Case law

Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

863 F.2d 1292 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 22, 1988

“The Board’s application of the law to the facts is also reviewed under the substantial evidence standard, and the Board’s reasonable inferences may not be displaced on review.” NLRB v. … See also NLRB v.

Ariel Luna-Romero v. William P. Barr

949 F.3d 292 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 11, 2020

The Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed his appeal from the denial of these applications. We deny his petition for review.  No. 19-3151 Luna v. … Pan v. Gonzales, 489 F.3d 80, 86 (1st Cir. 2007). The Board reasonably upheld the adverse credibility determination. That decision,  No. 19-3151 Luna v.

United States v. Daniel Brown

237 F.3d 625 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 16, 2001

United States v. Jarman, 144 F.3d 912, 914 (6th Cir. 1998); United States v. Gort-DiDonato, 109 F.3d 318, 320 (6th Cir.1997). … United States v. Lister, 53 F.3d 66, 71 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Oppedahl, 998 F.2d 584, 586 (8th Cir.1993).

United States v. Don Brown

367 F.3d 549 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 2004

In Estelle v. … Brown is entitled to points for acceptance of responsibility.

Coweta Fertilizer Co. v. Brown

163 F. 162 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 16, 1908

On December 1, 1901, Brown was obligated to pay or settle by cash or bankable notes for goods sold or unsold, regardless of sale on credit by him, good or bad. Every risk of loss by blameless accident rested upon Brown. … Eq. § 1,235; Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654, 665 , 17 Sup. Ct. 453, 41 L. Ed. 865 ; Bank v. Owens, 2 Pet. 527, 539 , 7 L. Ed. 508 ; Miller v. Ammon, 145 U. S. 421, 426 , 12 Sup. Ct. *166 884, 36 L.

Carson Lynn Brown v. Robert Brown, Jr.

37 F.3d 1498 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 14, 1994

See, e.g., Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 113 S.Ct. 397, 397 (1992) (per curiam); Reneer v. … Brown is deemed to have abandoned his claim through his failure to raise the issue in his brief on appeal. See Boyd v.

Richmond Health Facilities-Kenwood, LP v. Nichols

811 F.3d 192 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 15, 2016

Plaintiffs ignore this freedom of choice that wrongful-death beneficiaries have under Ping, and argue that Ping is similar to the state rule in Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown, 132 S. … Co. v.

United States v. Brown

55 F. App'x 753 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 11, 2003

On appeal, Brown’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). … See United States v. Landers, 39 F.3d 643, 649 (6th Cir.1994). *754 We also conclude that the district court properly accepted Brown’s guilty plea. See North Carolina v.

United States v. Chalmers Brown

444 F.3d 519 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 14, 2006

United States v. Brown, 371 F.3d 854, 861 (6th Cir.2004). On remand Brown was sentenced to 280 months’ imprisonment, which he now appeals on the grounds that his sentence is invalid under United States v. … United States v. Christopher, 415 F.3d 590, 593 (6th Cir.2005); United States v. McDaniel, 398 F.3d 540, 546 (6th Cir.2005). In United States v.

Northern Steamship Co. v. Brown

62 F. 71 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 8, 1894

Justice Brown in the case of The City of New York, 147 U. S. 72 -84, 13 Sup. … Mary’s river, Use next day, those on board of tier were informed of the collision.

United States v. David Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 26, 2009

No. 07-4197 United States v. Brown Page 10 (J.A. at 165.) … No. 07-4197 United States v. Brown Page 11 Campbell, 81 F.

United States v. Gerry M. Davis

473 F.3d 680 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 17, 2007

See United States v. … Chance is distinguished from United States v. Brown, 959 F.2d 63 (6th Cir.1992), where the de minimis interstate commerce connection was established.

Brown v. Abbott Laboratories

90 F. App'x 891 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 5, 2004

Bloch v. Ribar, 156 F.3d 673, 677 (6th Cir.1998); Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir. 1996). … See Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 393 , 102 S.Ct. 1127 , 71 L.Ed.2d 234 (1982). Accordingly, the district court properly held that Brown could not bring a Title VII claim against Abbott.

United States v. Brown

9 F. App'x 442 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 16, 2001

Defendant Timothy Brown appeals the sentence entered on his guilty plea to possessing an unregistered shotgun with a barrel length of less than eighteen inches in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5822 5861(d), and 5871. … Defendant cites Hunter v. United States, 160 F.3d 1109, 1114 (6th Cir.1998), wherein we held that the defendant had not waived his appellate rights.

Brown v. Ralston Purina Co.

557 F.2d 570 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1977

V, 1975). The complaint claimed that Brown had been discharged and the members of the class had been discriminated against in appellee’s employment policies because of their race, color and religion. … Appellant Brown’s case was tried to the court.

United States v. Jermaine Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 2025

No. 24-6029 United States v. Brown Page 3 Shortly after the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in District of Columbia v. … Brown’s reliance on United States v. Williams, 113 F.4th 637 (6th Cir. 2024), is thus inapposite.

Pennsylvania R. v. Brown

111 F.2d 983 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1940

Section 185; National Bank of Commerce v. Merchants’ National Bank of Memphis, 91 U.S. 92 , 23 L.Ed. 208 . … Dows v. National Exchange Bank, 91 U.S. 618, 631 , 23 L.Ed. 214 . The District Court was correct in concluding that appellee was the lawful holder of the bills of lading and owner of the wool.

Brown-Forman Corp. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 6, 2026

Thus, the Board did not err in  Nos. 24-2107/25-1060 Brown-Forman Corp. v. … The Cemex Board did not create the new  Nos. 24-2107/25-1060 Brown-Forman Corp. v.

United States v. Brown

96 F. App'x 380 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 29, 2004

The district court sentenced Brown to 240 months of imprisonment and ten years of supervised release. *382 On appeal, Brown’s counsel moves to withdraw and files a brief pursuant to Anders v. … Baker v. United States, 781 F.2d 85, 90 (6th Cir. 1986). The district court properly sentenced Brown.

Louis Chandler v. Mike Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 31, 2025

See Herrera v. Collins, 506  No. 23-1270 Chandler v. Brown Page 5 U.S. 390, 399–400 (1993). … See, e.g., Brown v. Davenport, 596 U.S. 118, 135–37 (2022); Shinn, 592 U.S. at 118–24.