Case law

United States v. Raymond Williams (91-1025), Kevin T. Wilson (91-1495/1496), and Beverly Powell (91-1549)

962 F.2d 1218 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1992

See United States v. Coleman, 628 F.2d 961, 963 (6th Cir.1980). However, the district court’s conclusions of law are subject to de novo review on appeal. See Whitney v. Brown, 882 F.2d 1068, 1071 (6th Cir.1989). … See United States v.

LaFleur v. Cleveland Board of Education

465 F.2d 1184 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 27, 1972

LaFleur v. Cleveland Board of Education (N. D. Ohio 1971), 32 Ohio Misc., 193 , 326 F. Supp. 1208, 1211 . … Supp. 593 ; Kirstein v. Rector and Visitors of University of Virginia (E. D. Va. 1970), 309 F. Supp. 184 ; Heath v. Westerville Board of Education et al. (S. D. Ohio 1972), 345 F. Supp. 501 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Ford

170 F.2d 735 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 15, 1948

The probative value of such testimony was for the Board. N.L. R.B. v. Donnelly Garment Co., 330 U.S. 219, 231 , 67 S.Ct. 756 , 91 L.Ed. 854 . … If it is substantially contradicted by the other evidence and the accompanying circumstances, the Board is not required to accept it. N.L.R.B. v. Tex-O-Kan F.

John M. Brown v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

623 F.2d 450 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 1980

Plaintiff-Appellant John Brown is appealing from the District Court’s order granting judgment n. o. v. for the defendant after the jury had returned a verdict of $250,000 in Brown’s favor. … John Brown was a welder foreman employed by Tex-Ten, Inc.

James Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education, Richard Donnelly v. Parma Board of Education

721 F.2d 550 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 17, 1983

Zier v. … Brown.

Memphis Trust Co. v. Brown-Ketchum Iron Works

166 F. 398 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 20, 1909

Citing Sweeney v. United States, R. R. Co. v. March, and United States v. Gleason. … Such was the situation in Railroad Co. v. March, Railroad Co. v. Price, Mundy v. Railroad Co., and in C. & M. Ry. Co. v. Newton. As suggested in C. & M. Ry. Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Wiltse

188 F.2d 917 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 1951

Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Ford et al., supra.

United States of America v. Charles H. Brown

536 F.2d 117 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 1976

In Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. … See United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141, 147-48 , 95 S.Ct. 915, 919-920 , 43 L.Ed.2d 88, 94 (1975); United States v.

United States v. Robert E. Iles, Sr.

906 F.2d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 27, 1990

Welty, 674 F.2d 185, 187 (3rd Cir.1982); McKee v. Harris, 649 F.2d 927, 933-34 (2nd Cir.1981); United States v. Williams, 594 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam); Brown v. … This is not such a case. lies also cites Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166 (9th Cir.1970). In Brown, however, the defendant actively attempted to obtain new counsel.

Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of Education

576 F.2d 714 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 25, 1978

The school board’s settlement payment of $150,037.50 should be subtracted, leaving a total liability for appellants of $133,887.50. … The history of the case can be found in the following cases, all entitled Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of Education, 346 F.Supp. 766 (W.D.

Inman v. Michigan Parole Board

46 F. App'x 834 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 24, 2002

Inman filed his complaint in the district court alleging that the defendant individual members of the Michigan Parole Board violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment when they used false and fraudulent information regarding … See Sweeton v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1164 (6th Cir.1994) (en banc). Further, plaintiff has no legitimate entitlement to or expectation of participation in Michigan’s sex offender treatment program. See Greenholtz v.

Hamilton v. National Labor Relations Board

160 F.2d 465 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 31, 1947

B. v. Sands Mfg. … Hill v. Florida, 325 U.S. 538 , 65 S.Ct. 1373 , 89 L.Ed. 1782 . Compare Allen-Bradley Local v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 U.S. 740 , 62 S.Ct. 820 , 86 L.Ed. 1154 .

Robert C. Bransford v. Robert Brown Dale Foltz

806 F.2d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 1987

Anderson v. Harless, 459 U.S. 4, 7-8 , 103 S.Ct. 276, 277-78 , 74 L.Ed.2d 3 (1982). See also People v. … Smart v. Pate, 318 F.2d 559 (7th Cir.1963); United States ex rel. Hunter v.

East Tennessee Baptist Hospital, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

6 F.3d 1139 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 7, 1993

STANDARD OF REVIEW On review, the Board’s findings of fact will be upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … A reviewing “[c]ourt[ ] must, of course, set aside Board decisions which rest on an ‘erroneous legal foundation.’ ” NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965), citing NLRB v.

Darvin Webb v. Railroad Retirement Board

358 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 11, 1966

Slone v. Gardner, 355 F.2d 485 (6th Cir. 1966); Miracle v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 361 (No. 15,992 6th Cir. 1965); Massey v. Celebrezze, 345 F.2d 146 (6th Cir. 1965); Ratliff v. … Celebrezze, 338 F.2d 978 (6th Cir. 1964); Thompson v. Celebrezze, 334 F.2d 412 (6th Cir. 1964); Prewitt v. Celebrezze, 330 F.2d 93 (6th Cir. 1964); Jones v. Celebrezze, 321 F.2d 192 (6th Cir. 1963); Rice v.

Mary Kessler v. Board of Regents

738 F.2d 751 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 11, 1984

See, e.g., Barry v. … It is well-settled that the Board of Regents is subject to the requirements of § 4-5-113(a). State Board of Regents of Univ. v. Gray, 561 S.W.2d 140 (Tenn.1978).

Percy Dwayne Brown v. Louisville-Jefferson Cnty. Metro Gov't

135 F.4th 1022 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 30, 2025

Other Precedent None of the other cases Brown cites help him, either. Mills v. … No. 23-5673 Brown v. Louisville-Jefferson Cnty. Metro Gov’t, et al. Page 17 And McDonough v. Smith, 588 U.S. 109 (2019), also does not help Brown.

Lowery v. Jefferson County Board of Education

586 F.3d 427 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 12, 2009

See Brown v. Crowley, 312 F.3d 782, 788 (6th Cir.2002).) *432 We give fresh review to the denial of the motion for a judgment as a matter of law and abuse-of-discretion review to the motion for a new trial. … In Thomas v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lassing

284 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 1960

This case presents basically the same question considered by this Court and decided adversely to the Board’s contention in N. L. R. B. v. Adkins Transfer Co., 6 Cir., 226 F.2d 324 , and *783 N. L. R. B. v. R. C. … B. v. Houston Chronicle Pub. Co., supra. Enforcement of the Board’s order is denied.

Collard v. Kentucky Board of Nursing

896 F.2d 179 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 17, 1990

In McSurely v. … This leaves us with a three-year statute in Michigan, Carroll v. Wilkerson, 782 F.2d 44 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 923 , 107 S.Ct. 330 , 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); a two-year statute in Ohio, Browning v.