297/ Nat’l Credit Union Admin. Bd. v. Jurcevic, et al. … Bd. v. Jurcevic, et al. Page 7 15-3324/ 17-3162 fraudulent conduct, as required by the Bankruptcy Code as opposed to state law, in determining whether to discharge his debts to St. Paul. See Brown v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedFrank Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
948 F.2d 268 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 1, 1991
Brown’s I.Q. scores should be deemed in *270 valid. The Secretary claims that a full-scale I.Q. score of 68 is inconsistent with Mr. Brown’s functional abilities. … Brown’s I.Q. scores indicate Mild Mental Retardation. Furthermore, Mr. Brown’s biography fits squarely within the DSM-III-R profile of a mildly retarded individual.
Cited 38 timesPublishedAnthony v. National Labor Relations Board
204 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 1953
A decision by the General Counsel not to issue a. complaint is not reviewable by the National Labor Relations Board or in the courts. Lincourt v. National Labor Relations Board, 1 Cir., 170 F.2d 306 . … The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has adopted the Labor Board’s definition of a “ ‘final order of the Board’ ” in Laundry Workers International Union Local 221 v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedGary L. Penick v. Columbus Board of Education, and the Ohio State Board of Education
583 F.2d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1978
The opinion of the Court in Brown v. … Board of Educ. of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) [Brown I]; Green v. County School Bd. of New Kent Co., 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968); Swann v.
Cited 47 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Michalik
201 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 19, 1952
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the Board’s findings that respondent violated Section 8( … , and the court being duly advised, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the National Labor Relations Board be enforced.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHarry Whitney Cross-Appellants v. Robert Brown Cross-Appellees
882 F.2d 1068 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 15, 1989
The named defendants included Robert Brown, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, and Dale Foltz, Warden of the Michigan State Prison (“prison officials”). … Walker v. Mintzes, 771 F.2d 920, 930 (6th Cir.1985). Prison inmates do not lose their right to exercise their religion by virtue of incarceration. Turner v.
Cited 100 timesPublished
Ask Donna