Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Niles Fire Brick Co.

128 F.2d 258 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 11, 1942

We conclude that the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence. National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 358 , 85 L.Ed. 368 . … Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 312 U.S. 660 , 61 S.Ct. 736 , 85 L.Ed. 1108 , and National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance Mach.

Melvin Wicker v. Board of Education of Knott County, Kentucky

826 F.2d 442 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 1987

Cleveland Board of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Averitt v. Cloon, 796 F.2d 195 (6th Cir.1986) (both quoting Board of Regents v. … Board of Educ. of McCreary County, 450 S.W.2d 229, 233 (Ky.1970); Hoskins v. Keen, 350 S.W.2d 467, 469 (Ky.1961). Second, language from Calhoun v.

Howard Plating Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

635 F.2d 532 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 12, 1980

Before us we have an application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board against Howard Plating Industries, Inc. … As stated in N.L.R.B. v.

Detroit Plastic Molding Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

595 F.2d 1320 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 18, 1979

ORDER On receipt and consideration of a petition for review filed in the above-styled case and *1321 cross-petition for enforcement filed by the National Labor Relations Board (see case reported at 228 N.L.R.B. … only appropriate bargaining unit possible); and Finding no arbitrary or capricious action on the part of the Board in its determination, The order of the Board is hereby enforced.

ATR Wire & Cable Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

752 F.2d 201 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 9, 1985

The conduct here, as noted above, is similar to that found unobjectionable by the Board and the Sixth Circuit in N.L.R.B. v. Bostik Division, U.S.M. Corporation, [ 517 F.2d 971 (6th Cir.1975)]. … As this court held in NLRB v.

Atherton v. Anderson

86 F.2d 518 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 11, 1936

at the time the property was acquired and those who came on the board in April, 1927, “when the bank was united with the Louisville Trust Company [see Laurent v. … the examiner’s reports bv Brown to the board, it will be remembered that these reports were made in duplicate, one copy being furnished to the bank and the other to the Comptroller.

King v. Brown

948 F.2d 1289 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 19, 1991

Thomas v. … Kent v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Stemun Manufacturing Company, Inc.

386 F.2d 174 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 24, 1967

The evidence is conflicting, and ordinarily this Court would review the evidence to ascertain if it is sufficient to support the Board’s order. … Mitten-dorf, counsel for the Board, during the investigation of this case several weeks prior to the hearing. There was no denial of this testimony and it is not discussed in the brief for the Board.

Sebest v. Campbell City School District Board of Education

94 F. App'x 320 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 2004

See Robinson v. … Comm’n v.

Amanda Morrison v. Board of Trustees of Green Township

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 8, 2009

Procedural History Amanda, Dennis, and Cynthia brought the underlying lawsuit in the Southern District of Ohio against the Board of Trustees of Green Township; Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio … Baker v.

National Labor Relations Board v. A & B Hydraulic Co.

106 F. App'x 988 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 19, 2004

JUDGMENT The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) applies for summary enforcement of its March 31, 2004, decision and order in Case No. 7-CA-46735 in which it found the respondent violated federal labor law and directed … The respondent did not file an answer to the complaint and has not made an appearance either before the Board or this court. Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought.

Detroit Consolidated Theatres v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

133 F.2d 200 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 18, 1942

v. … Helvering, 291 U.S. 193, 201 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 ; North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U.S. 417, 424 , 52 S.Ct. 613 , 76 L.Ed. 1197 .

Paducah Marine Ways v. Maurice Thompson Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

82 F.3d 130 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 24, 1996

Brown v. ITT/Continental Baking Co., 921 F.2d 289 , 293 (D.C.Cir.1990). … Abel v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, 932 F.2d 819, 821 (9th Cir.1991); Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Parker, 935 F.2d 20, 27 (4th Cir.1991); Brown v.

Baji v. Northeast Regional Board of Dental Examiners, Inc.

3 F. App'x 352 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 31, 2001

Cox v. State Medical Board of Ohio, 83 Ohio App. 316 , 83 N.E.2d 648, 650 (1948). … As a group of dentists legally empowered to determine issues of dental competency, the Board is in a far better institutional position to evaluate Baji’s charges than are the courts. See Riffe v.

Brown v. Brown

904 F.2d 706 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 8, 1990

Carson Lynn BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr.; Dan Bolden; Marjorie Van Ochten; Travis Jones; Anita Wilson; S. … Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 742-45 (1976); Solomon v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 782 F.2d 58, 59-60 (6th Cir.1986). No 54(b) certification was made in the instant case.

American Commercial Barge Lines Company v. National Labor Relations Board

758 F.2d 1109 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 1985

P 11,410 AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Donald L. Dotson, Donald A. Zimmerman, Robert P. Hunter, Patricia Diaz Dennis, William A. Lubbers and Emil C. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 290-94 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1711-14 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). See also Pennzoil Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 534 F.2d 627, 630 (5th Cir.1976); Charles River Park "A", Inc. v.

Richard W. Brown v. Local 58, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio

76 F.3d 762 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 26, 1996

While this court has no decision directly on point, Othen v. Ann Arbor School Board, 699 F.2d 309 (6th Cir.1983) reached the same conclusion, albeit implicitly. … In Hall v.

National Labor Relations Board v. H & H Pretzel Co.

831 F.2d 650 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 19, 1987

Board if so supported. … We are constrained, however, by the deference a court gives to a Board finding of impasse. See Dallas General Drivers, etc. v.

Board of Supervisors of Presque Isle County v. Thompson

61 F. 914 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 8, 1894

In the case of Ashley v. Board, 8 C. C. … Turnbull v. School Dist., 45 Mich. 496 , 8 N. W. 65 ; Maltz v. Board, 41 Mich. 547 , 49 N. W. 920 .

Madeira Nursing Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

615 F.2d 728 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 25, 1980

The Board sent an agent to investigate the petition. … C., Inc. v. IRS, 502 F.2d 133 (3rd Cir. 1974), supports this interpretation.