Case law

Franklin Iron & Metal Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

83 F.3d 156 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1996

Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 464-65 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v. Okun Bros. … NLRB v. Aquatech, Inc., 926 F.2d 538, 544 (6th Cir.1991); NLRB v. Garon, 738 F.2d 140, 142 (6th Cir.1984).

National Labor Relations Board v. H. W. Elson Bottling Company

379 F.2d 223 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1967

It is based in part upon a measure initiated by the Board and approved by this court in Montgomery Ward v. N.L.R.B., 339 F.2d 889 (C.A. 6,1965). … Enforcement of the Board’s order is granted, with Paragraph 2(c) amended to conform to the speech remedy previously approved by this court in Montgomery Ward v.

Lovely v. United States

570 F.3d 778 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 26, 2009

See Brown v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

123 F.2d 670 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 2, 1941

Jefferson Electric Company v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 102 F.2d 949 ; National Labor Relations Board v. National Motor Bearing Company, 9 Cir., 105 F.2d 652 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Consolidated Edison Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 230 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Ford, 6 Cir., 114 F.2d 905 .

Long v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky

21 F. App'x 252 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 2001

Upon de novo review, Boroff v. … See Long v. Board of Educ. of Jefferson County, Ky., 121 F.Supp.2d 621 (W.D.Ky.2000). Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Van Tran Electric Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

449 F.2d 774 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1971

Petitioner contends that, under the doctrine of NLRB v. Brown Lumber Co., 336 F.2d 641 (6th Cir. 1964), the Regional Director’s refusal to permit the late filing of objections invalidates the Union’s certification. … In that case, the employer filed timely objections to the claimed misconduct of a Board agent but failed to serve copies upon the Union as the Board rules required.

National Labor Relations Board v. C & E Stores, Inc.

611 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 20, 1979

The Board, therefore, ordered the Company to bargain with the union without first holding an election, in accordance with NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1968). … Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the application of the Board is granted and the Board’s order is enforced in full.

National Labor Relations Board v. Memphis Furniture Manufacturing Company

616 F.2d 964 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 11, 1980

We hold that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence. There was no due process violation when the Board refused to reopen. … Accordingly the order of the Board is enforced.

Wilson v. Brown

927 F.2d 606 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 25, 1991

WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr.; Dan Bolden; Dale Foltz; Joe Weinberg; Denny Straub; Danny Trudell; John W. … Wilson does not have a constitutional right to be incarcerated at a particular facility, see Montayne v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 242 (1976), or at a particular classification level, see Meachum v.

Crestline Memorial Hospital Association, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

668 F.2d 243 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 5, 1982

See NLRB v. … B. v. F.

Doric Apartment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

94 F.2d 895 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1938

Commissioner, 6 Cir., 59 F.2d 914 , but have- recently indicated that this does not mean that the Board is under compulsion to reject it. Brown v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 94 F.2d 101 , decided January 5, 1938. … As was said in Crowell v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 62 F.2d 51, 53 , “We do not understand that market value is to be determined only by proof of actual sales. It may exist independent of such sales.” Cf. Brown v.

Stone v. Board of Directors of Tennessee Valley Authority

35 F. App'x 193 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 2002

Stone, appeals from the summary judgment granted to defendant, Board of Directors of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), on her Title VII sex discrimination and retaliation claims. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. … Bowman v. Shawnee State Univ., 220 F.3d 456, 462 (6th Cir.2000). Clearly a positive review, with or without supporting comments, is not an adverse employment action. See Primes v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Courtyard Manor of Livonia

107 F. App'x 574 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 19, 2004

JUDGMENT The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) applies for summary enforcement of its April 21, 2004, decision and order in Cases No. 7-CA-46860, 7-CA-46907, and 7-CA-47054 in which it found the respondent violated … The respondent did not file an answer to the complaint and has not made an appearance either before the Board or this court. Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mock Road Super Duper, Inc.

393 F.2d 432 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 1968

In its attempt to support this determination the Board in its brief' cites a number of cases. None, however, is in point. In Montgomery Ward & Co. v. N. L. R. … Enforcement of the Board’s order, modified in accordance with this opinion, is granted. * The situation thus differs from that presented to this Court in N.L.R.B. v.

National Refining Co. v. Willis

143 F. 107 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 16, 1905

To strengthen the center piece, Brown built below it a V-shaped truss or brace, made of boards 6 inches wide and 1 inch thick. After this platform was constructed, the adjustment of the rafters was begun. … When the V-shaped brace was found out of alignment, Brown says Hummel' asked him why the scaffold would-not carry the weight, and he told him it was because he had the weight on the roof.

National Labor Relations Board v. Price's Pic-Pac Supermarkets, Inc.

707 F.2d 236 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 3, 1983

The Board found five such violations, the first of which is that the defendant coercively interrogated and polled employees about the union. While questioning employees about a union is not per se unlawful, NLRB v. … Armstrong Circuit, Inc., 462 F.2d 355, 357 (6th Cir.1972), the Board’s assessment of coercive effect, if reasonable, should be sustained. Cf. Henry I. Siegel Co. v.

United States v. Dexter O'Bryant Bond (92-2266) Ervin Brown, Jr. (92-2268)

22 F.3d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 8, 1994

United States v. … See United States v.

Mitchellace, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

90 F.3d 1150 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 1996

Co. v. … In NLRB v.

Unpublished Disposition John Perotti, Cross-Appellant v. Richard Seiter, Gary Brown, Cross-Appellee

869 F.2d 1492 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 16, 1989

B. 18 Brown also argues that his actions were protected by the defense of qualified good faith immunity as set out in Harlow v. … Indeed, Whitley relied upon Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977), which in turn relied upon Estelle v.

The Kroger Company v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Plumbers, Steamfitters, & Pipefitters Local No. 155

477 F.2d 1104 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 11, 1973

American Bread Company v. NLRB, 411 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1969). … See Reynolds v. Plumbers, Local 155, 79 LRRM 2224 (E.D.Ark., 1971).” Therefore, if the Board’s approval of the handbilling is approved, such hand-billing might indeed be resumed.