Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

2.59s

  • Mitchellace, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    90 F.3d 1150 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 1996

    Co. v. … In NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Unpublished Disposition John Perotti, Cross-Appellant v. Richard Seiter, Gary Brown, Cross-Appellee

    869 F.2d 1492 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 16, 1989

    B. 18 Brown also argues that his actions were protected by the defense of qualified good faith immunity as set out in Harlow v. … Indeed, Whitley relied upon Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977), which in turn relied upon Estelle v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • The Kroger Company v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Plumbers, Steamfitters, & Pipefitters Local No. 155

    477 F.2d 1104 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 11, 1973

    American Bread Company v. NLRB, 411 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1969). … See Reynolds v. Plumbers, Local 155, 79 LRRM 2224 (E.D.Ark., 1971).” Therefore, if the Board’s approval of the handbilling is approved, such hand-billing might indeed be resumed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Francile Sirak v. Ted W. Brown, Secretary of State of Ohio

    435 F.2d 1309 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 1970

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • James Kenneth Bale v. Glasgow Tobacco Board of Trade, Incorporated

    339 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 1964

    The argument, therefore, that the Sherman Act does not restrain state action, as decided in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 5. Ct. 307, 87 L.Ed. 315 , is not applicable to the facts of this case. … Douglas Tobacco Board of Trade, 244 F.2d 471 , C.A. 5, 266 F.2d 636 , C.A. 5; and Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc. v. F.T.C., 263 F.2d 502 , C.A. 4. 9 . American Federation of Tobacco Growers v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Public Service Commission of Tennessee and the State Board of Equalization of Tennessee

    389 F.2d 247 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 14, 1968

    Ry. v. … In the Browning case, the Supreme Court, speaking through Mr.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Larry Wooden v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky

    931 F.2d 376 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1991

    McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1824 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); see also Chappell v. GTE Prods. … See McDonald v. Union Camp Corp., 898 F.2d 1155, 1162 (6th Cir.1990). Therefore, the district court properly granted the Board’s motion.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Brown Co. And Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co

    636 F.2d 1217 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 21, 1980

    636 F.2d 1217 Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Brown Co. and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. 78-1582, 78-1583 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 11/21/80 1 W.D.Mich. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

    346 F.2d 527 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 1965

    In National Labor Relations Board v. … B. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Timken Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    29 F. App'x 266 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 4, 2002

    The Board’s “findings of facts, as well as its application of law to fact, may not be disturbed where substantial evidence on the record taken as a whole supports the Board’s findings and conclusions.” NLRB v. … Timken casts its first contention of error as follows: whether the Board erred, in the light of Lechmere, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mid-America Care Foundation v. National Labor Relations Board

    148 F.3d 638 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 8, 1998

    P 10,193 MID-AMERICA CARE FOUNDATION, d/b/a Fair Oaks Health Care Center, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. Nos. 97-5433, 97-5535. … See Grancare, Inc. v. NLRB, 137 F.3d 372 (6th Cir.1998); Caremore, Inc. v. NLRB, 129 F.3d 365 (6th Cir.1997); Manor West, Inc. v. NLRB, 60 F.3d 1195 (6th Cir.1995); Health Care & Retirement Corp. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. S.E. Nichols of Ohio, Inc.

    704 F.2d 921 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 1983

    A panel of this court granted enforcement of the Board’s order. NLRB v. S.E. Nichols of Ohio, Inc., 472 F.2d 1228 (6th Cir.1972). … See also NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir.1963). We also find that Nichols’ objections to the net back pay awards are without merit.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Association for the Blind v. National Labor Relations Board

    672 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1982

    Once again, the Association has entered an area of Board discretion which is subject to limited judicial review, Glen Manor Home for the Jewish Aged v. NLRB, 474 F.2d 1145 (6th Cir. 1973); NLRB v. … We agree, and decline to disturb this exercise of the Board’s discretion. See Michigan Hospital Service Corp. v. NLRB, *574 472 F.2d 293 (6th Cir. 1972); NLRB v. Southern Metal Service, 606 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1979).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Spring Arbor Distribution Company

    59 F.3d 600 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 17, 1995

    We *604 have held that “[t]he Board’s determinations regarding whether and when an election should be held are reviewed for abuse of discretion.” NLRB v. Engineers Constructors, Inc., 756 F.2d 464, 467 (6th Cir.1985). … Therefore, our review must include consideration of any record evidence that runs contrary to the Board’s findings. DTR Indus., Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. A & B Hydraulic Co.

    106 F. App'x 988 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 19, 2004

    JUDGMENT The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) applies for summary enforcement of its March 31, 2004, decision and order in Case No. 7-CA-46735 in which it found the respondent violated federal labor law and directed … The respondent did not file an answer to the complaint and has not made an appearance either before the Board or this court. Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. H & H Plastics Manufacturing Co.

    389 F.2d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 15, 1968

    Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 375 F.2d 551 (C.A. 6), reversing Board’s finding of lack of good faith; *683 Pizza Products Corporation v. … N.L.R.B., 369 F.2d 431 (C.A. 6), also reversing Board’s finding of lack of good faith; N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation, 351 F.2d 917 (C.A. 6), affirming Board’s finding of lack of good faith; N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Herman Brothers Pet Supply, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    360 F.2d 176 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 21, 1966

    . § 156 (1964); Lewis v. … Bowman v. Montcalm Circuit Judge, 129 Mich. 608 , 89 N.W. 334 (1902); Williams v. Brown, 137 Mich. 569 , 100 N.W. 786 (1904); People v. Atwood, 188 Mich. 36 , 154 N.W. 112 (1915) [dictum]; In re Reid, 155 P. 933 (E.D.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • I. A. Watson, Jr. v. City of Memphis, Tennessee

    303 F.2d 863 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 1962

    v. … Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 , is inapplicable to a case involving public recreational facilities. We are of the view that the principle stated in Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Towel & Uniform Service

    473 F.2d 1258 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 23, 1973

    B. v. Penn Cork & Closures, Inc., 376 F.2d 52, 55 (2nd Cir. 1967)). The unambiguous language of this contract is controlling since the parties are presumed to have known what they were signing. N. L. R. B. v. … Co. v. N. L. R. B., 113 F.2d 992 (2nd Cir. 1940), the Board insisted that a union was dominated by the company although the employees had agreed to a checkoff of union dues.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Russell v. Commissioner

    832 F.2d 349 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 27, 1987

    On the same day, a special meeting of the board of directors of Brown-Schaefer adopted a Plan of Merger of Old Cannons-burg into Brown-Schaefer. … Brown v. United States, 782 F.2d 559 (6th Cir.1986), remanding 600 F.Supp. 47 (W.D.Ky.1984).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.