Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

0.71s

  • Othen v. Ann Arbor School Board

    699 F.2d 309 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 2, 1983

    Othen v. Ann Arbor School Board, 507 F.Supp. 1376 (E.D.Mich.1981). A final judgment dismissing the action was then entered. *313 B. … In Johnston v. Jago, supra, this court adopted the reasoning of Nadeau v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Derek Sweatt v. Samuel Philipp

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 9, 2025

    See Jones v. … (citing Bard v. Brown County, 970 F.3d 738, 750 (6th Cir. 2020)). Sweatt has thus failed to show entitlement to relief under Rule 60(b)(6).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Edward Brown, Quebecor, Inc., Intervening v. The Raymond Corporation

    432 F.3d 640 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 21, 2005

    Brown v. The Raymond Corp., 318 F.Supp.2d 591, 599-600 (W.D.Tenn.2004). … The only one of the five Tennessee cases that cuts in favor of Brown’s position is Hughes v.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Banks v. Brown-Forman Corp.

    84 F. App'x 625 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 15, 2003

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, All U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). In order to recover under the ADA, Banks was required to show that he is disabled. Cassidy v. … Laurin v. Providence Hosp., 150 F.3d 52, 61 (1st Cir.1998). Nor is an employer required to shift difficult tasks to a worker’s fellow employees. Hoskins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Amberley Company v. The Brown Company

    408 F.2d 1358 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 17, 1969

    He obviously did not believe the testimony of Schulman and Brown. We are of the opinion that this finding of fact of the District Judge is supported by substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous. United States v. … KVP was acquired by The Brown Company, appellee, in 1966, and Brown was substituted as a party defendant in the place of KVP.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dickey v. National Labor Relations Board

    217 F.2d 652 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 16, 1954

    B. v. Colten, 105 F.2d 179, 183 , and N. L. R. B. v. Fred P. Weissman Co., 170 F.2d 952, 954 , which control decision here. … B. v. Franks Bros. Co., 1 Cir., 137 F.2d 989 ; Continental Oil Company v. N. L. R. B., 10 Cir., 113 F.2d *656 473 ; N. L. R. B. v. E. A. Laboratories, Inc., 2 Cir., 188 F.2d 885 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Margaret White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Co.

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 2012

    Kuebel, 643 F.3d at 365 (reversing summary judgment); Brown v. Family Dollar Stores of Ind., LP, 534 F.3d 593, 596-97 (7th Cir. 2008) (same); Allen v. Bd. of Pub. … 728, 740 (1981) (noting FLSA rights cannot be waived); see also Allen, 495 F.3d at 1321 (“[E]ven if these Plaintiffs did not inform their supervisors that they were not recording their hours, a jury could still charge the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Edward Brown

    451 F.2d 158 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 24, 1971

    See Wells v. United States, 311 F.2d 409 (10th Cir. 1962). A conviction under Count 1 (second paragraph) would have required a sentence of 25 years. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. 1 . … That in attempting such robbery, Edward Brown, defendant herein', did knowingly and willfully aid and abet another person, unknown by name to the Grand Jury, to put the life of the said Charles Bartlett in jeopardy by the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Detroit School Reform Board

    293 F.3d 352 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 2002

    293 F.3d 352 Helen MOORE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DETROIT SCHOOL REFORM BOARD; David Adamany; Dennis W. … The act in question in Burton v. Lindsay, like the legislation now before us, was designed to change the composition of the school board in Detroit. The opinion in Burton v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • RANN v. McINNIS

    789 F.2d 374 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 25, 1986

    789 F.2d 374 Katherine RANN; Lawrence Rann; Sue Brown; Kenneth Brown; Judith Brown; Leland Brown; Ruth Strand; Gordon Strand; and Mary Brown, Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. W.P. McINNIS, M.D.; Victoria Hospital; and St. … Keenan, 79 Mich.App. 543 , 261 N.W.2d 80, 82 , quoting Gelineau v. N.Y.U. Hospital, 375 F.Supp. 661, 667 (D.N.J.1974). 22 International Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kellogg Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    840 F.3d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 26, 2016

    Though we also review de novo the Board’s legal conclusions that are unrelated to the NLRA, Montague v. NLRB, 698 F.3d 307, 314 (6th Cir. Nos. 15-2031/2183 Kellogg Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Glenn v. Merit Systems Protection Board

    616 F.2d 270 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1980

    The petitioners seek review of adverse personnel actions by the Merit Systems Protection Board (the “Board”). … The Board’s regulation lends support for our interpretation of the Savings Clause. The regulation has been held valid. Kyles v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Lowe

    406 F.2d 1033 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1969

    An examination of the record is convincing that the Board’s decisions and orders, based upon the findings of the trial examiner, are sustained by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. … In consideration of the foregoing, enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Exum v. National Labor Relations Board

    546 F.3d 719 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 7, 2008

    National Labor Relations Board Page 6 Plasti-Line, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., 278 F.2d 482, 486-87 (6th Cir. 1960). … V. Conclusion There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s determination.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Credit Union Administration Board v. Jurcevic

    867 F.3d 616 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 2017

    The Board thus established that the Nos. 14-4297/ Nat’l Credit Union Admin. Bd. v. Jurcevic, et al. … Bd. v. Jurcevic, et al. Page 7 15-3324/ 17-3162 fraudulent conduct, as required by the Bankruptcy Code as opposed to state law, in determining whether to discharge his debts to St. Paul. See Brown v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Frank Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    948 F.2d 268 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 1, 1991

    Brown’s I.Q. scores should be deemed in *270 valid. The Secretary claims that a full-scale I.Q. score of 68 is inconsistent with Mr. Brown’s functional abilities. … Brown’s I.Q. scores indicate Mild Mental Retardation. Furthermore, Mr. Brown’s biography fits squarely within the DSM-III-R profile of a mildly retarded individual.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Anthony v. National Labor Relations Board

    204 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 1953

    A decision by the General Counsel not to issue a. complaint is not reviewable by the National Labor Relations Board or in the courts. Lincourt v. National Labor Relations Board, 1 Cir., 170 F.2d 306 . … The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has adopted the Labor Board’s definition of a “ ‘final order of the Board’ ” in Laundry Workers International Union Local 221 v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Gary L. Penick v. Columbus Board of Education, and the Ohio State Board of Education

    583 F.2d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1978

    The opinion of the Court in Brown v. … Board of Educ. of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) [Brown I]; Green v. County School Bd. of New Kent Co., 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968); Swann v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Michalik

    201 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 19, 1952

    The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the Board’s findings that respondent violated Section 8( … , and the court being duly advised, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the National Labor Relations Board be enforced.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harry Whitney Cross-Appellants v. Robert Brown Cross-Appellees

    882 F.2d 1068 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 15, 1989

    The named defendants included Robert Brown, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, and Dale Foltz, Warden of the Michigan State Prison (“prison officials”). … Walker v. Mintzes, 771 F.2d 920, 930 (6th Cir.1985). Prison inmates do not lose their right to exercise their religion by virtue of incarceration. Turner v.

    Cited 100 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.